Cargando…
Effectiveness of interventions for middle-aged and ageing population with neck pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol
INTRODUCTION: Neck pain (NP) is a common musculoskeletal complaint and is increasing in prevalence. Current clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews recommended conservative, pharmacological and invasive interventions for individuals with NP. However, optimal management specifically for t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9204418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35705332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060373 |
_version_ | 1784728922228785152 |
---|---|
author | Boonyapo, Uchukarn Rushton, Alison B Heneghan, Nicola R Dilokthornsakul, Piyameth Phungwattanakul, Nattawan Wiangkham, Taweewat |
author_facet | Boonyapo, Uchukarn Rushton, Alison B Heneghan, Nicola R Dilokthornsakul, Piyameth Phungwattanakul, Nattawan Wiangkham, Taweewat |
author_sort | Boonyapo, Uchukarn |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Neck pain (NP) is a common musculoskeletal complaint and is increasing in prevalence. Current clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews recommended conservative, pharmacological and invasive interventions for individuals with NP. However, optimal management specifically for those who are middle-aged or older adults (≥45 years) is not available; and important considering our ageing population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted following the Cochrane guidelines. Eligibility criteria include randomised controlled/clinical trials evaluating any of acute (<3 months) or chronic (≥3 months) non-specific NP, whiplash associated disorders, cervical radiculopathy and cervicogenic headache. Any interventions and outcome measures detailed within The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domains will be included. Two independent reviewers will search key databases (AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PEDro and PsycINFO), grey literature, key journals and reference lists in May 2022. Two reviewers will decide eligibility and assess risk of bias (ROB) of included studies. The kappa statistic will be used to evaluate agreement between the reviewers at each stage. Data will be extracted by one reviewer and checked for accuracy by a second reviewer. Descriptive data and ROB will be summarised and tabulated. Traditional pairwise meta-analysis using random-effect model will be performed for all direct comparisons, and NMA using a frequentist random-effect model then performed based on NP classification where possible. A network of traditional pairwise meta-analysis allows comparisons of multiple interventions from both direct and indirect evidence to provide a hierarchal establishment for enhancing decision making of clinical practitioners. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethic approval is not required as the study is a literature review. The findings will be shared with the national and international researchers, healthcare professionals and the general public through publishing in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021284618. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9204418 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92044182022-06-29 Effectiveness of interventions for middle-aged and ageing population with neck pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol Boonyapo, Uchukarn Rushton, Alison B Heneghan, Nicola R Dilokthornsakul, Piyameth Phungwattanakul, Nattawan Wiangkham, Taweewat BMJ Open Geriatric Medicine INTRODUCTION: Neck pain (NP) is a common musculoskeletal complaint and is increasing in prevalence. Current clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews recommended conservative, pharmacological and invasive interventions for individuals with NP. However, optimal management specifically for those who are middle-aged or older adults (≥45 years) is not available; and important considering our ageing population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted following the Cochrane guidelines. Eligibility criteria include randomised controlled/clinical trials evaluating any of acute (<3 months) or chronic (≥3 months) non-specific NP, whiplash associated disorders, cervical radiculopathy and cervicogenic headache. Any interventions and outcome measures detailed within The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domains will be included. Two independent reviewers will search key databases (AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PEDro and PsycINFO), grey literature, key journals and reference lists in May 2022. Two reviewers will decide eligibility and assess risk of bias (ROB) of included studies. The kappa statistic will be used to evaluate agreement between the reviewers at each stage. Data will be extracted by one reviewer and checked for accuracy by a second reviewer. Descriptive data and ROB will be summarised and tabulated. Traditional pairwise meta-analysis using random-effect model will be performed for all direct comparisons, and NMA using a frequentist random-effect model then performed based on NP classification where possible. A network of traditional pairwise meta-analysis allows comparisons of multiple interventions from both direct and indirect evidence to provide a hierarchal establishment for enhancing decision making of clinical practitioners. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethic approval is not required as the study is a literature review. The findings will be shared with the national and international researchers, healthcare professionals and the general public through publishing in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021284618. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9204418/ /pubmed/35705332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060373 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Geriatric Medicine Boonyapo, Uchukarn Rushton, Alison B Heneghan, Nicola R Dilokthornsakul, Piyameth Phungwattanakul, Nattawan Wiangkham, Taweewat Effectiveness of interventions for middle-aged and ageing population with neck pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol |
title | Effectiveness of interventions for middle-aged and ageing population with neck pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol |
title_full | Effectiveness of interventions for middle-aged and ageing population with neck pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of interventions for middle-aged and ageing population with neck pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of interventions for middle-aged and ageing population with neck pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol |
title_short | Effectiveness of interventions for middle-aged and ageing population with neck pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol |
title_sort | effectiveness of interventions for middle-aged and ageing population with neck pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol |
topic | Geriatric Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9204418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35705332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060373 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boonyapouchukarn effectivenessofinterventionsformiddleagedandageingpopulationwithneckpainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT rushtonalisonb effectivenessofinterventionsformiddleagedandageingpopulationwithneckpainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT heneghannicolar effectivenessofinterventionsformiddleagedandageingpopulationwithneckpainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT dilokthornsakulpiyameth effectivenessofinterventionsformiddleagedandageingpopulationwithneckpainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT phungwattanakulnattawan effectivenessofinterventionsformiddleagedandageingpopulationwithneckpainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT wiangkhamtaweewat effectivenessofinterventionsformiddleagedandageingpopulationwithneckpainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol |