Cargando…

Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs with risk factor modification for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial (PRAGUE-25 trial)

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF), with a prevalence of 2%, is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Catheter ablation (CA) has been documented to be superior to treatment by antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in terms of sinus rhythm maintenance. However, in obese patients, substantial weight loss was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Osmancik, Pavel, Havránek, Štěpán, Bulková, Veronika, Chovančík, Jan, Roubíček, Tomáš, Heřman, Dalibor, Čarná, Zuzana, Tuka, Vladimír, Matoulek, Martin, Fiala, Martin, Jiravský, Otakar, Stregl-Hruskova, Sylvie, Latiňák, Adam, Kotryová, Jiřina, Jarkovský, Jiří
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9204431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35705334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056522
_version_ 1784728925289578496
author Osmancik, Pavel
Havránek, Štěpán
Bulková, Veronika
Chovančík, Jan
Roubíček, Tomáš
Heřman, Dalibor
Čarná, Zuzana
Tuka, Vladimír
Matoulek, Martin
Fiala, Martin
Jiravský, Otakar
Stregl-Hruskova, Sylvie
Latiňák, Adam
Kotryová, Jiřina
Jarkovský, Jiří
author_facet Osmancik, Pavel
Havránek, Štěpán
Bulková, Veronika
Chovančík, Jan
Roubíček, Tomáš
Heřman, Dalibor
Čarná, Zuzana
Tuka, Vladimír
Matoulek, Martin
Fiala, Martin
Jiravský, Otakar
Stregl-Hruskova, Sylvie
Latiňák, Adam
Kotryová, Jiřina
Jarkovský, Jiří
author_sort Osmancik, Pavel
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF), with a prevalence of 2%, is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Catheter ablation (CA) has been documented to be superior to treatment by antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in terms of sinus rhythm maintenance. However, in obese patients, substantial weight loss was also associated with AF reduction. So far, no study has compared the modern non-invasive (AADs combined with risk factor modification (RFM)) approach with modern invasive (CA) treatment. The aim of the trial is to compare the efficacy of modern invasive (CA) and non-invasive (AADs with risk factor management) treatment of AF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The trial will be a prospective, multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial. Patients with symptomatic AF and a body mass index >30 will be enrolled and randomised to the CA or RFM arm (RFM+AAD) in a 1:1 ratio. In the CA arm, pulmonary vein isolation (in combination with additional lesion sets in non-paroxysmal patients) will be performed. For patients in the RFM+AAD arm, the aim will be a 10% weight loss over 6–12 months, increased physical fitness and a reduction in alcohol consumption. The primary endpoint will be an episode of AF or regular atrial tachycardia lasting >30 s. The secondary endpoints include AF burden, clinical endpoints associated with AF reoccurrence, changes in the quality of life assessed using dedicated questionnaires, changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and metabolic endpoints. An AF freedom of 65% in the RFM+AAD and of 60% in the CA is expected; therefore, 202 patients will be enrolled to achieve the non-inferiority with 80% power, 5% one-sided alpha and a non-inferiority margin of 12%. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The PRAGUE-25 trial will determine if modern non-invasive AF treatment strategies are non-inferior to CA. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady. Results of the study will be disseminated on scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed scientific journals. After the end of follow-up, data will be available upon request to principal investigator. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04011800).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9204431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92044312022-06-29 Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs with risk factor modification for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial (PRAGUE-25 trial) Osmancik, Pavel Havránek, Štěpán Bulková, Veronika Chovančík, Jan Roubíček, Tomáš Heřman, Dalibor Čarná, Zuzana Tuka, Vladimír Matoulek, Martin Fiala, Martin Jiravský, Otakar Stregl-Hruskova, Sylvie Latiňák, Adam Kotryová, Jiřina Jarkovský, Jiří BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF), with a prevalence of 2%, is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Catheter ablation (CA) has been documented to be superior to treatment by antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in terms of sinus rhythm maintenance. However, in obese patients, substantial weight loss was also associated with AF reduction. So far, no study has compared the modern non-invasive (AADs combined with risk factor modification (RFM)) approach with modern invasive (CA) treatment. The aim of the trial is to compare the efficacy of modern invasive (CA) and non-invasive (AADs with risk factor management) treatment of AF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The trial will be a prospective, multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial. Patients with symptomatic AF and a body mass index >30 will be enrolled and randomised to the CA or RFM arm (RFM+AAD) in a 1:1 ratio. In the CA arm, pulmonary vein isolation (in combination with additional lesion sets in non-paroxysmal patients) will be performed. For patients in the RFM+AAD arm, the aim will be a 10% weight loss over 6–12 months, increased physical fitness and a reduction in alcohol consumption. The primary endpoint will be an episode of AF or regular atrial tachycardia lasting >30 s. The secondary endpoints include AF burden, clinical endpoints associated with AF reoccurrence, changes in the quality of life assessed using dedicated questionnaires, changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and metabolic endpoints. An AF freedom of 65% in the RFM+AAD and of 60% in the CA is expected; therefore, 202 patients will be enrolled to achieve the non-inferiority with 80% power, 5% one-sided alpha and a non-inferiority margin of 12%. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The PRAGUE-25 trial will determine if modern non-invasive AF treatment strategies are non-inferior to CA. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady. Results of the study will be disseminated on scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed scientific journals. After the end of follow-up, data will be available upon request to principal investigator. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04011800). BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9204431/ /pubmed/35705334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056522 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Osmancik, Pavel
Havránek, Štěpán
Bulková, Veronika
Chovančík, Jan
Roubíček, Tomáš
Heřman, Dalibor
Čarná, Zuzana
Tuka, Vladimír
Matoulek, Martin
Fiala, Martin
Jiravský, Otakar
Stregl-Hruskova, Sylvie
Latiňák, Adam
Kotryová, Jiřina
Jarkovský, Jiří
Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs with risk factor modification for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial (PRAGUE-25 trial)
title Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs with risk factor modification for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial (PRAGUE-25 trial)
title_full Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs with risk factor modification for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial (PRAGUE-25 trial)
title_fullStr Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs with risk factor modification for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial (PRAGUE-25 trial)
title_full_unstemmed Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs with risk factor modification for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial (PRAGUE-25 trial)
title_short Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs with risk factor modification for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial (PRAGUE-25 trial)
title_sort catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs with risk factor modification for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial (prague-25 trial)
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9204431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35705334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056522
work_keys_str_mv AT osmancikpavel catheterablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugswithriskfactormodificationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationaprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrialprague25trial
AT havranekstepan catheterablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugswithriskfactormodificationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationaprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrialprague25trial
AT bulkovaveronika catheterablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugswithriskfactormodificationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationaprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrialprague25trial
AT chovancikjan catheterablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugswithriskfactormodificationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationaprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrialprague25trial
AT roubicektomas catheterablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugswithriskfactormodificationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationaprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrialprague25trial
AT hermandalibor catheterablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugswithriskfactormodificationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationaprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrialprague25trial
AT carnazuzana catheterablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugswithriskfactormodificationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationaprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrialprague25trial
AT tukavladimir catheterablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugswithriskfactormodificationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationaprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrialprague25trial
AT matoulekmartin catheterablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugswithriskfactormodificationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationaprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrialprague25trial
AT fialamartin catheterablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugswithriskfactormodificationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationaprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrialprague25trial
AT jiravskyotakar catheterablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugswithriskfactormodificationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationaprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrialprague25trial
AT streglhruskovasylvie catheterablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugswithriskfactormodificationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationaprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrialprague25trial
AT latinakadam catheterablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugswithriskfactormodificationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationaprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrialprague25trial
AT kotryovajirina catheterablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugswithriskfactormodificationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationaprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrialprague25trial
AT jarkovskyjiri catheterablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugswithriskfactormodificationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationaprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrialprague25trial