Cargando…

Systematic review and narrative synthesis of the impact of Appreciative Inquiry in healthcare

BACKGROUND: Appreciative Inquiry is a motivational, organisational change intervention, which can be used to improve the quality and safety of healthcare. It encourages organisations to focus on the positive and investigate the best of ‘what is’ before thinking of ‘what might be’, deciding ‘what sho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merriel, Abi, Wilson, Amie, Decker, Emily, Hussein, Julia, Larkin, Michael, Barnard, Katie, O’Dair, Millie, Costello, Anthony, Malata, Address, Coomarasamy, Arri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9204436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35710130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001911
_version_ 1784728926375903232
author Merriel, Abi
Wilson, Amie
Decker, Emily
Hussein, Julia
Larkin, Michael
Barnard, Katie
O’Dair, Millie
Costello, Anthony
Malata, Address
Coomarasamy, Arri
author_facet Merriel, Abi
Wilson, Amie
Decker, Emily
Hussein, Julia
Larkin, Michael
Barnard, Katie
O’Dair, Millie
Costello, Anthony
Malata, Address
Coomarasamy, Arri
author_sort Merriel, Abi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Appreciative Inquiry is a motivational, organisational change intervention, which can be used to improve the quality and safety of healthcare. It encourages organisations to focus on the positive and investigate the best of ‘what is’ before thinking of ‘what might be’, deciding ‘what should be’ and experiencing ‘what can be’. Its effects in healthcare are poorly understood. This review seeks to evaluate whether Appreciative Inquiry can improve healthcare. METHODS: Major electronic databases and grey literature were searched. Two authors identified reports of Appreciative Inquiry in clinical settings by screening study titles, abstracts and full texts. Data extraction, in duplicate, grouped outcomes into an adapted Kirkpatrick model: participant reaction, attitudes, knowledge/skills, behaviour change, organisational change and patient outcomes. RESULTS: We included 33 studies. One randomised controlled trial, 9 controlled observational studies, 4 qualitative studies and 19 non-controlled observational reports. Study quality was generally poor, with most having significant risk of bias. Studies report that Appreciative Inquiry impacts outcomes at all Kirkpatrick levels. Participant reaction was positive in the 16 studies reporting it. Attitudes changed in the seventeen studies that reported them. Knowledge/skills changed in the 14 studies that reported it, although in one it was not universal. Behaviour change occurred in 12 of the 13 studies reporting it. Organisational change occurred in all 23 studies that reported it. Patient outcomes were reported in eight studies, six of which reported positive changes and two of which showed no change. CONCLUSION: There is minimal empirical evidence to support the effectiveness of Appreciative Inquiry in improving healthcare. However, the qualitative and observational evidence suggests that Appreciative Inquiry may have a positive impact on clinical care, leading to improved patient and organisational outcomes. It is, therefore, worthy of consideration when trying to deliver improvements in care. However, high-quality studies are needed to prove its effects. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015014485.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9204436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92044362022-06-29 Systematic review and narrative synthesis of the impact of Appreciative Inquiry in healthcare Merriel, Abi Wilson, Amie Decker, Emily Hussein, Julia Larkin, Michael Barnard, Katie O’Dair, Millie Costello, Anthony Malata, Address Coomarasamy, Arri BMJ Open Qual Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Appreciative Inquiry is a motivational, organisational change intervention, which can be used to improve the quality and safety of healthcare. It encourages organisations to focus on the positive and investigate the best of ‘what is’ before thinking of ‘what might be’, deciding ‘what should be’ and experiencing ‘what can be’. Its effects in healthcare are poorly understood. This review seeks to evaluate whether Appreciative Inquiry can improve healthcare. METHODS: Major electronic databases and grey literature were searched. Two authors identified reports of Appreciative Inquiry in clinical settings by screening study titles, abstracts and full texts. Data extraction, in duplicate, grouped outcomes into an adapted Kirkpatrick model: participant reaction, attitudes, knowledge/skills, behaviour change, organisational change and patient outcomes. RESULTS: We included 33 studies. One randomised controlled trial, 9 controlled observational studies, 4 qualitative studies and 19 non-controlled observational reports. Study quality was generally poor, with most having significant risk of bias. Studies report that Appreciative Inquiry impacts outcomes at all Kirkpatrick levels. Participant reaction was positive in the 16 studies reporting it. Attitudes changed in the seventeen studies that reported them. Knowledge/skills changed in the 14 studies that reported it, although in one it was not universal. Behaviour change occurred in 12 of the 13 studies reporting it. Organisational change occurred in all 23 studies that reported it. Patient outcomes were reported in eight studies, six of which reported positive changes and two of which showed no change. CONCLUSION: There is minimal empirical evidence to support the effectiveness of Appreciative Inquiry in improving healthcare. However, the qualitative and observational evidence suggests that Appreciative Inquiry may have a positive impact on clinical care, leading to improved patient and organisational outcomes. It is, therefore, worthy of consideration when trying to deliver improvements in care. However, high-quality studies are needed to prove its effects. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015014485. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9204436/ /pubmed/35710130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001911 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Merriel, Abi
Wilson, Amie
Decker, Emily
Hussein, Julia
Larkin, Michael
Barnard, Katie
O’Dair, Millie
Costello, Anthony
Malata, Address
Coomarasamy, Arri
Systematic review and narrative synthesis of the impact of Appreciative Inquiry in healthcare
title Systematic review and narrative synthesis of the impact of Appreciative Inquiry in healthcare
title_full Systematic review and narrative synthesis of the impact of Appreciative Inquiry in healthcare
title_fullStr Systematic review and narrative synthesis of the impact of Appreciative Inquiry in healthcare
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review and narrative synthesis of the impact of Appreciative Inquiry in healthcare
title_short Systematic review and narrative synthesis of the impact of Appreciative Inquiry in healthcare
title_sort systematic review and narrative synthesis of the impact of appreciative inquiry in healthcare
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9204436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35710130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001911
work_keys_str_mv AT merrielabi systematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisoftheimpactofappreciativeinquiryinhealthcare
AT wilsonamie systematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisoftheimpactofappreciativeinquiryinhealthcare
AT deckeremily systematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisoftheimpactofappreciativeinquiryinhealthcare
AT husseinjulia systematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisoftheimpactofappreciativeinquiryinhealthcare
AT larkinmichael systematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisoftheimpactofappreciativeinquiryinhealthcare
AT barnardkatie systematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisoftheimpactofappreciativeinquiryinhealthcare
AT odairmillie systematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisoftheimpactofappreciativeinquiryinhealthcare
AT costelloanthony systematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisoftheimpactofappreciativeinquiryinhealthcare
AT malataaddress systematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisoftheimpactofappreciativeinquiryinhealthcare
AT coomarasamyarri systematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisoftheimpactofappreciativeinquiryinhealthcare