Cargando…

Designing and evaluating a patient decision aid for patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer: a national multicentre mixed methods study protocol

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 5%–10% of new rectal cancers are locally advanced (locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC)) at presentation with 4%–8% recurring (locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC)) after initial treatment. Patients with potentially curable disease have to consider many trade-offs when...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Anwen, Hutchings, Hayley Anne, Harris, Dean Anthony, Evans, Martyn, Harji, Deena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9204455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35705344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056984
_version_ 1784728930988589056
author Williams, Anwen
Hutchings, Hayley Anne
Harris, Dean Anthony
Evans, Martyn
Harji, Deena
author_facet Williams, Anwen
Hutchings, Hayley Anne
Harris, Dean Anthony
Evans, Martyn
Harji, Deena
author_sort Williams, Anwen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Approximately 5%–10% of new rectal cancers are locally advanced (locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC)) at presentation with 4%–8% recurring (locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC)) after initial treatment. Patients with potentially curable disease have to consider many trade-offs when considering major exenterative surgery. There are no decision tools for these patients and current resources have found to not meet minimum international standards. The overall aim of this study is to produce a validated patient decision aid (PtDA) to assist patients considering radical pelvic exenteration for LARC and LRRC created in line with international minimum standards. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a national, multicentre mixed methods project and has been designed in keeping with guidance from the International Patient Decision Aids Standard. This study is in four stages. In stage 1, we will develop the PtDA and its content using agile developmental methodology. In stage 2, we will assess the content and face validity of the PtDA using mixed-methods with key stakeholders. In stage 3, we will assess the feasibility and efficacy of the PtDA. In stage 4, we will establish the barriers and facilitators to the use of a PtDA in the outpatient setting. Questionnaires including the QQ-10, EORTC PATSAT-C33, Preparation for Decision-Making Scale and the NoMAD survey will be analysed during the study. Interviews will be analysed using thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research ethics approval from North of Scotland Research Ethics Service 19/NS/0056 (IRAS 257890) has been granted. Results will be published in open access peer-reviewed journals, presented in conferences and distributed through bowel research UK charity. External endorsement will be sought from the International Patient Decision Standards Collaboration inventory of PtDAs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019122933.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9204455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92044552022-06-29 Designing and evaluating a patient decision aid for patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer: a national multicentre mixed methods study protocol Williams, Anwen Hutchings, Hayley Anne Harris, Dean Anthony Evans, Martyn Harji, Deena BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Approximately 5%–10% of new rectal cancers are locally advanced (locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC)) at presentation with 4%–8% recurring (locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC)) after initial treatment. Patients with potentially curable disease have to consider many trade-offs when considering major exenterative surgery. There are no decision tools for these patients and current resources have found to not meet minimum international standards. The overall aim of this study is to produce a validated patient decision aid (PtDA) to assist patients considering radical pelvic exenteration for LARC and LRRC created in line with international minimum standards. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a national, multicentre mixed methods project and has been designed in keeping with guidance from the International Patient Decision Aids Standard. This study is in four stages. In stage 1, we will develop the PtDA and its content using agile developmental methodology. In stage 2, we will assess the content and face validity of the PtDA using mixed-methods with key stakeholders. In stage 3, we will assess the feasibility and efficacy of the PtDA. In stage 4, we will establish the barriers and facilitators to the use of a PtDA in the outpatient setting. Questionnaires including the QQ-10, EORTC PATSAT-C33, Preparation for Decision-Making Scale and the NoMAD survey will be analysed during the study. Interviews will be analysed using thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research ethics approval from North of Scotland Research Ethics Service 19/NS/0056 (IRAS 257890) has been granted. Results will be published in open access peer-reviewed journals, presented in conferences and distributed through bowel research UK charity. External endorsement will be sought from the International Patient Decision Standards Collaboration inventory of PtDAs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019122933. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9204455/ /pubmed/35705344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056984 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Surgery
Williams, Anwen
Hutchings, Hayley Anne
Harris, Dean Anthony
Evans, Martyn
Harji, Deena
Designing and evaluating a patient decision aid for patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer: a national multicentre mixed methods study protocol
title Designing and evaluating a patient decision aid for patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer: a national multicentre mixed methods study protocol
title_full Designing and evaluating a patient decision aid for patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer: a national multicentre mixed methods study protocol
title_fullStr Designing and evaluating a patient decision aid for patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer: a national multicentre mixed methods study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Designing and evaluating a patient decision aid for patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer: a national multicentre mixed methods study protocol
title_short Designing and evaluating a patient decision aid for patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer: a national multicentre mixed methods study protocol
title_sort designing and evaluating a patient decision aid for patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer: a national multicentre mixed methods study protocol
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9204455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35705344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056984
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsanwen designingandevaluatingapatientdecisionaidforpatientswithlocallyadvancedorlocallyrecurrentrectalcanceranationalmulticentremixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT hutchingshayleyanne designingandevaluatingapatientdecisionaidforpatientswithlocallyadvancedorlocallyrecurrentrectalcanceranationalmulticentremixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT harrisdeananthony designingandevaluatingapatientdecisionaidforpatientswithlocallyadvancedorlocallyrecurrentrectalcanceranationalmulticentremixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT evansmartyn designingandevaluatingapatientdecisionaidforpatientswithlocallyadvancedorlocallyrecurrentrectalcanceranationalmulticentremixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT harjideena designingandevaluatingapatientdecisionaidforpatientswithlocallyadvancedorlocallyrecurrentrectalcanceranationalmulticentremixedmethodsstudyprotocol