Cargando…
Prior Signal Acquisition Software Versions for Orbitrap Underestimate Low Isobaric Mass Tag Intensities, Without Detriment to Differential Abundance Experiments
[Image: see text] Tandem mass tags (TMTs) enable simple and accurate quantitative proteomics for multiplexed samples by relative quantification of tag reporter ions. Orbitrap quantification of reporter ions has been associated with a characteristic notch region in intensity distribution, within whic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9204819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35726249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.1c00053 |
_version_ | 1784729003688460288 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Tom S. Andrejeva, Anna Christopher, Josie Crook, Oliver M. Elzek, Mohamed Lilley, Kathryn S. |
author_facet | Smith, Tom S. Andrejeva, Anna Christopher, Josie Crook, Oliver M. Elzek, Mohamed Lilley, Kathryn S. |
author_sort | Smith, Tom S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Tandem mass tags (TMTs) enable simple and accurate quantitative proteomics for multiplexed samples by relative quantification of tag reporter ions. Orbitrap quantification of reporter ions has been associated with a characteristic notch region in intensity distribution, within which few reporter intensities are recorded. This has been resolved in version 3 of the instrument acquisition software Tune. However, 47% of Orbitrap Fusion, Lumos, or Eclipse submissions to PRIDE were generated using prior software versions. To quantify the impact of the notch on existing quantitative proteomics data, we generated a mixed species benchmark and acquired quantitative data using Tune versions 2 and 3. Intensities below the notch are predominantly underestimated with Tune version 2, leading to overestimation of the true differences in intensities between samples. However, when summarizing reporter ion intensities to higher-level features, such as peptides and proteins, few features are significantly affected. Targeted removal of spectra with reporter ion intensities below the notch is not beneficial for differential peptide or protein testing. Overall, we find that the systematic quantification bias associated with the notch is not detrimental for a typical proteomics experiment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9204819 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92048192022-06-18 Prior Signal Acquisition Software Versions for Orbitrap Underestimate Low Isobaric Mass Tag Intensities, Without Detriment to Differential Abundance Experiments Smith, Tom S. Andrejeva, Anna Christopher, Josie Crook, Oliver M. Elzek, Mohamed Lilley, Kathryn S. ACS Meas Sci Au [Image: see text] Tandem mass tags (TMTs) enable simple and accurate quantitative proteomics for multiplexed samples by relative quantification of tag reporter ions. Orbitrap quantification of reporter ions has been associated with a characteristic notch region in intensity distribution, within which few reporter intensities are recorded. This has been resolved in version 3 of the instrument acquisition software Tune. However, 47% of Orbitrap Fusion, Lumos, or Eclipse submissions to PRIDE were generated using prior software versions. To quantify the impact of the notch on existing quantitative proteomics data, we generated a mixed species benchmark and acquired quantitative data using Tune versions 2 and 3. Intensities below the notch are predominantly underestimated with Tune version 2, leading to overestimation of the true differences in intensities between samples. However, when summarizing reporter ion intensities to higher-level features, such as peptides and proteins, few features are significantly affected. Targeted removal of spectra with reporter ion intensities below the notch is not beneficial for differential peptide or protein testing. Overall, we find that the systematic quantification bias associated with the notch is not detrimental for a typical proteomics experiment. American Chemical Society 2022-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9204819/ /pubmed/35726249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.1c00053 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Smith, Tom S. Andrejeva, Anna Christopher, Josie Crook, Oliver M. Elzek, Mohamed Lilley, Kathryn S. Prior Signal Acquisition Software Versions for Orbitrap Underestimate Low Isobaric Mass Tag Intensities, Without Detriment to Differential Abundance Experiments |
title | Prior Signal Acquisition Software Versions for Orbitrap
Underestimate Low Isobaric Mass Tag Intensities, Without Detriment
to Differential Abundance Experiments |
title_full | Prior Signal Acquisition Software Versions for Orbitrap
Underestimate Low Isobaric Mass Tag Intensities, Without Detriment
to Differential Abundance Experiments |
title_fullStr | Prior Signal Acquisition Software Versions for Orbitrap
Underestimate Low Isobaric Mass Tag Intensities, Without Detriment
to Differential Abundance Experiments |
title_full_unstemmed | Prior Signal Acquisition Software Versions for Orbitrap
Underestimate Low Isobaric Mass Tag Intensities, Without Detriment
to Differential Abundance Experiments |
title_short | Prior Signal Acquisition Software Versions for Orbitrap
Underestimate Low Isobaric Mass Tag Intensities, Without Detriment
to Differential Abundance Experiments |
title_sort | prior signal acquisition software versions for orbitrap
underestimate low isobaric mass tag intensities, without detriment
to differential abundance experiments |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9204819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35726249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.1c00053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithtoms priorsignalacquisitionsoftwareversionsfororbitrapunderestimatelowisobaricmasstagintensitieswithoutdetrimenttodifferentialabundanceexperiments AT andrejevaanna priorsignalacquisitionsoftwareversionsfororbitrapunderestimatelowisobaricmasstagintensitieswithoutdetrimenttodifferentialabundanceexperiments AT christopherjosie priorsignalacquisitionsoftwareversionsfororbitrapunderestimatelowisobaricmasstagintensitieswithoutdetrimenttodifferentialabundanceexperiments AT crookoliverm priorsignalacquisitionsoftwareversionsfororbitrapunderestimatelowisobaricmasstagintensitieswithoutdetrimenttodifferentialabundanceexperiments AT elzekmohamed priorsignalacquisitionsoftwareversionsfororbitrapunderestimatelowisobaricmasstagintensitieswithoutdetrimenttodifferentialabundanceexperiments AT lilleykathryns priorsignalacquisitionsoftwareversionsfororbitrapunderestimatelowisobaricmasstagintensitieswithoutdetrimenttodifferentialabundanceexperiments |