Cargando…

Prior Signal Acquisition Software Versions for Orbitrap Underestimate Low Isobaric Mass Tag Intensities, Without Detriment to Differential Abundance Experiments

[Image: see text] Tandem mass tags (TMTs) enable simple and accurate quantitative proteomics for multiplexed samples by relative quantification of tag reporter ions. Orbitrap quantification of reporter ions has been associated with a characteristic notch region in intensity distribution, within whic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Tom S., Andrejeva, Anna, Christopher, Josie, Crook, Oliver M., Elzek, Mohamed, Lilley, Kathryn S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9204819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35726249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.1c00053
_version_ 1784729003688460288
author Smith, Tom S.
Andrejeva, Anna
Christopher, Josie
Crook, Oliver M.
Elzek, Mohamed
Lilley, Kathryn S.
author_facet Smith, Tom S.
Andrejeva, Anna
Christopher, Josie
Crook, Oliver M.
Elzek, Mohamed
Lilley, Kathryn S.
author_sort Smith, Tom S.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Tandem mass tags (TMTs) enable simple and accurate quantitative proteomics for multiplexed samples by relative quantification of tag reporter ions. Orbitrap quantification of reporter ions has been associated with a characteristic notch region in intensity distribution, within which few reporter intensities are recorded. This has been resolved in version 3 of the instrument acquisition software Tune. However, 47% of Orbitrap Fusion, Lumos, or Eclipse submissions to PRIDE were generated using prior software versions. To quantify the impact of the notch on existing quantitative proteomics data, we generated a mixed species benchmark and acquired quantitative data using Tune versions 2 and 3. Intensities below the notch are predominantly underestimated with Tune version 2, leading to overestimation of the true differences in intensities between samples. However, when summarizing reporter ion intensities to higher-level features, such as peptides and proteins, few features are significantly affected. Targeted removal of spectra with reporter ion intensities below the notch is not beneficial for differential peptide or protein testing. Overall, we find that the systematic quantification bias associated with the notch is not detrimental for a typical proteomics experiment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9204819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92048192022-06-18 Prior Signal Acquisition Software Versions for Orbitrap Underestimate Low Isobaric Mass Tag Intensities, Without Detriment to Differential Abundance Experiments Smith, Tom S. Andrejeva, Anna Christopher, Josie Crook, Oliver M. Elzek, Mohamed Lilley, Kathryn S. ACS Meas Sci Au [Image: see text] Tandem mass tags (TMTs) enable simple and accurate quantitative proteomics for multiplexed samples by relative quantification of tag reporter ions. Orbitrap quantification of reporter ions has been associated with a characteristic notch region in intensity distribution, within which few reporter intensities are recorded. This has been resolved in version 3 of the instrument acquisition software Tune. However, 47% of Orbitrap Fusion, Lumos, or Eclipse submissions to PRIDE were generated using prior software versions. To quantify the impact of the notch on existing quantitative proteomics data, we generated a mixed species benchmark and acquired quantitative data using Tune versions 2 and 3. Intensities below the notch are predominantly underestimated with Tune version 2, leading to overestimation of the true differences in intensities between samples. However, when summarizing reporter ion intensities to higher-level features, such as peptides and proteins, few features are significantly affected. Targeted removal of spectra with reporter ion intensities below the notch is not beneficial for differential peptide or protein testing. Overall, we find that the systematic quantification bias associated with the notch is not detrimental for a typical proteomics experiment. American Chemical Society 2022-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9204819/ /pubmed/35726249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.1c00053 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Smith, Tom S.
Andrejeva, Anna
Christopher, Josie
Crook, Oliver M.
Elzek, Mohamed
Lilley, Kathryn S.
Prior Signal Acquisition Software Versions for Orbitrap Underestimate Low Isobaric Mass Tag Intensities, Without Detriment to Differential Abundance Experiments
title Prior Signal Acquisition Software Versions for Orbitrap Underestimate Low Isobaric Mass Tag Intensities, Without Detriment to Differential Abundance Experiments
title_full Prior Signal Acquisition Software Versions for Orbitrap Underestimate Low Isobaric Mass Tag Intensities, Without Detriment to Differential Abundance Experiments
title_fullStr Prior Signal Acquisition Software Versions for Orbitrap Underestimate Low Isobaric Mass Tag Intensities, Without Detriment to Differential Abundance Experiments
title_full_unstemmed Prior Signal Acquisition Software Versions for Orbitrap Underestimate Low Isobaric Mass Tag Intensities, Without Detriment to Differential Abundance Experiments
title_short Prior Signal Acquisition Software Versions for Orbitrap Underestimate Low Isobaric Mass Tag Intensities, Without Detriment to Differential Abundance Experiments
title_sort prior signal acquisition software versions for orbitrap underestimate low isobaric mass tag intensities, without detriment to differential abundance experiments
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9204819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35726249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.1c00053
work_keys_str_mv AT smithtoms priorsignalacquisitionsoftwareversionsfororbitrapunderestimatelowisobaricmasstagintensitieswithoutdetrimenttodifferentialabundanceexperiments
AT andrejevaanna priorsignalacquisitionsoftwareversionsfororbitrapunderestimatelowisobaricmasstagintensitieswithoutdetrimenttodifferentialabundanceexperiments
AT christopherjosie priorsignalacquisitionsoftwareversionsfororbitrapunderestimatelowisobaricmasstagintensitieswithoutdetrimenttodifferentialabundanceexperiments
AT crookoliverm priorsignalacquisitionsoftwareversionsfororbitrapunderestimatelowisobaricmasstagintensitieswithoutdetrimenttodifferentialabundanceexperiments
AT elzekmohamed priorsignalacquisitionsoftwareversionsfororbitrapunderestimatelowisobaricmasstagintensitieswithoutdetrimenttodifferentialabundanceexperiments
AT lilleykathryns priorsignalacquisitionsoftwareversionsfororbitrapunderestimatelowisobaricmasstagintensitieswithoutdetrimenttodifferentialabundanceexperiments