Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter to remove bacteria from the blood stream: results of the first in human study

BACKGROUND: Bacterial burden as well as duration of bacteremia influence the outcome of patients with bloodstream infections. Promptly decreasing bacterial load in the blood by using extracorporeal devices in addition to anti-infective therapy has recently been explored. Preclinical studies with the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eden, Gabriele, Schmidt, Julius J., Büttner, Stefan, Kümpers, Philipp, Hafer, Carsten, Rovas, Alexandros, Koch, Benjamin Florian, Schmidt, Bernhard M. W., Kielstein, Jan T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04044-7
_version_ 1784729046641278976
author Eden, Gabriele
Schmidt, Julius J.
Büttner, Stefan
Kümpers, Philipp
Hafer, Carsten
Rovas, Alexandros
Koch, Benjamin Florian
Schmidt, Bernhard M. W.
Kielstein, Jan T.
author_facet Eden, Gabriele
Schmidt, Julius J.
Büttner, Stefan
Kümpers, Philipp
Hafer, Carsten
Rovas, Alexandros
Koch, Benjamin Florian
Schmidt, Bernhard M. W.
Kielstein, Jan T.
author_sort Eden, Gabriele
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bacterial burden as well as duration of bacteremia influence the outcome of patients with bloodstream infections. Promptly decreasing bacterial load in the blood by using extracorporeal devices in addition to anti-infective therapy has recently been explored. Preclinical studies with the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter (Seraph® 100), which consists of heparin that is covalently bound to polymer beads, have demonstrated an effective binding of bacteria and viruses. Pathogens adhere to the heparin coated polymer beads in the adsorber as they would normally do to heparan sulfate on cell surfaces. Using this biomimetic principle, the Seraph® 100 could help to decrease bacterial burden in vivo. METHODS: This first in human, prospective, multicenter, non-randomized interventional study included patients with blood culture positive bloodstream infection and the need for kidney replacement therapy as an adjunctive treatment for bloodstream infections. We performed a single four-hour hemoperfusion treatment with the Seraph® 100 in conjunction with a dialysis procedure. Post procedure follow up was 14 days. RESULTS: Fifteen hemodialysis patients (3F/12 M, age 74.0 [68.0–78.5] years, dialysis vintage 28.0 [11.0–45.0] months) were enrolled. Seraph® 100 treatment started 66.4 [45.7–80.6] hours after the initial positive blood culture was drawn. During the treatment with the Seraph® 100 with a median blood flow of 285 [225–300] ml/min no device or treatment related adverse events were reported. Blood pressure and heart rate remained stable while peripheral oxygen saturation improved during the treatment from 98.0 [92.5–98.0] to 99.0 [98.0–99.5] %; p = 0.0184. Four patients still had positive blood culture at the start of Seraph® 100 treatment. In one patient blood cultures turned negative during treatment. The time to positivity (TTP) was increased between inflow and outflow blood cultures by 36 [− 7.2 to 96.3] minutes. However, overall TTP increase was not statistical significant. CONCLUSIONS: Seraph® 100 treatment was well tolerated. Adding Seraph® 100 to antibiotics early in the course of bacteremia might result in a faster resolution of bloodstream infections, which has to be evaluated in further studies. Trail registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02914132, first posted September 26, 2016. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-04044-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9205040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92050402022-06-18 Safety and efficacy of the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter to remove bacteria from the blood stream: results of the first in human study Eden, Gabriele Schmidt, Julius J. Büttner, Stefan Kümpers, Philipp Hafer, Carsten Rovas, Alexandros Koch, Benjamin Florian Schmidt, Bernhard M. W. Kielstein, Jan T. Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Bacterial burden as well as duration of bacteremia influence the outcome of patients with bloodstream infections. Promptly decreasing bacterial load in the blood by using extracorporeal devices in addition to anti-infective therapy has recently been explored. Preclinical studies with the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter (Seraph® 100), which consists of heparin that is covalently bound to polymer beads, have demonstrated an effective binding of bacteria and viruses. Pathogens adhere to the heparin coated polymer beads in the adsorber as they would normally do to heparan sulfate on cell surfaces. Using this biomimetic principle, the Seraph® 100 could help to decrease bacterial burden in vivo. METHODS: This first in human, prospective, multicenter, non-randomized interventional study included patients with blood culture positive bloodstream infection and the need for kidney replacement therapy as an adjunctive treatment for bloodstream infections. We performed a single four-hour hemoperfusion treatment with the Seraph® 100 in conjunction with a dialysis procedure. Post procedure follow up was 14 days. RESULTS: Fifteen hemodialysis patients (3F/12 M, age 74.0 [68.0–78.5] years, dialysis vintage 28.0 [11.0–45.0] months) were enrolled. Seraph® 100 treatment started 66.4 [45.7–80.6] hours after the initial positive blood culture was drawn. During the treatment with the Seraph® 100 with a median blood flow of 285 [225–300] ml/min no device or treatment related adverse events were reported. Blood pressure and heart rate remained stable while peripheral oxygen saturation improved during the treatment from 98.0 [92.5–98.0] to 99.0 [98.0–99.5] %; p = 0.0184. Four patients still had positive blood culture at the start of Seraph® 100 treatment. In one patient blood cultures turned negative during treatment. The time to positivity (TTP) was increased between inflow and outflow blood cultures by 36 [− 7.2 to 96.3] minutes. However, overall TTP increase was not statistical significant. CONCLUSIONS: Seraph® 100 treatment was well tolerated. Adding Seraph® 100 to antibiotics early in the course of bacteremia might result in a faster resolution of bloodstream infections, which has to be evaluated in further studies. Trail registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02914132, first posted September 26, 2016. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-04044-7. BioMed Central 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9205040/ /pubmed/35715801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04044-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Eden, Gabriele
Schmidt, Julius J.
Büttner, Stefan
Kümpers, Philipp
Hafer, Carsten
Rovas, Alexandros
Koch, Benjamin Florian
Schmidt, Bernhard M. W.
Kielstein, Jan T.
Safety and efficacy of the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter to remove bacteria from the blood stream: results of the first in human study
title Safety and efficacy of the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter to remove bacteria from the blood stream: results of the first in human study
title_full Safety and efficacy of the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter to remove bacteria from the blood stream: results of the first in human study
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter to remove bacteria from the blood stream: results of the first in human study
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter to remove bacteria from the blood stream: results of the first in human study
title_short Safety and efficacy of the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter to remove bacteria from the blood stream: results of the first in human study
title_sort safety and efficacy of the seraph® 100 microbind® affinity blood filter to remove bacteria from the blood stream: results of the first in human study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04044-7
work_keys_str_mv AT edengabriele safetyandefficacyoftheseraph100microbindaffinitybloodfiltertoremovebacteriafromthebloodstreamresultsofthefirstinhumanstudy
AT schmidtjuliusj safetyandefficacyoftheseraph100microbindaffinitybloodfiltertoremovebacteriafromthebloodstreamresultsofthefirstinhumanstudy
AT buttnerstefan safetyandefficacyoftheseraph100microbindaffinitybloodfiltertoremovebacteriafromthebloodstreamresultsofthefirstinhumanstudy
AT kumpersphilipp safetyandefficacyoftheseraph100microbindaffinitybloodfiltertoremovebacteriafromthebloodstreamresultsofthefirstinhumanstudy
AT hafercarsten safetyandefficacyoftheseraph100microbindaffinitybloodfiltertoremovebacteriafromthebloodstreamresultsofthefirstinhumanstudy
AT rovasalexandros safetyandefficacyoftheseraph100microbindaffinitybloodfiltertoremovebacteriafromthebloodstreamresultsofthefirstinhumanstudy
AT kochbenjaminflorian safetyandefficacyoftheseraph100microbindaffinitybloodfiltertoremovebacteriafromthebloodstreamresultsofthefirstinhumanstudy
AT schmidtbernhardmw safetyandefficacyoftheseraph100microbindaffinitybloodfiltertoremovebacteriafromthebloodstreamresultsofthefirstinhumanstudy
AT kielsteinjant safetyandefficacyoftheseraph100microbindaffinitybloodfiltertoremovebacteriafromthebloodstreamresultsofthefirstinhumanstudy