Cargando…

Ocular inflammation after agitation of siliconized and silicone oil-free syringes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Noninfectious endophthalmitis may be misdiagnosed, leading to serious clinical implications. So far, its causative factors remain unknown. Therefore, this study assessed the role of silicone oil and syringe agitation in the development of inflammation after intravitreal injection of afli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: da Cruz, Natasha Ferreira Santos, Polizelli, Murilo Ubukata, Muralha, Felipe Picanço, de Morais, Clarice Neuenschwander Lins, Junior, Octaviano Magalhães Silva, Maia, Mauricio, Melo, Gustavo Barreto, Farah, Michel Eid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-022-00387-z
_version_ 1784729053774741504
author da Cruz, Natasha Ferreira Santos
Polizelli, Murilo Ubukata
Muralha, Felipe Picanço
de Morais, Clarice Neuenschwander Lins
Junior, Octaviano Magalhães Silva
Maia, Mauricio
Melo, Gustavo Barreto
Farah, Michel Eid
author_facet da Cruz, Natasha Ferreira Santos
Polizelli, Murilo Ubukata
Muralha, Felipe Picanço
de Morais, Clarice Neuenschwander Lins
Junior, Octaviano Magalhães Silva
Maia, Mauricio
Melo, Gustavo Barreto
Farah, Michel Eid
author_sort da Cruz, Natasha Ferreira Santos
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Noninfectious endophthalmitis may be misdiagnosed, leading to serious clinical implications. So far, its causative factors remain unknown. Therefore, this study assessed the role of silicone oil and syringe agitation in the development of inflammation after intravitreal injection of aflibercept. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial included subjects with an indication of intravitreal antiangiogenic therapy prior to vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Aflibercept was injected 48 h before surgery. The control group received the injection without agitation, while the intervention group was injected with a previously agitated syringe by flicking with either a siliconized or silicone oil-free syringe. The primary endpoint was the presence of anterior chamber reaction (ACR) at 48 h. Aqueous samples were collected and underwent cytometric bead array analysis for quantification of interleukins and chemokines. RESULTS: Forty-one individuals were included (21 in the agitation group and 20 in the no-agitation group). None of the included eyes showed baseline signs of AC cells, hyperemia or pain complaint, while 10% of control group and 80% of agitation group showed AC cells 48 h after injection of aflibercept with SR syringe. There were no differences in the mean variations of all cytokines and chemokines by agitation status. However, there was a marginally significant increase between the mean variations of IP-10 (p = 0.057) and IL-8 (p = 0.058) in the siliconized one. CONCLUSION: This clinical trial discloses a potential role of agitation and siliconized syringes in the development of inflammation after an intravitreal injection of aflibercept. These findings have important clinical implications for all healthcare practitioners who perform intravitreal injections. Trial Registration: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials, RBR-95ddhp. Registered 12 May 2019, http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-95ddhp/
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9205077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92050772022-06-18 Ocular inflammation after agitation of siliconized and silicone oil-free syringes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial da Cruz, Natasha Ferreira Santos Polizelli, Murilo Ubukata Muralha, Felipe Picanço de Morais, Clarice Neuenschwander Lins Junior, Octaviano Magalhães Silva Maia, Mauricio Melo, Gustavo Barreto Farah, Michel Eid Int J Retina Vitreous Original Article BACKGROUND: Noninfectious endophthalmitis may be misdiagnosed, leading to serious clinical implications. So far, its causative factors remain unknown. Therefore, this study assessed the role of silicone oil and syringe agitation in the development of inflammation after intravitreal injection of aflibercept. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial included subjects with an indication of intravitreal antiangiogenic therapy prior to vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Aflibercept was injected 48 h before surgery. The control group received the injection without agitation, while the intervention group was injected with a previously agitated syringe by flicking with either a siliconized or silicone oil-free syringe. The primary endpoint was the presence of anterior chamber reaction (ACR) at 48 h. Aqueous samples were collected and underwent cytometric bead array analysis for quantification of interleukins and chemokines. RESULTS: Forty-one individuals were included (21 in the agitation group and 20 in the no-agitation group). None of the included eyes showed baseline signs of AC cells, hyperemia or pain complaint, while 10% of control group and 80% of agitation group showed AC cells 48 h after injection of aflibercept with SR syringe. There were no differences in the mean variations of all cytokines and chemokines by agitation status. However, there was a marginally significant increase between the mean variations of IP-10 (p = 0.057) and IL-8 (p = 0.058) in the siliconized one. CONCLUSION: This clinical trial discloses a potential role of agitation and siliconized syringes in the development of inflammation after an intravitreal injection of aflibercept. These findings have important clinical implications for all healthcare practitioners who perform intravitreal injections. Trial Registration: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials, RBR-95ddhp. Registered 12 May 2019, http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-95ddhp/ BioMed Central 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9205077/ /pubmed/35715871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-022-00387-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Article
da Cruz, Natasha Ferreira Santos
Polizelli, Murilo Ubukata
Muralha, Felipe Picanço
de Morais, Clarice Neuenschwander Lins
Junior, Octaviano Magalhães Silva
Maia, Mauricio
Melo, Gustavo Barreto
Farah, Michel Eid
Ocular inflammation after agitation of siliconized and silicone oil-free syringes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial
title Ocular inflammation after agitation of siliconized and silicone oil-free syringes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial
title_full Ocular inflammation after agitation of siliconized and silicone oil-free syringes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Ocular inflammation after agitation of siliconized and silicone oil-free syringes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Ocular inflammation after agitation of siliconized and silicone oil-free syringes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial
title_short Ocular inflammation after agitation of siliconized and silicone oil-free syringes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial
title_sort ocular inflammation after agitation of siliconized and silicone oil-free syringes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-022-00387-z
work_keys_str_mv AT dacruznatashaferreirasantos ocularinflammationafteragitationofsiliconizedandsiliconeoilfreesyringesarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT polizellimuriloubukata ocularinflammationafteragitationofsiliconizedandsiliconeoilfreesyringesarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT muralhafelipepicanco ocularinflammationafteragitationofsiliconizedandsiliconeoilfreesyringesarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT demoraisclariceneuenschwanderlins ocularinflammationafteragitationofsiliconizedandsiliconeoilfreesyringesarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT junioroctavianomagalhaessilva ocularinflammationafteragitationofsiliconizedandsiliconeoilfreesyringesarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT maiamauricio ocularinflammationafteragitationofsiliconizedandsiliconeoilfreesyringesarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT melogustavobarreto ocularinflammationafteragitationofsiliconizedandsiliconeoilfreesyringesarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT farahmicheleid ocularinflammationafteragitationofsiliconizedandsiliconeoilfreesyringesarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial