Cargando…
Ocular inflammation after agitation of siliconized and silicone oil-free syringes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Noninfectious endophthalmitis may be misdiagnosed, leading to serious clinical implications. So far, its causative factors remain unknown. Therefore, this study assessed the role of silicone oil and syringe agitation in the development of inflammation after intravitreal injection of afli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-022-00387-z |
_version_ | 1784729053774741504 |
---|---|
author | da Cruz, Natasha Ferreira Santos Polizelli, Murilo Ubukata Muralha, Felipe Picanço de Morais, Clarice Neuenschwander Lins Junior, Octaviano Magalhães Silva Maia, Mauricio Melo, Gustavo Barreto Farah, Michel Eid |
author_facet | da Cruz, Natasha Ferreira Santos Polizelli, Murilo Ubukata Muralha, Felipe Picanço de Morais, Clarice Neuenschwander Lins Junior, Octaviano Magalhães Silva Maia, Mauricio Melo, Gustavo Barreto Farah, Michel Eid |
author_sort | da Cruz, Natasha Ferreira Santos |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Noninfectious endophthalmitis may be misdiagnosed, leading to serious clinical implications. So far, its causative factors remain unknown. Therefore, this study assessed the role of silicone oil and syringe agitation in the development of inflammation after intravitreal injection of aflibercept. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial included subjects with an indication of intravitreal antiangiogenic therapy prior to vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Aflibercept was injected 48 h before surgery. The control group received the injection without agitation, while the intervention group was injected with a previously agitated syringe by flicking with either a siliconized or silicone oil-free syringe. The primary endpoint was the presence of anterior chamber reaction (ACR) at 48 h. Aqueous samples were collected and underwent cytometric bead array analysis for quantification of interleukins and chemokines. RESULTS: Forty-one individuals were included (21 in the agitation group and 20 in the no-agitation group). None of the included eyes showed baseline signs of AC cells, hyperemia or pain complaint, while 10% of control group and 80% of agitation group showed AC cells 48 h after injection of aflibercept with SR syringe. There were no differences in the mean variations of all cytokines and chemokines by agitation status. However, there was a marginally significant increase between the mean variations of IP-10 (p = 0.057) and IL-8 (p = 0.058) in the siliconized one. CONCLUSION: This clinical trial discloses a potential role of agitation and siliconized syringes in the development of inflammation after an intravitreal injection of aflibercept. These findings have important clinical implications for all healthcare practitioners who perform intravitreal injections. Trial Registration: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials, RBR-95ddhp. Registered 12 May 2019, http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-95ddhp/ |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9205077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92050772022-06-18 Ocular inflammation after agitation of siliconized and silicone oil-free syringes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial da Cruz, Natasha Ferreira Santos Polizelli, Murilo Ubukata Muralha, Felipe Picanço de Morais, Clarice Neuenschwander Lins Junior, Octaviano Magalhães Silva Maia, Mauricio Melo, Gustavo Barreto Farah, Michel Eid Int J Retina Vitreous Original Article BACKGROUND: Noninfectious endophthalmitis may be misdiagnosed, leading to serious clinical implications. So far, its causative factors remain unknown. Therefore, this study assessed the role of silicone oil and syringe agitation in the development of inflammation after intravitreal injection of aflibercept. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial included subjects with an indication of intravitreal antiangiogenic therapy prior to vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Aflibercept was injected 48 h before surgery. The control group received the injection without agitation, while the intervention group was injected with a previously agitated syringe by flicking with either a siliconized or silicone oil-free syringe. The primary endpoint was the presence of anterior chamber reaction (ACR) at 48 h. Aqueous samples were collected and underwent cytometric bead array analysis for quantification of interleukins and chemokines. RESULTS: Forty-one individuals were included (21 in the agitation group and 20 in the no-agitation group). None of the included eyes showed baseline signs of AC cells, hyperemia or pain complaint, while 10% of control group and 80% of agitation group showed AC cells 48 h after injection of aflibercept with SR syringe. There were no differences in the mean variations of all cytokines and chemokines by agitation status. However, there was a marginally significant increase between the mean variations of IP-10 (p = 0.057) and IL-8 (p = 0.058) in the siliconized one. CONCLUSION: This clinical trial discloses a potential role of agitation and siliconized syringes in the development of inflammation after an intravitreal injection of aflibercept. These findings have important clinical implications for all healthcare practitioners who perform intravitreal injections. Trial Registration: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials, RBR-95ddhp. Registered 12 May 2019, http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-95ddhp/ BioMed Central 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9205077/ /pubmed/35715871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-022-00387-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Original Article da Cruz, Natasha Ferreira Santos Polizelli, Murilo Ubukata Muralha, Felipe Picanço de Morais, Clarice Neuenschwander Lins Junior, Octaviano Magalhães Silva Maia, Mauricio Melo, Gustavo Barreto Farah, Michel Eid Ocular inflammation after agitation of siliconized and silicone oil-free syringes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial |
title | Ocular inflammation after agitation of siliconized and silicone oil-free syringes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial |
title_full | Ocular inflammation after agitation of siliconized and silicone oil-free syringes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Ocular inflammation after agitation of siliconized and silicone oil-free syringes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Ocular inflammation after agitation of siliconized and silicone oil-free syringes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial |
title_short | Ocular inflammation after agitation of siliconized and silicone oil-free syringes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial |
title_sort | ocular inflammation after agitation of siliconized and silicone oil-free syringes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-022-00387-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dacruznatashaferreirasantos ocularinflammationafteragitationofsiliconizedandsiliconeoilfreesyringesarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial AT polizellimuriloubukata ocularinflammationafteragitationofsiliconizedandsiliconeoilfreesyringesarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial AT muralhafelipepicanco ocularinflammationafteragitationofsiliconizedandsiliconeoilfreesyringesarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial AT demoraisclariceneuenschwanderlins ocularinflammationafteragitationofsiliconizedandsiliconeoilfreesyringesarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial AT junioroctavianomagalhaessilva ocularinflammationafteragitationofsiliconizedandsiliconeoilfreesyringesarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial AT maiamauricio ocularinflammationafteragitationofsiliconizedandsiliconeoilfreesyringesarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial AT melogustavobarreto ocularinflammationafteragitationofsiliconizedandsiliconeoilfreesyringesarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial AT farahmicheleid ocularinflammationafteragitationofsiliconizedandsiliconeoilfreesyringesarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial |