Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of bioceramic and epoxy sealers after using various final irrigants: An in vitro study

AIM: The aim of the study is to compare the push-out bond strength of bioceramic and epoxy sealers after using various final irrigants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hundred single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups (n = 50) according to the sealer used: Group A: Bio C (bioceramic sealer), Group B:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veeramachaneni, Chandrasekhar, Aravelli, Swathi, Dundigalla, Sreeja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35720830
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_10_22
_version_ 1784729107231145984
author Veeramachaneni, Chandrasekhar
Aravelli, Swathi
Dundigalla, Sreeja
author_facet Veeramachaneni, Chandrasekhar
Aravelli, Swathi
Dundigalla, Sreeja
author_sort Veeramachaneni, Chandrasekhar
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of the study is to compare the push-out bond strength of bioceramic and epoxy sealers after using various final irrigants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hundred single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups (n = 50) according to the sealer used: Group A: Bio C (bioceramic sealer), Group B: Dia-Proseal (epoxy sealer). Each group was subdivided into five subgroups (n = 10) according to the final irrigation protocol: Group A1 and B1 – 5% glycolic acid (GA), Group A2 and B2 – 17% GA, Group A3 and B3 – 0.2% chitosan, Group A4 and B4 – 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and Group A5 and B5 – 0.9% saline. Samples were obturated in combination with one of the mentioned sealers and were allowed to set for 1 week. Two horizontal slices were obtained from each sample and subjected to push-out test. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and independent Student's t-test. RESULTS: Both the sealers exhibited higher push-out bond strength after treatment with GA with no significant difference between 5% and 17% GA. Bio C sealer with GA as final irrigant showed higher bond strength than Dia-Proseal (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The push-out bond strength of the sealer was significantly affected by the final irrigation solution used. The highest push-out bond strength was seen with Bio C sealer after treatment with GA with no significant difference between 5% and 17% GA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9205351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92053512022-06-18 Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of bioceramic and epoxy sealers after using various final irrigants: An in vitro study Veeramachaneni, Chandrasekhar Aravelli, Swathi Dundigalla, Sreeja J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The aim of the study is to compare the push-out bond strength of bioceramic and epoxy sealers after using various final irrigants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hundred single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups (n = 50) according to the sealer used: Group A: Bio C (bioceramic sealer), Group B: Dia-Proseal (epoxy sealer). Each group was subdivided into five subgroups (n = 10) according to the final irrigation protocol: Group A1 and B1 – 5% glycolic acid (GA), Group A2 and B2 – 17% GA, Group A3 and B3 – 0.2% chitosan, Group A4 and B4 – 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and Group A5 and B5 – 0.9% saline. Samples were obturated in combination with one of the mentioned sealers and were allowed to set for 1 week. Two horizontal slices were obtained from each sample and subjected to push-out test. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and independent Student's t-test. RESULTS: Both the sealers exhibited higher push-out bond strength after treatment with GA with no significant difference between 5% and 17% GA. Bio C sealer with GA as final irrigant showed higher bond strength than Dia-Proseal (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The push-out bond strength of the sealer was significantly affected by the final irrigation solution used. The highest push-out bond strength was seen with Bio C sealer after treatment with GA with no significant difference between 5% and 17% GA. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9205351/ /pubmed/35720830 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_10_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Veeramachaneni, Chandrasekhar
Aravelli, Swathi
Dundigalla, Sreeja
Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of bioceramic and epoxy sealers after using various final irrigants: An in vitro study
title Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of bioceramic and epoxy sealers after using various final irrigants: An in vitro study
title_full Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of bioceramic and epoxy sealers after using various final irrigants: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of bioceramic and epoxy sealers after using various final irrigants: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of bioceramic and epoxy sealers after using various final irrigants: An in vitro study
title_short Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of bioceramic and epoxy sealers after using various final irrigants: An in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of bioceramic and epoxy sealers after using various final irrigants: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35720830
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_10_22
work_keys_str_mv AT veeramachanenichandrasekhar comparativeevaluationofpushoutbondstrengthofbioceramicandepoxysealersafterusingvariousfinalirrigantsaninvitrostudy
AT aravelliswathi comparativeevaluationofpushoutbondstrengthofbioceramicandepoxysealersafterusingvariousfinalirrigantsaninvitrostudy
AT dundigallasreeja comparativeevaluationofpushoutbondstrengthofbioceramicandepoxysealersafterusingvariousfinalirrigantsaninvitrostudy