Cargando…

A comparative study on mandibular premolar root canal morphology employing cone-beam computed tomography and microcomputed tomography imaging

AIM: The present study was to investigate the root canal morphology of mandibular premolars in Malaysian population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) scanned images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty selected mandibular premolars were evaluated in vitro an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pang, Khor Choo, Raja, Kacharaju Kranthi, Nambiar, Phrabhakaran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35720827
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_606_21
_version_ 1784729107748093952
author Pang, Khor Choo
Raja, Kacharaju Kranthi
Nambiar, Phrabhakaran
author_facet Pang, Khor Choo
Raja, Kacharaju Kranthi
Nambiar, Phrabhakaran
author_sort Pang, Khor Choo
collection PubMed
description AIM: The present study was to investigate the root canal morphology of mandibular premolars in Malaysian population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) scanned images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty selected mandibular premolars were evaluated in vitro and the root canal morphologies of the samples were categorized based on Vertucci's classification. The position of apical foramen, presence, and location of lateral canal, as well as prevalence of apical delta, were also determined. RESULTS: Invariably, Type I variety (Vertucci's classification) was the most frequent root canal morphology followed by Type V and Type III after micro-CT imaging. CBCT investigation also revealed Type I as the most numerous; however, the second most common configuration was Type III followed closely by others. There was a moderate agreement in Vertucci's classification of root canal configuration and also prevalence of apical delta (kappa: 0.516 and 0.550, respectively). However, only a fair agreement (kappa: 0.289) was observed between CBCT and micro-CT on the prevalence of lateral canal. CONCLUSION: CBCT should be cautiously used in determining root canal configuration as deficiencies were evident and revealed during micro-CT imaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9205352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92053522022-06-18 A comparative study on mandibular premolar root canal morphology employing cone-beam computed tomography and microcomputed tomography imaging Pang, Khor Choo Raja, Kacharaju Kranthi Nambiar, Phrabhakaran J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The present study was to investigate the root canal morphology of mandibular premolars in Malaysian population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) scanned images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty selected mandibular premolars were evaluated in vitro and the root canal morphologies of the samples were categorized based on Vertucci's classification. The position of apical foramen, presence, and location of lateral canal, as well as prevalence of apical delta, were also determined. RESULTS: Invariably, Type I variety (Vertucci's classification) was the most frequent root canal morphology followed by Type V and Type III after micro-CT imaging. CBCT investigation also revealed Type I as the most numerous; however, the second most common configuration was Type III followed closely by others. There was a moderate agreement in Vertucci's classification of root canal configuration and also prevalence of apical delta (kappa: 0.516 and 0.550, respectively). However, only a fair agreement (kappa: 0.289) was observed between CBCT and micro-CT on the prevalence of lateral canal. CONCLUSION: CBCT should be cautiously used in determining root canal configuration as deficiencies were evident and revealed during micro-CT imaging. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9205352/ /pubmed/35720827 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_606_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pang, Khor Choo
Raja, Kacharaju Kranthi
Nambiar, Phrabhakaran
A comparative study on mandibular premolar root canal morphology employing cone-beam computed tomography and microcomputed tomography imaging
title A comparative study on mandibular premolar root canal morphology employing cone-beam computed tomography and microcomputed tomography imaging
title_full A comparative study on mandibular premolar root canal morphology employing cone-beam computed tomography and microcomputed tomography imaging
title_fullStr A comparative study on mandibular premolar root canal morphology employing cone-beam computed tomography and microcomputed tomography imaging
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study on mandibular premolar root canal morphology employing cone-beam computed tomography and microcomputed tomography imaging
title_short A comparative study on mandibular premolar root canal morphology employing cone-beam computed tomography and microcomputed tomography imaging
title_sort comparative study on mandibular premolar root canal morphology employing cone-beam computed tomography and microcomputed tomography imaging
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35720827
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_606_21
work_keys_str_mv AT pangkhorchoo acomparativestudyonmandibularpremolarrootcanalmorphologyemployingconebeamcomputedtomographyandmicrocomputedtomographyimaging
AT rajakacharajukranthi acomparativestudyonmandibularpremolarrootcanalmorphologyemployingconebeamcomputedtomographyandmicrocomputedtomographyimaging
AT nambiarphrabhakaran acomparativestudyonmandibularpremolarrootcanalmorphologyemployingconebeamcomputedtomographyandmicrocomputedtomographyimaging
AT pangkhorchoo comparativestudyonmandibularpremolarrootcanalmorphologyemployingconebeamcomputedtomographyandmicrocomputedtomographyimaging
AT rajakacharajukranthi comparativestudyonmandibularpremolarrootcanalmorphologyemployingconebeamcomputedtomographyandmicrocomputedtomographyimaging
AT nambiarphrabhakaran comparativestudyonmandibularpremolarrootcanalmorphologyemployingconebeamcomputedtomographyandmicrocomputedtomographyimaging