Cargando…

Reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots

INTRODUCTION: Endodontic procedure leads to the loss of tooth structure resulting in fractures. Intraorifice barriers of bonded restorative materials placed in the cervical third of tooth may help in increasing fracture resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human mandibular premolars (n = 75) underwent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deshpande, Sharvaree Ratnakar, Gaddalay, Sunanda Laxman, Damade, Yogesh Naresh, Khanvilkar, Unmesh Deepak, Chaudhari, Akshay Satish, Anala, Vaishali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35720832
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_609_21
_version_ 1784729111993778176
author Deshpande, Sharvaree Ratnakar
Gaddalay, Sunanda Laxman
Damade, Yogesh Naresh
Khanvilkar, Unmesh Deepak
Chaudhari, Akshay Satish
Anala, Vaishali
author_facet Deshpande, Sharvaree Ratnakar
Gaddalay, Sunanda Laxman
Damade, Yogesh Naresh
Khanvilkar, Unmesh Deepak
Chaudhari, Akshay Satish
Anala, Vaishali
author_sort Deshpande, Sharvaree Ratnakar
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Endodontic procedure leads to the loss of tooth structure resulting in fractures. Intraorifice barriers of bonded restorative materials placed in the cervical third of tooth may help in increasing fracture resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human mandibular premolars (n = 75) underwent decoronation to adjust working length at 14 mm and prepared up to F3. They were obturated using gutta-percha and resin sealer AH-Plus and randomly divided into five groups (n = 15), Group 1: Control obturated with gutta-percha only. Groups 2, 3, 4, and 5 had placement of intraorifice barriers after the removal of 3 mm coronal gutta-percha such that Group 2: RMGI, Group 3: Self-adhering flowable composite, Group 4: Bulkfill Flowable Composite, and Group 5: mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). Mounting of specimens was done in acrylic resin to expose coronal 3 mm and tested using the universal testing machine. RESULTS: Group 1 (control) showed least fracture strength among all groups. Among those with intraorifice barriers, Group 2 Resin-modified glass ionomer cement showed maximum fracture resistance followed by Group 4 (Bulkfill composite) and Group 5 (self-adhering flowable composite) and least by Group 5 (MTA). CONCLUSION: The type of intraorifice barrier had a significant impact on root fracture resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9205360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92053602022-06-18 Reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots Deshpande, Sharvaree Ratnakar Gaddalay, Sunanda Laxman Damade, Yogesh Naresh Khanvilkar, Unmesh Deepak Chaudhari, Akshay Satish Anala, Vaishali J Conserv Dent Original Article INTRODUCTION: Endodontic procedure leads to the loss of tooth structure resulting in fractures. Intraorifice barriers of bonded restorative materials placed in the cervical third of tooth may help in increasing fracture resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human mandibular premolars (n = 75) underwent decoronation to adjust working length at 14 mm and prepared up to F3. They were obturated using gutta-percha and resin sealer AH-Plus and randomly divided into five groups (n = 15), Group 1: Control obturated with gutta-percha only. Groups 2, 3, 4, and 5 had placement of intraorifice barriers after the removal of 3 mm coronal gutta-percha such that Group 2: RMGI, Group 3: Self-adhering flowable composite, Group 4: Bulkfill Flowable Composite, and Group 5: mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). Mounting of specimens was done in acrylic resin to expose coronal 3 mm and tested using the universal testing machine. RESULTS: Group 1 (control) showed least fracture strength among all groups. Among those with intraorifice barriers, Group 2 Resin-modified glass ionomer cement showed maximum fracture resistance followed by Group 4 (Bulkfill composite) and Group 5 (self-adhering flowable composite) and least by Group 5 (MTA). CONCLUSION: The type of intraorifice barrier had a significant impact on root fracture resistance. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9205360/ /pubmed/35720832 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_609_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Deshpande, Sharvaree Ratnakar
Gaddalay, Sunanda Laxman
Damade, Yogesh Naresh
Khanvilkar, Unmesh Deepak
Chaudhari, Akshay Satish
Anala, Vaishali
Reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots
title Reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots
title_full Reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots
title_fullStr Reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots
title_full_unstemmed Reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots
title_short Reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots
title_sort reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35720832
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_609_21
work_keys_str_mv AT deshpandesharvareeratnakar reinforcingthecervicaldentinwithbondedmaterialstoimprovefractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedroots
AT gaddalaysunandalaxman reinforcingthecervicaldentinwithbondedmaterialstoimprovefractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedroots
AT damadeyogeshnaresh reinforcingthecervicaldentinwithbondedmaterialstoimprovefractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedroots
AT khanvilkarunmeshdeepak reinforcingthecervicaldentinwithbondedmaterialstoimprovefractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedroots
AT chaudhariakshaysatish reinforcingthecervicaldentinwithbondedmaterialstoimprovefractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedroots
AT analavaishali reinforcingthecervicaldentinwithbondedmaterialstoimprovefractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedroots