Cargando…
Reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots
INTRODUCTION: Endodontic procedure leads to the loss of tooth structure resulting in fractures. Intraorifice barriers of bonded restorative materials placed in the cervical third of tooth may help in increasing fracture resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human mandibular premolars (n = 75) underwent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35720832 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_609_21 |
_version_ | 1784729111993778176 |
---|---|
author | Deshpande, Sharvaree Ratnakar Gaddalay, Sunanda Laxman Damade, Yogesh Naresh Khanvilkar, Unmesh Deepak Chaudhari, Akshay Satish Anala, Vaishali |
author_facet | Deshpande, Sharvaree Ratnakar Gaddalay, Sunanda Laxman Damade, Yogesh Naresh Khanvilkar, Unmesh Deepak Chaudhari, Akshay Satish Anala, Vaishali |
author_sort | Deshpande, Sharvaree Ratnakar |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Endodontic procedure leads to the loss of tooth structure resulting in fractures. Intraorifice barriers of bonded restorative materials placed in the cervical third of tooth may help in increasing fracture resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human mandibular premolars (n = 75) underwent decoronation to adjust working length at 14 mm and prepared up to F3. They were obturated using gutta-percha and resin sealer AH-Plus and randomly divided into five groups (n = 15), Group 1: Control obturated with gutta-percha only. Groups 2, 3, 4, and 5 had placement of intraorifice barriers after the removal of 3 mm coronal gutta-percha such that Group 2: RMGI, Group 3: Self-adhering flowable composite, Group 4: Bulkfill Flowable Composite, and Group 5: mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). Mounting of specimens was done in acrylic resin to expose coronal 3 mm and tested using the universal testing machine. RESULTS: Group 1 (control) showed least fracture strength among all groups. Among those with intraorifice barriers, Group 2 Resin-modified glass ionomer cement showed maximum fracture resistance followed by Group 4 (Bulkfill composite) and Group 5 (self-adhering flowable composite) and least by Group 5 (MTA). CONCLUSION: The type of intraorifice barrier had a significant impact on root fracture resistance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9205360 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92053602022-06-18 Reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots Deshpande, Sharvaree Ratnakar Gaddalay, Sunanda Laxman Damade, Yogesh Naresh Khanvilkar, Unmesh Deepak Chaudhari, Akshay Satish Anala, Vaishali J Conserv Dent Original Article INTRODUCTION: Endodontic procedure leads to the loss of tooth structure resulting in fractures. Intraorifice barriers of bonded restorative materials placed in the cervical third of tooth may help in increasing fracture resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human mandibular premolars (n = 75) underwent decoronation to adjust working length at 14 mm and prepared up to F3. They were obturated using gutta-percha and resin sealer AH-Plus and randomly divided into five groups (n = 15), Group 1: Control obturated with gutta-percha only. Groups 2, 3, 4, and 5 had placement of intraorifice barriers after the removal of 3 mm coronal gutta-percha such that Group 2: RMGI, Group 3: Self-adhering flowable composite, Group 4: Bulkfill Flowable Composite, and Group 5: mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). Mounting of specimens was done in acrylic resin to expose coronal 3 mm and tested using the universal testing machine. RESULTS: Group 1 (control) showed least fracture strength among all groups. Among those with intraorifice barriers, Group 2 Resin-modified glass ionomer cement showed maximum fracture resistance followed by Group 4 (Bulkfill composite) and Group 5 (self-adhering flowable composite) and least by Group 5 (MTA). CONCLUSION: The type of intraorifice barrier had a significant impact on root fracture resistance. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9205360/ /pubmed/35720832 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_609_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Deshpande, Sharvaree Ratnakar Gaddalay, Sunanda Laxman Damade, Yogesh Naresh Khanvilkar, Unmesh Deepak Chaudhari, Akshay Satish Anala, Vaishali Reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots |
title | Reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots |
title_full | Reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots |
title_fullStr | Reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots |
title_full_unstemmed | Reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots |
title_short | Reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots |
title_sort | reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35720832 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_609_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deshpandesharvareeratnakar reinforcingthecervicaldentinwithbondedmaterialstoimprovefractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedroots AT gaddalaysunandalaxman reinforcingthecervicaldentinwithbondedmaterialstoimprovefractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedroots AT damadeyogeshnaresh reinforcingthecervicaldentinwithbondedmaterialstoimprovefractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedroots AT khanvilkarunmeshdeepak reinforcingthecervicaldentinwithbondedmaterialstoimprovefractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedroots AT chaudhariakshaysatish reinforcingthecervicaldentinwithbondedmaterialstoimprovefractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedroots AT analavaishali reinforcingthecervicaldentinwithbondedmaterialstoimprovefractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedroots |