Cargando…

The Puzzle of Argument Structure Mismatch in Gapping

Voice mismatch between conjuncts is impossible in the gapping construction. Some recent studies explained this effect by analyzing gapping as involving the ellipsis of a category at least as large as VoiceP. One prediction this analysis makes is that mismatch of any head structurally lower than Voic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Jiayi, Kim, Nayoun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35719600
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.907823
_version_ 1784729119502630912
author Lu, Jiayi
Kim, Nayoun
author_facet Lu, Jiayi
Kim, Nayoun
author_sort Lu, Jiayi
collection PubMed
description Voice mismatch between conjuncts is impossible in the gapping construction. Some recent studies explained this effect by analyzing gapping as involving the ellipsis of a category at least as large as VoiceP. One prediction this analysis makes is that mismatch of any head structurally lower than Voice (e.g., little v) should not be possible in gapping. In this study, through a series of acceptability judgment experiments examining argument structure mismatches in gapping, we provide empirical observations that challenge this prediction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9205392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92053922022-06-18 The Puzzle of Argument Structure Mismatch in Gapping Lu, Jiayi Kim, Nayoun Front Psychol Psychology Voice mismatch between conjuncts is impossible in the gapping construction. Some recent studies explained this effect by analyzing gapping as involving the ellipsis of a category at least as large as VoiceP. One prediction this analysis makes is that mismatch of any head structurally lower than Voice (e.g., little v) should not be possible in gapping. In this study, through a series of acceptability judgment experiments examining argument structure mismatches in gapping, we provide empirical observations that challenge this prediction. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9205392/ /pubmed/35719600 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.907823 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lu and Kim. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Lu, Jiayi
Kim, Nayoun
The Puzzle of Argument Structure Mismatch in Gapping
title The Puzzle of Argument Structure Mismatch in Gapping
title_full The Puzzle of Argument Structure Mismatch in Gapping
title_fullStr The Puzzle of Argument Structure Mismatch in Gapping
title_full_unstemmed The Puzzle of Argument Structure Mismatch in Gapping
title_short The Puzzle of Argument Structure Mismatch in Gapping
title_sort puzzle of argument structure mismatch in gapping
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35719600
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.907823
work_keys_str_mv AT lujiayi thepuzzleofargumentstructuremismatchingapping
AT kimnayoun thepuzzleofargumentstructuremismatchingapping
AT lujiayi puzzleofargumentstructuremismatchingapping
AT kimnayoun puzzleofargumentstructuremismatchingapping