Cargando…

Photorefraction Screening Plus Atropine Treatment for Myopia is Cost-Effective: A Proof-of-Concept Markov Analysis

PURPOSE: The prevalence of myopia is increasing globally, putting individuals at risk of myopia-associated visual impairment. Low-dose atropine eye drops have been found to safely reduce the risk of progression from myopia to higher levels of myopia and pathological states. In New Zealand, school ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Chuen Yen, Boyd, Matt, Wilson, Graham, Hong, Sheng Chiong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35720738
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S362342
_version_ 1784729130805231616
author Hong, Chuen Yen
Boyd, Matt
Wilson, Graham
Hong, Sheng Chiong
author_facet Hong, Chuen Yen
Boyd, Matt
Wilson, Graham
Hong, Sheng Chiong
author_sort Hong, Chuen Yen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The prevalence of myopia is increasing globally, putting individuals at risk of myopia-associated visual impairment. Low-dose atropine eye drops have been found to safely reduce the risk of progression from myopia to higher levels of myopia and pathological states. In New Zealand, school children have an eye check at age 11. In this study, we aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of introducing photorefractive screening for myopia at age 11 in the New Zealand context, with atropine 0.01% eye drops treatment for those screening positive. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A Markov cohort simulation was used to model the impact of screening plus atropine compared to usual care across a lifetime horizon and societal perspective with a 3% discount rate. Cost-effectiveness was determined by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), with utility measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Multivariate sensitivity analyses were carried out to investigate factors influencing cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: The ICER for screening plus atropine was NZ$1590 (95% CI 1390, 1791) per QALY gained, with 7 cases of lifetime blindness prevented per 100,000 children screened. CONCLUSION: Screening for myopia with photorefraction at age 11 and atropine 0.01% eye drop treatment of children screening positive is likely to be cost-effective. These results suggest that a real-world trial and cost-effectiveness analysis would be worth considering in New Zealand.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9205435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92054352022-06-18 Photorefraction Screening Plus Atropine Treatment for Myopia is Cost-Effective: A Proof-of-Concept Markov Analysis Hong, Chuen Yen Boyd, Matt Wilson, Graham Hong, Sheng Chiong Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: The prevalence of myopia is increasing globally, putting individuals at risk of myopia-associated visual impairment. Low-dose atropine eye drops have been found to safely reduce the risk of progression from myopia to higher levels of myopia and pathological states. In New Zealand, school children have an eye check at age 11. In this study, we aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of introducing photorefractive screening for myopia at age 11 in the New Zealand context, with atropine 0.01% eye drops treatment for those screening positive. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A Markov cohort simulation was used to model the impact of screening plus atropine compared to usual care across a lifetime horizon and societal perspective with a 3% discount rate. Cost-effectiveness was determined by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), with utility measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Multivariate sensitivity analyses were carried out to investigate factors influencing cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: The ICER for screening plus atropine was NZ$1590 (95% CI 1390, 1791) per QALY gained, with 7 cases of lifetime blindness prevented per 100,000 children screened. CONCLUSION: Screening for myopia with photorefraction at age 11 and atropine 0.01% eye drop treatment of children screening positive is likely to be cost-effective. These results suggest that a real-world trial and cost-effectiveness analysis would be worth considering in New Zealand. Dove 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9205435/ /pubmed/35720738 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S362342 Text en © 2022 Hong et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Hong, Chuen Yen
Boyd, Matt
Wilson, Graham
Hong, Sheng Chiong
Photorefraction Screening Plus Atropine Treatment for Myopia is Cost-Effective: A Proof-of-Concept Markov Analysis
title Photorefraction Screening Plus Atropine Treatment for Myopia is Cost-Effective: A Proof-of-Concept Markov Analysis
title_full Photorefraction Screening Plus Atropine Treatment for Myopia is Cost-Effective: A Proof-of-Concept Markov Analysis
title_fullStr Photorefraction Screening Plus Atropine Treatment for Myopia is Cost-Effective: A Proof-of-Concept Markov Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Photorefraction Screening Plus Atropine Treatment for Myopia is Cost-Effective: A Proof-of-Concept Markov Analysis
title_short Photorefraction Screening Plus Atropine Treatment for Myopia is Cost-Effective: A Proof-of-Concept Markov Analysis
title_sort photorefraction screening plus atropine treatment for myopia is cost-effective: a proof-of-concept markov analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35720738
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S362342
work_keys_str_mv AT hongchuenyen photorefractionscreeningplusatropinetreatmentformyopiaiscosteffectiveaproofofconceptmarkovanalysis
AT boydmatt photorefractionscreeningplusatropinetreatmentformyopiaiscosteffectiveaproofofconceptmarkovanalysis
AT wilsongraham photorefractionscreeningplusatropinetreatmentformyopiaiscosteffectiveaproofofconceptmarkovanalysis
AT hongshengchiong photorefractionscreeningplusatropinetreatmentformyopiaiscosteffectiveaproofofconceptmarkovanalysis