Cargando…

Evaluating the Academic Influence of Orthopedic Surgeons in Spinal Literature Through Relative Citation Ratio

Introduction: The innovative iCite tool applies the relative citation ratio (RCR) to gauge the time and field-adjusted scientific influence of a publication. This study examines scholarly effects on spine surgery to distinguish the impact made by orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, and several other...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grace, Zachary T, Patel, Harsh, Omari, Ali M, Sanders, Angeline, Imam, Nareena, Koerner, John D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35733502
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25147
_version_ 1784729134363049984
author Grace, Zachary T
Patel, Harsh
Omari, Ali M
Sanders, Angeline
Imam, Nareena
Koerner, John D
author_facet Grace, Zachary T
Patel, Harsh
Omari, Ali M
Sanders, Angeline
Imam, Nareena
Koerner, John D
author_sort Grace, Zachary T
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The innovative iCite tool applies the relative citation ratio (RCR) to gauge the time and field-adjusted scientific influence of a publication. This study examines scholarly effects on spine surgery to distinguish the impact made by orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, and several other specialists. Materials and methods: From 2013 to 2017, 100 of the highest RCR-rated articles were gathered for each of the following terms: cervical disc herniation (CDH), lumbar disc herniation (LDH), lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), neurogenic claudication (NC), radiculopathy (RAD), and sciatica (SC). The first, second, and last authors were queried for background and academic qualifications and placed into the following specialty categories: orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, pain management, medicine, and others. To provide an alternative degree of influence, the Scopus database was employed to classify the h-index associated with each author. Results: Across the six search terms, there were 526 orthopedic surgeons among 1,730 authors (30.4%), with the highest representation in LSS (118/290, 40.7%), and the lowest in SC (45/286, 15.7%). Orthopedics was the most influential specialty across all six research terms by median RCR (p = 0.012). Compared to their neurosurgical counterparts, orthopedic authors had a greater influence in CDH (3.93 vs. 2.63, p = 0.0492), LDH (5.10 vs. 4.99, p = 1.0000), NC (2.16 vs. 1.40, p = 0.2370), and SC (3.35 vs. 3.04, p = 0.5285), but had a lower influence in LSS (5.13 vs. 5.32, p = 0.7736) and RAD (5.03 vs. 6.05, p = 0.3938). Conclusion: Orthopedic surgeons lead other specialties when determining scholarly influence through RCR across six of the pre-designated research domains within spine surgery. For orthopedics, a modest influence in LSS and RAD may suggest potential areas of future focus. The use of bibliometrics to analyze available literature enables us to identify other specialties that have contributed to our field and promote interdisciplinary collaboration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9205450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92054502022-06-21 Evaluating the Academic Influence of Orthopedic Surgeons in Spinal Literature Through Relative Citation Ratio Grace, Zachary T Patel, Harsh Omari, Ali M Sanders, Angeline Imam, Nareena Koerner, John D Cureus Orthopedics Introduction: The innovative iCite tool applies the relative citation ratio (RCR) to gauge the time and field-adjusted scientific influence of a publication. This study examines scholarly effects on spine surgery to distinguish the impact made by orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, and several other specialists. Materials and methods: From 2013 to 2017, 100 of the highest RCR-rated articles were gathered for each of the following terms: cervical disc herniation (CDH), lumbar disc herniation (LDH), lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), neurogenic claudication (NC), radiculopathy (RAD), and sciatica (SC). The first, second, and last authors were queried for background and academic qualifications and placed into the following specialty categories: orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, pain management, medicine, and others. To provide an alternative degree of influence, the Scopus database was employed to classify the h-index associated with each author. Results: Across the six search terms, there were 526 orthopedic surgeons among 1,730 authors (30.4%), with the highest representation in LSS (118/290, 40.7%), and the lowest in SC (45/286, 15.7%). Orthopedics was the most influential specialty across all six research terms by median RCR (p = 0.012). Compared to their neurosurgical counterparts, orthopedic authors had a greater influence in CDH (3.93 vs. 2.63, p = 0.0492), LDH (5.10 vs. 4.99, p = 1.0000), NC (2.16 vs. 1.40, p = 0.2370), and SC (3.35 vs. 3.04, p = 0.5285), but had a lower influence in LSS (5.13 vs. 5.32, p = 0.7736) and RAD (5.03 vs. 6.05, p = 0.3938). Conclusion: Orthopedic surgeons lead other specialties when determining scholarly influence through RCR across six of the pre-designated research domains within spine surgery. For orthopedics, a modest influence in LSS and RAD may suggest potential areas of future focus. The use of bibliometrics to analyze available literature enables us to identify other specialties that have contributed to our field and promote interdisciplinary collaboration. Cureus 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9205450/ /pubmed/35733502 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25147 Text en Copyright © 2022, Grace et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Grace, Zachary T
Patel, Harsh
Omari, Ali M
Sanders, Angeline
Imam, Nareena
Koerner, John D
Evaluating the Academic Influence of Orthopedic Surgeons in Spinal Literature Through Relative Citation Ratio
title Evaluating the Academic Influence of Orthopedic Surgeons in Spinal Literature Through Relative Citation Ratio
title_full Evaluating the Academic Influence of Orthopedic Surgeons in Spinal Literature Through Relative Citation Ratio
title_fullStr Evaluating the Academic Influence of Orthopedic Surgeons in Spinal Literature Through Relative Citation Ratio
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Academic Influence of Orthopedic Surgeons in Spinal Literature Through Relative Citation Ratio
title_short Evaluating the Academic Influence of Orthopedic Surgeons in Spinal Literature Through Relative Citation Ratio
title_sort evaluating the academic influence of orthopedic surgeons in spinal literature through relative citation ratio
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35733502
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25147
work_keys_str_mv AT gracezacharyt evaluatingtheacademicinfluenceoforthopedicsurgeonsinspinalliteraturethroughrelativecitationratio
AT patelharsh evaluatingtheacademicinfluenceoforthopedicsurgeonsinspinalliteraturethroughrelativecitationratio
AT omarialim evaluatingtheacademicinfluenceoforthopedicsurgeonsinspinalliteraturethroughrelativecitationratio
AT sandersangeline evaluatingtheacademicinfluenceoforthopedicsurgeonsinspinalliteraturethroughrelativecitationratio
AT imamnareena evaluatingtheacademicinfluenceoforthopedicsurgeonsinspinalliteraturethroughrelativecitationratio
AT koernerjohnd evaluatingtheacademicinfluenceoforthopedicsurgeonsinspinalliteraturethroughrelativecitationratio