Cargando…
Retinoblastoma seeds: impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging
AIM: To investigate whether the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical category cT2b needs to be subclassified by the type and distribution of retinoblastoma (RB) seeding. METHODS: Multicentre, international registry-based data were collected from RB centres enrolled between January 2001...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34340974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-318892 |
_version_ | 1784729194031218688 |
---|---|
author | Tomar, Ankit Singh Finger, Paul T Gallie, Brenda Kivelä, Tero Mallipatna, Ashwin Zhang, Chengyue Zhao, Junyang Wilson, Matthew Brennan, Rachel Burges, Michala Kim, Jonathan Berry, Jesse L Jubran, Rima Khetan, Vikas Ganeshan, Suganeswari Yarovoy, Andrey Yarovaya, Vera Kotova, Elena Volodin, Denis Yousef, Yacoub Nummi, Kalle Ushakova, Tatiana L Yugay, Olga V Polyakov, Vladimir G Ramirez-Ortiz, Marco Antonio Esparza-Aguiar, Elizabeth Chantada, Guillermo L Schaiquevich, Paula Fandiño, Adriana C Yam, Jason C Lau, Winnie W Lam, Carol P Sharwood, Phillipa Moorthy, Sonia Long, Quah Boon Essuman, Vera Adobea Renner, Lorna A Semenova, Ekaterina Català-Mora, Jaume Correa Llano, Maria Carreras, Elisa |
author_facet | Tomar, Ankit Singh Finger, Paul T Gallie, Brenda Kivelä, Tero Mallipatna, Ashwin Zhang, Chengyue Zhao, Junyang Wilson, Matthew Brennan, Rachel Burges, Michala Kim, Jonathan Berry, Jesse L Jubran, Rima Khetan, Vikas Ganeshan, Suganeswari Yarovoy, Andrey Yarovaya, Vera Kotova, Elena Volodin, Denis Yousef, Yacoub Nummi, Kalle Ushakova, Tatiana L Yugay, Olga V Polyakov, Vladimir G Ramirez-Ortiz, Marco Antonio Esparza-Aguiar, Elizabeth Chantada, Guillermo L Schaiquevich, Paula Fandiño, Adriana C Yam, Jason C Lau, Winnie W Lam, Carol P Sharwood, Phillipa Moorthy, Sonia Long, Quah Boon Essuman, Vera Adobea Renner, Lorna A Semenova, Ekaterina Català-Mora, Jaume Correa Llano, Maria Carreras, Elisa |
author_sort | Tomar, Ankit Singh |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To investigate whether the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical category cT2b needs to be subclassified by the type and distribution of retinoblastoma (RB) seeding. METHODS: Multicentre, international registry-based data were collected from RB centres enrolled between January 2001 and December 2013. 1054 RB eyes with vitreous or subretinal seeds from 18 ophthalmic oncology centres, in 13 countries within six continents were analysed. Local treatment failure was defined as the use of secondary enucleation or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Clinical category cT2b included 1054 eyes. Median age at presentation was 16.0 months. Of these, 428 (40.6%) eyes were salvaged, and 430 (40.8%) were treated with primary and 196 (18.6%) with secondary enucleation. Of the 592 eyes that had complete data for globe salvage analysis, the distribution of seeds was focal in 143 (24.2%) and diffuse in 449 (75.8%). The 5-year Kaplan-Meier cumulative globe-salvage (without EBRT) was 78% and 49% for eyes with focal and diffuse RB seeding, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis confirmed a higher local treatment failure risk with diffuse seeds as compared with focal seeds (hazard rate: 2.8; p<0.001). There was insufficient evidence to prove or disprove an association between vitreous seed type and local treatment failure risk(p=0.06). CONCLUSION: This international, multicentre, registry-based analysis of RB eyes affirmed that eyes with diffuse intraocular distribution of RB seeds at diagnosis had a higher risk of local treatment failure when compared with focal seeds. Subclassification of AJCC RB category cT2b into focal vs diffuse seeds will improve prognostication for eye salvage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9205754 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92057542022-12-21 Retinoblastoma seeds: impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging Tomar, Ankit Singh Finger, Paul T Gallie, Brenda Kivelä, Tero Mallipatna, Ashwin Zhang, Chengyue Zhao, Junyang Wilson, Matthew Brennan, Rachel Burges, Michala Kim, Jonathan Berry, Jesse L Jubran, Rima Khetan, Vikas Ganeshan, Suganeswari Yarovoy, Andrey Yarovaya, Vera Kotova, Elena Volodin, Denis Yousef, Yacoub Nummi, Kalle Ushakova, Tatiana L Yugay, Olga V Polyakov, Vladimir G Ramirez-Ortiz, Marco Antonio Esparza-Aguiar, Elizabeth Chantada, Guillermo L Schaiquevich, Paula Fandiño, Adriana C Yam, Jason C Lau, Winnie W Lam, Carol P Sharwood, Phillipa Moorthy, Sonia Long, Quah Boon Essuman, Vera Adobea Renner, Lorna A Semenova, Ekaterina Català-Mora, Jaume Correa Llano, Maria Carreras, Elisa Br J Ophthalmol Clinical Science AIM: To investigate whether the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical category cT2b needs to be subclassified by the type and distribution of retinoblastoma (RB) seeding. METHODS: Multicentre, international registry-based data were collected from RB centres enrolled between January 2001 and December 2013. 1054 RB eyes with vitreous or subretinal seeds from 18 ophthalmic oncology centres, in 13 countries within six continents were analysed. Local treatment failure was defined as the use of secondary enucleation or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Clinical category cT2b included 1054 eyes. Median age at presentation was 16.0 months. Of these, 428 (40.6%) eyes were salvaged, and 430 (40.8%) were treated with primary and 196 (18.6%) with secondary enucleation. Of the 592 eyes that had complete data for globe salvage analysis, the distribution of seeds was focal in 143 (24.2%) and diffuse in 449 (75.8%). The 5-year Kaplan-Meier cumulative globe-salvage (without EBRT) was 78% and 49% for eyes with focal and diffuse RB seeding, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis confirmed a higher local treatment failure risk with diffuse seeds as compared with focal seeds (hazard rate: 2.8; p<0.001). There was insufficient evidence to prove or disprove an association between vitreous seed type and local treatment failure risk(p=0.06). CONCLUSION: This international, multicentre, registry-based analysis of RB eyes affirmed that eyes with diffuse intraocular distribution of RB seeds at diagnosis had a higher risk of local treatment failure when compared with focal seeds. Subclassification of AJCC RB category cT2b into focal vs diffuse seeds will improve prognostication for eye salvage. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-01 2021-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9205754/ /pubmed/34340974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-318892 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Clinical Science Tomar, Ankit Singh Finger, Paul T Gallie, Brenda Kivelä, Tero Mallipatna, Ashwin Zhang, Chengyue Zhao, Junyang Wilson, Matthew Brennan, Rachel Burges, Michala Kim, Jonathan Berry, Jesse L Jubran, Rima Khetan, Vikas Ganeshan, Suganeswari Yarovoy, Andrey Yarovaya, Vera Kotova, Elena Volodin, Denis Yousef, Yacoub Nummi, Kalle Ushakova, Tatiana L Yugay, Olga V Polyakov, Vladimir G Ramirez-Ortiz, Marco Antonio Esparza-Aguiar, Elizabeth Chantada, Guillermo L Schaiquevich, Paula Fandiño, Adriana C Yam, Jason C Lau, Winnie W Lam, Carol P Sharwood, Phillipa Moorthy, Sonia Long, Quah Boon Essuman, Vera Adobea Renner, Lorna A Semenova, Ekaterina Català-Mora, Jaume Correa Llano, Maria Carreras, Elisa Retinoblastoma seeds: impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging |
title | Retinoblastoma seeds: impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging |
title_full | Retinoblastoma seeds: impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging |
title_fullStr | Retinoblastoma seeds: impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging |
title_full_unstemmed | Retinoblastoma seeds: impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging |
title_short | Retinoblastoma seeds: impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging |
title_sort | retinoblastoma seeds: impact on american joint committee on cancer clinical staging |
topic | Clinical Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34340974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-318892 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tomarankitsingh retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT fingerpault retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT galliebrenda retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT kivelatero retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT mallipatnaashwin retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT zhangchengyue retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT zhaojunyang retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT wilsonmatthew retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT brennanrachel retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT burgesmichala retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT kimjonathan retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT berryjessel retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT jubranrima retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT khetanvikas retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT ganeshansuganeswari retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT yarovoyandrey retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT yarovayavera retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT kotovaelena retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT volodindenis retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT yousefyacoub retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT nummikalle retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT ushakovatatianal retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT yugayolgav retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT polyakovvladimirg retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT ramirezortizmarcoantonio retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT esparzaaguiarelizabeth retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT chantadaguillermol retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT schaiquevichpaula retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT fandinoadrianac retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT yamjasonc retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT lauwinniew retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT lamcarolp retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT sharwoodphillipa retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT moorthysonia retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT longquahboon retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT essumanveraadobea retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT rennerlornaa retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT semenovaekaterina retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT catalamorajaume retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT correallanomaria retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT carreraselisa retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging AT retinoblastomaseedsimpactonamericanjointcommitteeoncancerclinicalstaging |