Cargando…

Effect of socioeconomic factors during the early COVID-19 pandemic: a spatial analysis

BACKGROUND: Spatial variability of COVID-19 cases may suggest geographic disparities of social determinants of health. Spatial analyses of population-level data may provide insight on factors that may contribute to COVID-19 transmission, hospitalization, and death. METHODS: Generalized additive mode...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Ian W., Vieira, Verónica M., Shearer, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13618-7
_version_ 1784729196124176384
author Tang, Ian W.
Vieira, Verónica M.
Shearer, Eric
author_facet Tang, Ian W.
Vieira, Verónica M.
Shearer, Eric
author_sort Tang, Ian W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spatial variability of COVID-19 cases may suggest geographic disparities of social determinants of health. Spatial analyses of population-level data may provide insight on factors that may contribute to COVID-19 transmission, hospitalization, and death. METHODS: Generalized additive models were used to map COVID-19 risk from March 2020 to February 2021 in Orange County (OC), California. We geocoded and analyzed 221,843 cases to OC census tracts within a Poisson framework while smoothing over census tract centroids. Location was randomly permuted 1000 times to test for randomness. We also separated the analyses temporally to observe if risk changed over time. COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths were mapped across OC while adjusting for population-level demographic data in crude and adjusted models. RESULTS: Risk for COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths were statistically significant in northern OC. Adjustment for demographic data substantially decreased spatial risk, but areas remained statistically significant. Inclusion of location within our models considerably decreased the magnitude of risk compared to univariate models. However, percent minority (adjusted RR: 1.06, 95%CI: 1.06, 1.07), average household size (aRR: 1.06, 95%CI: 1.05, 1.07), and percent service industry (aRR: 1.05, 95%CI: 1.04, 1.06) remained significantly associated with COVID-19 risk in adjusted spatial models. In addition, areas of risk did not change between surges and risk ratios were similar for hospitalizations and deaths. CONCLUSION: Significant risk factors and areas of increased risk were identified in OC in our adjusted models and suggests that social and environmental factors contribute to the spread of COVID-19 within communities. Areas in north OC remained significant despite adjustment, but risk substantially decreased. Additional investigation of risk factors may provide insight on how to protect vulnerable populations in future infectious disease outbreaks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9205762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92057622022-06-19 Effect of socioeconomic factors during the early COVID-19 pandemic: a spatial analysis Tang, Ian W. Vieira, Verónica M. Shearer, Eric BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Spatial variability of COVID-19 cases may suggest geographic disparities of social determinants of health. Spatial analyses of population-level data may provide insight on factors that may contribute to COVID-19 transmission, hospitalization, and death. METHODS: Generalized additive models were used to map COVID-19 risk from March 2020 to February 2021 in Orange County (OC), California. We geocoded and analyzed 221,843 cases to OC census tracts within a Poisson framework while smoothing over census tract centroids. Location was randomly permuted 1000 times to test for randomness. We also separated the analyses temporally to observe if risk changed over time. COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths were mapped across OC while adjusting for population-level demographic data in crude and adjusted models. RESULTS: Risk for COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths were statistically significant in northern OC. Adjustment for demographic data substantially decreased spatial risk, but areas remained statistically significant. Inclusion of location within our models considerably decreased the magnitude of risk compared to univariate models. However, percent minority (adjusted RR: 1.06, 95%CI: 1.06, 1.07), average household size (aRR: 1.06, 95%CI: 1.05, 1.07), and percent service industry (aRR: 1.05, 95%CI: 1.04, 1.06) remained significantly associated with COVID-19 risk in adjusted spatial models. In addition, areas of risk did not change between surges and risk ratios were similar for hospitalizations and deaths. CONCLUSION: Significant risk factors and areas of increased risk were identified in OC in our adjusted models and suggests that social and environmental factors contribute to the spread of COVID-19 within communities. Areas in north OC remained significant despite adjustment, but risk substantially decreased. Additional investigation of risk factors may provide insight on how to protect vulnerable populations in future infectious disease outbreaks. BioMed Central 2022-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9205762/ /pubmed/35715743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13618-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tang, Ian W.
Vieira, Verónica M.
Shearer, Eric
Effect of socioeconomic factors during the early COVID-19 pandemic: a spatial analysis
title Effect of socioeconomic factors during the early COVID-19 pandemic: a spatial analysis
title_full Effect of socioeconomic factors during the early COVID-19 pandemic: a spatial analysis
title_fullStr Effect of socioeconomic factors during the early COVID-19 pandemic: a spatial analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of socioeconomic factors during the early COVID-19 pandemic: a spatial analysis
title_short Effect of socioeconomic factors during the early COVID-19 pandemic: a spatial analysis
title_sort effect of socioeconomic factors during the early covid-19 pandemic: a spatial analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13618-7
work_keys_str_mv AT tangianw effectofsocioeconomicfactorsduringtheearlycovid19pandemicaspatialanalysis
AT vieiraveronicam effectofsocioeconomicfactorsduringtheearlycovid19pandemicaspatialanalysis
AT shearereric effectofsocioeconomicfactorsduringtheearlycovid19pandemicaspatialanalysis