Cargando…
Strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs
KEY MESSAGE: Genomic selection maximizes genetic gain by recycling parents to germplasm pool earlier and preserves genetic diversity by restricting the number of fixed alleles and the relationship in pulse breeding programs. ABSTRACT: Using a stochastic computer simulation, we investigated the benef...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35316351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-022-04071-6 |
_version_ | 1784729212832186368 |
---|---|
author | Li, Yongjun Kaur, Sukhjiwan Pembleton, Luke W. Valipour-Kahrood, Hossein Rosewarne, Garry M. Daetwyler, Hans D. |
author_facet | Li, Yongjun Kaur, Sukhjiwan Pembleton, Luke W. Valipour-Kahrood, Hossein Rosewarne, Garry M. Daetwyler, Hans D. |
author_sort | Li, Yongjun |
collection | PubMed |
description | KEY MESSAGE: Genomic selection maximizes genetic gain by recycling parents to germplasm pool earlier and preserves genetic diversity by restricting the number of fixed alleles and the relationship in pulse breeding programs. ABSTRACT: Using a stochastic computer simulation, we investigated the benefit of optimization strategies in the context of genomic selection (GS) for pulse breeding programs. We simulated GS for moderately complex to highly complex traits such as disease resistance, grain weight and grain yield in multiple environments with a high level of genotype-by-environment interaction for grain yield. GS led to higher genetic gain per unit of time and higher genetic diversity loss than phenotypic selection by shortening the breeding cycle time. The genetic gain obtained from selecting the segregating parents early in the breeding cycle (at F(1) or F(2) stages) was substantially higher than selecting at later stages even though prediction accuracy was moderate. Increasing the number of F(1) intercross (F(1i)) families and keeping the total number of progeny of F(1i) families constant, we observed a decrease in genetic gain and increase in genetic diversity, whereas increasing the number of progeny per F(1i) family while keeping a constant number of F(1i) families increased the rate of genetic gain and had higher genetic diversity loss per unit of time. Adding 50 F(2) family phenotypes to the training population increased the accuracy of genomic breeding values (GEBVs) and genetic gain per year and decreased the rate of genetic diversity loss. Genetic diversity could be preserved by applying a strategy that restricted both the percentage of alleles fixed and the average relationship of the group of selected parents to preserve long-term genetic improvement in the pulse breeding program. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00122-022-04071-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9205836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92058362022-06-19 Strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs Li, Yongjun Kaur, Sukhjiwan Pembleton, Luke W. Valipour-Kahrood, Hossein Rosewarne, Garry M. Daetwyler, Hans D. Theor Appl Genet Original Article KEY MESSAGE: Genomic selection maximizes genetic gain by recycling parents to germplasm pool earlier and preserves genetic diversity by restricting the number of fixed alleles and the relationship in pulse breeding programs. ABSTRACT: Using a stochastic computer simulation, we investigated the benefit of optimization strategies in the context of genomic selection (GS) for pulse breeding programs. We simulated GS for moderately complex to highly complex traits such as disease resistance, grain weight and grain yield in multiple environments with a high level of genotype-by-environment interaction for grain yield. GS led to higher genetic gain per unit of time and higher genetic diversity loss than phenotypic selection by shortening the breeding cycle time. The genetic gain obtained from selecting the segregating parents early in the breeding cycle (at F(1) or F(2) stages) was substantially higher than selecting at later stages even though prediction accuracy was moderate. Increasing the number of F(1) intercross (F(1i)) families and keeping the total number of progeny of F(1i) families constant, we observed a decrease in genetic gain and increase in genetic diversity, whereas increasing the number of progeny per F(1i) family while keeping a constant number of F(1i) families increased the rate of genetic gain and had higher genetic diversity loss per unit of time. Adding 50 F(2) family phenotypes to the training population increased the accuracy of genomic breeding values (GEBVs) and genetic gain per year and decreased the rate of genetic diversity loss. Genetic diversity could be preserved by applying a strategy that restricted both the percentage of alleles fixed and the average relationship of the group of selected parents to preserve long-term genetic improvement in the pulse breeding program. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00122-022-04071-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9205836/ /pubmed/35316351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-022-04071-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Li, Yongjun Kaur, Sukhjiwan Pembleton, Luke W. Valipour-Kahrood, Hossein Rosewarne, Garry M. Daetwyler, Hans D. Strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs |
title | Strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs |
title_full | Strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs |
title_fullStr | Strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs |
title_full_unstemmed | Strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs |
title_short | Strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs |
title_sort | strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35316351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-022-04071-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liyongjun strategiesofpreservinggeneticdiversitywhilemaximizinggeneticresponsefromimplementinggenomicselectioninpulsebreedingprograms AT kaursukhjiwan strategiesofpreservinggeneticdiversitywhilemaximizinggeneticresponsefromimplementinggenomicselectioninpulsebreedingprograms AT pembletonlukew strategiesofpreservinggeneticdiversitywhilemaximizinggeneticresponsefromimplementinggenomicselectioninpulsebreedingprograms AT valipourkahroodhossein strategiesofpreservinggeneticdiversitywhilemaximizinggeneticresponsefromimplementinggenomicselectioninpulsebreedingprograms AT rosewarnegarrym strategiesofpreservinggeneticdiversitywhilemaximizinggeneticresponsefromimplementinggenomicselectioninpulsebreedingprograms AT daetwylerhansd strategiesofpreservinggeneticdiversitywhilemaximizinggeneticresponsefromimplementinggenomicselectioninpulsebreedingprograms |