Cargando…

Strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs

KEY MESSAGE: Genomic selection maximizes genetic gain by recycling parents to germplasm pool earlier and preserves genetic diversity by restricting the number of fixed alleles and the relationship in pulse breeding programs. ABSTRACT: Using a stochastic computer simulation, we investigated the benef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yongjun, Kaur, Sukhjiwan, Pembleton, Luke W., Valipour-Kahrood, Hossein, Rosewarne, Garry M., Daetwyler, Hans D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35316351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-022-04071-6
_version_ 1784729212832186368
author Li, Yongjun
Kaur, Sukhjiwan
Pembleton, Luke W.
Valipour-Kahrood, Hossein
Rosewarne, Garry M.
Daetwyler, Hans D.
author_facet Li, Yongjun
Kaur, Sukhjiwan
Pembleton, Luke W.
Valipour-Kahrood, Hossein
Rosewarne, Garry M.
Daetwyler, Hans D.
author_sort Li, Yongjun
collection PubMed
description KEY MESSAGE: Genomic selection maximizes genetic gain by recycling parents to germplasm pool earlier and preserves genetic diversity by restricting the number of fixed alleles and the relationship in pulse breeding programs. ABSTRACT: Using a stochastic computer simulation, we investigated the benefit of optimization strategies in the context of genomic selection (GS) for pulse breeding programs. We simulated GS for moderately complex to highly complex traits such as disease resistance, grain weight and grain yield in multiple environments with a high level of genotype-by-environment interaction for grain yield. GS led to higher genetic gain per unit of time and higher genetic diversity loss than phenotypic selection by shortening the breeding cycle time. The genetic gain obtained from selecting the segregating parents early in the breeding cycle (at F(1) or F(2) stages) was substantially higher than selecting at later stages even though prediction accuracy was moderate. Increasing the number of F(1) intercross (F(1i)) families and keeping the total number of progeny of F(1i) families constant, we observed a decrease in genetic gain and increase in genetic diversity, whereas increasing the number of progeny per F(1i) family while keeping a constant number of F(1i) families increased the rate of genetic gain and had higher genetic diversity loss per unit of time. Adding 50 F(2) family phenotypes to the training population increased the accuracy of genomic breeding values (GEBVs) and genetic gain per year and decreased the rate of genetic diversity loss. Genetic diversity could be preserved by applying a strategy that restricted both the percentage of alleles fixed and the average relationship of the group of selected parents to preserve long-term genetic improvement in the pulse breeding program. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00122-022-04071-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9205836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92058362022-06-19 Strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs Li, Yongjun Kaur, Sukhjiwan Pembleton, Luke W. Valipour-Kahrood, Hossein Rosewarne, Garry M. Daetwyler, Hans D. Theor Appl Genet Original Article KEY MESSAGE: Genomic selection maximizes genetic gain by recycling parents to germplasm pool earlier and preserves genetic diversity by restricting the number of fixed alleles and the relationship in pulse breeding programs. ABSTRACT: Using a stochastic computer simulation, we investigated the benefit of optimization strategies in the context of genomic selection (GS) for pulse breeding programs. We simulated GS for moderately complex to highly complex traits such as disease resistance, grain weight and grain yield in multiple environments with a high level of genotype-by-environment interaction for grain yield. GS led to higher genetic gain per unit of time and higher genetic diversity loss than phenotypic selection by shortening the breeding cycle time. The genetic gain obtained from selecting the segregating parents early in the breeding cycle (at F(1) or F(2) stages) was substantially higher than selecting at later stages even though prediction accuracy was moderate. Increasing the number of F(1) intercross (F(1i)) families and keeping the total number of progeny of F(1i) families constant, we observed a decrease in genetic gain and increase in genetic diversity, whereas increasing the number of progeny per F(1i) family while keeping a constant number of F(1i) families increased the rate of genetic gain and had higher genetic diversity loss per unit of time. Adding 50 F(2) family phenotypes to the training population increased the accuracy of genomic breeding values (GEBVs) and genetic gain per year and decreased the rate of genetic diversity loss. Genetic diversity could be preserved by applying a strategy that restricted both the percentage of alleles fixed and the average relationship of the group of selected parents to preserve long-term genetic improvement in the pulse breeding program. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00122-022-04071-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9205836/ /pubmed/35316351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-022-04071-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Li, Yongjun
Kaur, Sukhjiwan
Pembleton, Luke W.
Valipour-Kahrood, Hossein
Rosewarne, Garry M.
Daetwyler, Hans D.
Strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs
title Strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs
title_full Strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs
title_fullStr Strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs
title_full_unstemmed Strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs
title_short Strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs
title_sort strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35316351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-022-04071-6
work_keys_str_mv AT liyongjun strategiesofpreservinggeneticdiversitywhilemaximizinggeneticresponsefromimplementinggenomicselectioninpulsebreedingprograms
AT kaursukhjiwan strategiesofpreservinggeneticdiversitywhilemaximizinggeneticresponsefromimplementinggenomicselectioninpulsebreedingprograms
AT pembletonlukew strategiesofpreservinggeneticdiversitywhilemaximizinggeneticresponsefromimplementinggenomicselectioninpulsebreedingprograms
AT valipourkahroodhossein strategiesofpreservinggeneticdiversitywhilemaximizinggeneticresponsefromimplementinggenomicselectioninpulsebreedingprograms
AT rosewarnegarrym strategiesofpreservinggeneticdiversitywhilemaximizinggeneticresponsefromimplementinggenomicselectioninpulsebreedingprograms
AT daetwylerhansd strategiesofpreservinggeneticdiversitywhilemaximizinggeneticresponsefromimplementinggenomicselectioninpulsebreedingprograms