Cargando…

Combination of compressed sensing-based iterative reconstruction and offset acquisition for I-123 FP-CIT SPECT: a simulation study

OBJECTIVE(S): The purpose of this study was to validate undersampled single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging using a combination of compressed sensing (CS) iterative reconstruction (CS-IR) and offset acquisition. METHODS: Three types of numerical phantoms were used to evaluate ima...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsutomo, Norikazu, Hashimoto, Takeyuki, Fukami, Mitsuha, Yamamoto, Tomoaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35800416
http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/AOJNMB.2021.59585.1417
_version_ 1784729214648320000
author Matsutomo, Norikazu
Hashimoto, Takeyuki
Fukami, Mitsuha
Yamamoto, Tomoaki
author_facet Matsutomo, Norikazu
Hashimoto, Takeyuki
Fukami, Mitsuha
Yamamoto, Tomoaki
author_sort Matsutomo, Norikazu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE(S): The purpose of this study was to validate undersampled single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging using a combination of compressed sensing (CS) iterative reconstruction (CS-IR) and offset acquisition. METHODS: Three types of numerical phantoms were used to evaluate image quality and quantification derived from CS with offset acquisition. SPECT images were reconstructed using filtered back-projection (FBP), maximum likelihood-expectation maximization (ML-EM), CS-IR, and CS-IR with offset acquisition. The efficacy of CS-IR with offset acquisition was examined in terms of spatial resolution, aspect ratio (ASR), activity concentration linearity, contrast, percent coefficient of variation (%CV), and specific binding ratio (SBR). RESULTS: The full widths at half maximum remained unchanged as the number of projections decreased in CS-IR with offset acquisition. Changes in ASRs and linearities of count density were observed for ML-EM and CS-IR from undersampled projections. The %CV obtained by CS-IR with offset acquisition was substantially lower than that obtained by ML-EM and CS-IR. There were no significant differences between the %CVs obtained from 60 projections by CS-IR with offset acquisition and from 120 projections by FBP. Although the SBRs for CS-IR with offset acquisition tended to be slightly lower than for FBP, the SBRs for CS-IR with offset acquisition did not change with the number of projections. CONCLUSIONS: CS-IR with offset acquisition can provide good image quality and quantification compared with a commonly used SPECT reconstruction method, especially from undersampled projection data. Our proposed method could shorten overall SPECT acquisition times, which would benefit patients and enable quantification with dynamic SPECT acquisitions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9205842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92058422022-07-06 Combination of compressed sensing-based iterative reconstruction and offset acquisition for I-123 FP-CIT SPECT: a simulation study Matsutomo, Norikazu Hashimoto, Takeyuki Fukami, Mitsuha Yamamoto, Tomoaki Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol Original Article OBJECTIVE(S): The purpose of this study was to validate undersampled single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging using a combination of compressed sensing (CS) iterative reconstruction (CS-IR) and offset acquisition. METHODS: Three types of numerical phantoms were used to evaluate image quality and quantification derived from CS with offset acquisition. SPECT images were reconstructed using filtered back-projection (FBP), maximum likelihood-expectation maximization (ML-EM), CS-IR, and CS-IR with offset acquisition. The efficacy of CS-IR with offset acquisition was examined in terms of spatial resolution, aspect ratio (ASR), activity concentration linearity, contrast, percent coefficient of variation (%CV), and specific binding ratio (SBR). RESULTS: The full widths at half maximum remained unchanged as the number of projections decreased in CS-IR with offset acquisition. Changes in ASRs and linearities of count density were observed for ML-EM and CS-IR from undersampled projections. The %CV obtained by CS-IR with offset acquisition was substantially lower than that obtained by ML-EM and CS-IR. There were no significant differences between the %CVs obtained from 60 projections by CS-IR with offset acquisition and from 120 projections by FBP. Although the SBRs for CS-IR with offset acquisition tended to be slightly lower than for FBP, the SBRs for CS-IR with offset acquisition did not change with the number of projections. CONCLUSIONS: CS-IR with offset acquisition can provide good image quality and quantification compared with a commonly used SPECT reconstruction method, especially from undersampled projection data. Our proposed method could shorten overall SPECT acquisition times, which would benefit patients and enable quantification with dynamic SPECT acquisitions. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9205842/ /pubmed/35800416 http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/AOJNMB.2021.59585.1417 Text en © 2022 mums.ac.ir All rights reserved https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Matsutomo, Norikazu
Hashimoto, Takeyuki
Fukami, Mitsuha
Yamamoto, Tomoaki
Combination of compressed sensing-based iterative reconstruction and offset acquisition for I-123 FP-CIT SPECT: a simulation study
title Combination of compressed sensing-based iterative reconstruction and offset acquisition for I-123 FP-CIT SPECT: a simulation study
title_full Combination of compressed sensing-based iterative reconstruction and offset acquisition for I-123 FP-CIT SPECT: a simulation study
title_fullStr Combination of compressed sensing-based iterative reconstruction and offset acquisition for I-123 FP-CIT SPECT: a simulation study
title_full_unstemmed Combination of compressed sensing-based iterative reconstruction and offset acquisition for I-123 FP-CIT SPECT: a simulation study
title_short Combination of compressed sensing-based iterative reconstruction and offset acquisition for I-123 FP-CIT SPECT: a simulation study
title_sort combination of compressed sensing-based iterative reconstruction and offset acquisition for i-123 fp-cit spect: a simulation study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35800416
http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/AOJNMB.2021.59585.1417
work_keys_str_mv AT matsutomonorikazu combinationofcompressedsensingbasediterativereconstructionandoffsetacquisitionfori123fpcitspectasimulationstudy
AT hashimototakeyuki combinationofcompressedsensingbasediterativereconstructionandoffsetacquisitionfori123fpcitspectasimulationstudy
AT fukamimitsuha combinationofcompressedsensingbasediterativereconstructionandoffsetacquisitionfori123fpcitspectasimulationstudy
AT yamamototomoaki combinationofcompressedsensingbasediterativereconstructionandoffsetacquisitionfori123fpcitspectasimulationstudy