Cargando…

A psychophysical and neuroimaging analysis of genital hedonic sensation in men

Current understanding of human genital-brain interactions relates primarily to neuroendocrine and autonomic control, whereas interactions during sexual stimulation remain largely unexplored. Here we present a systematic approach towards identifying how the human brain encodes sensory genital informa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruesink, Gerben B., McGlone, Francis P., Olausson, Håkan, de Jong, Camilla, Marsman, Jan-Bernard, Renken, Remco J., Georgiadis, Janniko R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14020-4
_version_ 1784729224039366656
author Ruesink, Gerben B.
McGlone, Francis P.
Olausson, Håkan
de Jong, Camilla
Marsman, Jan-Bernard
Renken, Remco J.
Georgiadis, Janniko R.
author_facet Ruesink, Gerben B.
McGlone, Francis P.
Olausson, Håkan
de Jong, Camilla
Marsman, Jan-Bernard
Renken, Remco J.
Georgiadis, Janniko R.
author_sort Ruesink, Gerben B.
collection PubMed
description Current understanding of human genital-brain interactions relates primarily to neuroendocrine and autonomic control, whereas interactions during sexual stimulation remain largely unexplored. Here we present a systematic approach towards identifying how the human brain encodes sensory genital information. Using a validated affective touch paradigm and functional magnetic resonance imaging, we found that hedonic responses to discriminatory versus affective tactile stimulation were distinctly different for both penile shaft and forearm. This suggests that, as with other body sites, genital skin contains small diameter mechanoreceptive nerve fibres that signal pleasant touch. In the brain, secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) distinguished between affective and discriminative touch for the penile shaft, but not for the forearm. Frenulum stimulation induced the greatest reports of subjective pleasure and led to the greatest deactivation of the default-mode network. This study represents a first pass at investigating, in humans, the relationship between innervation of genital surfaces, hedonic feelings, and brain mechanisms, in a systematic way.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9205885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92058852022-06-19 A psychophysical and neuroimaging analysis of genital hedonic sensation in men Ruesink, Gerben B. McGlone, Francis P. Olausson, Håkan de Jong, Camilla Marsman, Jan-Bernard Renken, Remco J. Georgiadis, Janniko R. Sci Rep Article Current understanding of human genital-brain interactions relates primarily to neuroendocrine and autonomic control, whereas interactions during sexual stimulation remain largely unexplored. Here we present a systematic approach towards identifying how the human brain encodes sensory genital information. Using a validated affective touch paradigm and functional magnetic resonance imaging, we found that hedonic responses to discriminatory versus affective tactile stimulation were distinctly different for both penile shaft and forearm. This suggests that, as with other body sites, genital skin contains small diameter mechanoreceptive nerve fibres that signal pleasant touch. In the brain, secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) distinguished between affective and discriminative touch for the penile shaft, but not for the forearm. Frenulum stimulation induced the greatest reports of subjective pleasure and led to the greatest deactivation of the default-mode network. This study represents a first pass at investigating, in humans, the relationship between innervation of genital surfaces, hedonic feelings, and brain mechanisms, in a systematic way. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9205885/ /pubmed/35715453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14020-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Ruesink, Gerben B.
McGlone, Francis P.
Olausson, Håkan
de Jong, Camilla
Marsman, Jan-Bernard
Renken, Remco J.
Georgiadis, Janniko R.
A psychophysical and neuroimaging analysis of genital hedonic sensation in men
title A psychophysical and neuroimaging analysis of genital hedonic sensation in men
title_full A psychophysical and neuroimaging analysis of genital hedonic sensation in men
title_fullStr A psychophysical and neuroimaging analysis of genital hedonic sensation in men
title_full_unstemmed A psychophysical and neuroimaging analysis of genital hedonic sensation in men
title_short A psychophysical and neuroimaging analysis of genital hedonic sensation in men
title_sort psychophysical and neuroimaging analysis of genital hedonic sensation in men
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14020-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ruesinkgerbenb apsychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen
AT mcglonefrancisp apsychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen
AT olaussonhakan apsychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen
AT dejongcamilla apsychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen
AT marsmanjanbernard apsychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen
AT renkenremcoj apsychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen
AT georgiadisjannikor apsychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen
AT ruesinkgerbenb psychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen
AT mcglonefrancisp psychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen
AT olaussonhakan psychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen
AT dejongcamilla psychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen
AT marsmanjanbernard psychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen
AT renkenremcoj psychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen
AT georgiadisjannikor psychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen