Cargando…
A psychophysical and neuroimaging analysis of genital hedonic sensation in men
Current understanding of human genital-brain interactions relates primarily to neuroendocrine and autonomic control, whereas interactions during sexual stimulation remain largely unexplored. Here we present a systematic approach towards identifying how the human brain encodes sensory genital informa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14020-4 |
_version_ | 1784729224039366656 |
---|---|
author | Ruesink, Gerben B. McGlone, Francis P. Olausson, Håkan de Jong, Camilla Marsman, Jan-Bernard Renken, Remco J. Georgiadis, Janniko R. |
author_facet | Ruesink, Gerben B. McGlone, Francis P. Olausson, Håkan de Jong, Camilla Marsman, Jan-Bernard Renken, Remco J. Georgiadis, Janniko R. |
author_sort | Ruesink, Gerben B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current understanding of human genital-brain interactions relates primarily to neuroendocrine and autonomic control, whereas interactions during sexual stimulation remain largely unexplored. Here we present a systematic approach towards identifying how the human brain encodes sensory genital information. Using a validated affective touch paradigm and functional magnetic resonance imaging, we found that hedonic responses to discriminatory versus affective tactile stimulation were distinctly different for both penile shaft and forearm. This suggests that, as with other body sites, genital skin contains small diameter mechanoreceptive nerve fibres that signal pleasant touch. In the brain, secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) distinguished between affective and discriminative touch for the penile shaft, but not for the forearm. Frenulum stimulation induced the greatest reports of subjective pleasure and led to the greatest deactivation of the default-mode network. This study represents a first pass at investigating, in humans, the relationship between innervation of genital surfaces, hedonic feelings, and brain mechanisms, in a systematic way. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9205885 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92058852022-06-19 A psychophysical and neuroimaging analysis of genital hedonic sensation in men Ruesink, Gerben B. McGlone, Francis P. Olausson, Håkan de Jong, Camilla Marsman, Jan-Bernard Renken, Remco J. Georgiadis, Janniko R. Sci Rep Article Current understanding of human genital-brain interactions relates primarily to neuroendocrine and autonomic control, whereas interactions during sexual stimulation remain largely unexplored. Here we present a systematic approach towards identifying how the human brain encodes sensory genital information. Using a validated affective touch paradigm and functional magnetic resonance imaging, we found that hedonic responses to discriminatory versus affective tactile stimulation were distinctly different for both penile shaft and forearm. This suggests that, as with other body sites, genital skin contains small diameter mechanoreceptive nerve fibres that signal pleasant touch. In the brain, secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) distinguished between affective and discriminative touch for the penile shaft, but not for the forearm. Frenulum stimulation induced the greatest reports of subjective pleasure and led to the greatest deactivation of the default-mode network. This study represents a first pass at investigating, in humans, the relationship between innervation of genital surfaces, hedonic feelings, and brain mechanisms, in a systematic way. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9205885/ /pubmed/35715453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14020-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Ruesink, Gerben B. McGlone, Francis P. Olausson, Håkan de Jong, Camilla Marsman, Jan-Bernard Renken, Remco J. Georgiadis, Janniko R. A psychophysical and neuroimaging analysis of genital hedonic sensation in men |
title | A psychophysical and neuroimaging analysis of genital hedonic sensation in men |
title_full | A psychophysical and neuroimaging analysis of genital hedonic sensation in men |
title_fullStr | A psychophysical and neuroimaging analysis of genital hedonic sensation in men |
title_full_unstemmed | A psychophysical and neuroimaging analysis of genital hedonic sensation in men |
title_short | A psychophysical and neuroimaging analysis of genital hedonic sensation in men |
title_sort | psychophysical and neuroimaging analysis of genital hedonic sensation in men |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14020-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruesinkgerbenb apsychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen AT mcglonefrancisp apsychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen AT olaussonhakan apsychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen AT dejongcamilla apsychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen AT marsmanjanbernard apsychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen AT renkenremcoj apsychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen AT georgiadisjannikor apsychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen AT ruesinkgerbenb psychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen AT mcglonefrancisp psychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen AT olaussonhakan psychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen AT dejongcamilla psychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen AT marsmanjanbernard psychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen AT renkenremcoj psychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen AT georgiadisjannikor psychophysicalandneuroimaginganalysisofgenitalhedonicsensationinmen |