Cargando…

Moisture retention of glycerin solutions with various concentrations: a comparative study

Various methods of evaluating a humectant’s moisture retention have unique mechanisms. Hence, for designing advanced or efficient ingredients of cosmetic products, a clear understanding of differences among methods is required. The aim of this study was to analyze the moisture-retention capacity of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, H. J., Lee, P. Y., Chen, C. Y., Huang, S. L., Huang, B. W., Dai, F. J., Chau, C. F., Chen, C. S., Lin, Y. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13452-2
_version_ 1784729231439167488
author Chen, H. J.
Lee, P. Y.
Chen, C. Y.
Huang, S. L.
Huang, B. W.
Dai, F. J.
Chau, C. F.
Chen, C. S.
Lin, Y. S.
author_facet Chen, H. J.
Lee, P. Y.
Chen, C. Y.
Huang, S. L.
Huang, B. W.
Dai, F. J.
Chau, C. F.
Chen, C. S.
Lin, Y. S.
author_sort Chen, H. J.
collection PubMed
description Various methods of evaluating a humectant’s moisture retention have unique mechanisms. Hence, for designing advanced or efficient ingredients of cosmetic products, a clear understanding of differences among methods is required. The aim of this study was to analyze the moisture-retention capacity of glycerin, a common ingredient in cosmetic products. Specifically, this study applied gravimetric analysis, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) analysis, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to examine the evaporation of glycerin solutions of different concentrations. The results revealed that the moisture-retention capacity of glycerin increased with the glycerin concentration from 0 to 60 wt%, and glycerin at concentration of 60–70 wt% did not exhibit weight change during the evaporation process. When the glycerin concentration exceeded 70 wt%, moisture sorption occurred in the glycerin solution. Furthermore, the results revealed a deviation between the evaporation rates measured using gravimetric analysis and those measured using TEWL analysis. However, normalizing the results of these analyses yielded the relative evaporation rates to water, which were consistent between these two analyses. DSC thermograms further confirmed the consistent results and identified two hydrated water microstructures (nonfreezable water and free water) in the glycerin solutions, which explained why the measured evaporation rate decreased with the glycerin concentration. These findings can be applied to prove the moisture-retention capacity of a humectant in cosmetic products by different measuring methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9205919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92059192022-06-19 Moisture retention of glycerin solutions with various concentrations: a comparative study Chen, H. J. Lee, P. Y. Chen, C. Y. Huang, S. L. Huang, B. W. Dai, F. J. Chau, C. F. Chen, C. S. Lin, Y. S. Sci Rep Article Various methods of evaluating a humectant’s moisture retention have unique mechanisms. Hence, for designing advanced or efficient ingredients of cosmetic products, a clear understanding of differences among methods is required. The aim of this study was to analyze the moisture-retention capacity of glycerin, a common ingredient in cosmetic products. Specifically, this study applied gravimetric analysis, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) analysis, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to examine the evaporation of glycerin solutions of different concentrations. The results revealed that the moisture-retention capacity of glycerin increased with the glycerin concentration from 0 to 60 wt%, and glycerin at concentration of 60–70 wt% did not exhibit weight change during the evaporation process. When the glycerin concentration exceeded 70 wt%, moisture sorption occurred in the glycerin solution. Furthermore, the results revealed a deviation between the evaporation rates measured using gravimetric analysis and those measured using TEWL analysis. However, normalizing the results of these analyses yielded the relative evaporation rates to water, which were consistent between these two analyses. DSC thermograms further confirmed the consistent results and identified two hydrated water microstructures (nonfreezable water and free water) in the glycerin solutions, which explained why the measured evaporation rate decreased with the glycerin concentration. These findings can be applied to prove the moisture-retention capacity of a humectant in cosmetic products by different measuring methods. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9205919/ /pubmed/35715536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13452-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Chen, H. J.
Lee, P. Y.
Chen, C. Y.
Huang, S. L.
Huang, B. W.
Dai, F. J.
Chau, C. F.
Chen, C. S.
Lin, Y. S.
Moisture retention of glycerin solutions with various concentrations: a comparative study
title Moisture retention of glycerin solutions with various concentrations: a comparative study
title_full Moisture retention of glycerin solutions with various concentrations: a comparative study
title_fullStr Moisture retention of glycerin solutions with various concentrations: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Moisture retention of glycerin solutions with various concentrations: a comparative study
title_short Moisture retention of glycerin solutions with various concentrations: a comparative study
title_sort moisture retention of glycerin solutions with various concentrations: a comparative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13452-2
work_keys_str_mv AT chenhj moistureretentionofglycerinsolutionswithvariousconcentrationsacomparativestudy
AT leepy moistureretentionofglycerinsolutionswithvariousconcentrationsacomparativestudy
AT chency moistureretentionofglycerinsolutionswithvariousconcentrationsacomparativestudy
AT huangsl moistureretentionofglycerinsolutionswithvariousconcentrationsacomparativestudy
AT huangbw moistureretentionofglycerinsolutionswithvariousconcentrationsacomparativestudy
AT daifj moistureretentionofglycerinsolutionswithvariousconcentrationsacomparativestudy
AT chaucf moistureretentionofglycerinsolutionswithvariousconcentrationsacomparativestudy
AT chencs moistureretentionofglycerinsolutionswithvariousconcentrationsacomparativestudy
AT linys moistureretentionofglycerinsolutionswithvariousconcentrationsacomparativestudy