Cargando…

Support for mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping cannot be explained only by task mechanics

Successful object interaction during daily living involves maintaining the grasped object in static equilibrium by properly arranging the fingertip contact forces. According to the mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping, during torque production tasks, fingers with longer moment arms would prod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajakumar, Banuvathy, Dutta, Swarnab, Varadhan, S. K. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14014-2
_version_ 1784729253985648640
author Rajakumar, Banuvathy
Dutta, Swarnab
Varadhan, S. K. M.
author_facet Rajakumar, Banuvathy
Dutta, Swarnab
Varadhan, S. K. M.
author_sort Rajakumar, Banuvathy
collection PubMed
description Successful object interaction during daily living involves maintaining the grasped object in static equilibrium by properly arranging the fingertip contact forces. According to the mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping, during torque production tasks, fingers with longer moment arms would produce greater normal force than those with shorter moment arms. Previous studies have probed this hypothesis by investigating the force contributions of individual fingers through systematic variations (or perturbations) of the properties of the grasped handle. In the current study, we examined the validity of this hypothesis in a paradigm wherein the thumb tangential force was constrained to a minimal constant magnitude. This was achieved by placing the thumb on a freely movable slider platform. The total mass of the handle was systematically varied by adding external loads directly below the center of mass of the handle. Our findings suggest that the mechanical advantage hypothesis manifests only during the heaviest loading condition when a threshold difficulty is reached. We infer that the support for the mechanical advantage hypothesis depends not only on the physical parameters but also on the individual ability to manage the task.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9206022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92060222022-06-19 Support for mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping cannot be explained only by task mechanics Rajakumar, Banuvathy Dutta, Swarnab Varadhan, S. K. M. Sci Rep Article Successful object interaction during daily living involves maintaining the grasped object in static equilibrium by properly arranging the fingertip contact forces. According to the mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping, during torque production tasks, fingers with longer moment arms would produce greater normal force than those with shorter moment arms. Previous studies have probed this hypothesis by investigating the force contributions of individual fingers through systematic variations (or perturbations) of the properties of the grasped handle. In the current study, we examined the validity of this hypothesis in a paradigm wherein the thumb tangential force was constrained to a minimal constant magnitude. This was achieved by placing the thumb on a freely movable slider platform. The total mass of the handle was systematically varied by adding external loads directly below the center of mass of the handle. Our findings suggest that the mechanical advantage hypothesis manifests only during the heaviest loading condition when a threshold difficulty is reached. We infer that the support for the mechanical advantage hypothesis depends not only on the physical parameters but also on the individual ability to manage the task. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9206022/ /pubmed/35715473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14014-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Rajakumar, Banuvathy
Dutta, Swarnab
Varadhan, S. K. M.
Support for mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping cannot be explained only by task mechanics
title Support for mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping cannot be explained only by task mechanics
title_full Support for mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping cannot be explained only by task mechanics
title_fullStr Support for mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping cannot be explained only by task mechanics
title_full_unstemmed Support for mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping cannot be explained only by task mechanics
title_short Support for mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping cannot be explained only by task mechanics
title_sort support for mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping cannot be explained only by task mechanics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14014-2
work_keys_str_mv AT rajakumarbanuvathy supportformechanicaladvantagehypothesisofgraspingcannotbeexplainedonlybytaskmechanics
AT duttaswarnab supportformechanicaladvantagehypothesisofgraspingcannotbeexplainedonlybytaskmechanics
AT varadhanskm supportformechanicaladvantagehypothesisofgraspingcannotbeexplainedonlybytaskmechanics