Cargando…

Ordering of computed tomography scans for head and cervical spine: a qualitative study exploring influences on doctors’ decision-making

BACKGROUND: Ordering of computed tomography (CT) scans needs to consideration of diagnostic utility as well as resource utilisation and radiation exposure. Several factors influence ordering decisions, including evidence-based clinical decision support tools to rule out serious disease. The aim of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hattingh, H. Laetitia, Michaleff, Zoe Alexandra, Fawzy, Peter, Du, Leanne, Willcocks, Karlene, Tan, K. Meng, Keijzers, Gerben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35717206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08156-2
_version_ 1784729267207143424
author Hattingh, H. Laetitia
Michaleff, Zoe Alexandra
Fawzy, Peter
Du, Leanne
Willcocks, Karlene
Tan, K. Meng
Keijzers, Gerben
author_facet Hattingh, H. Laetitia
Michaleff, Zoe Alexandra
Fawzy, Peter
Du, Leanne
Willcocks, Karlene
Tan, K. Meng
Keijzers, Gerben
author_sort Hattingh, H. Laetitia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ordering of computed tomography (CT) scans needs to consideration of diagnostic utility as well as resource utilisation and radiation exposure. Several factors influence ordering decisions, including evidence-based clinical decision support tools to rule out serious disease. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore factors influencing Emergency Department (ED) doctors’ decisions to order CT of the head or cervical spine. METHODS: In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with purposively selected ED doctors from two affiliated public hospitals. An interview tool with 10 questions, including three hypothetical scenarios, was developed and validated to guide discussions. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and compared with field notes. Transcribed data were imported into NVivo Release 1.3 to facilitate coding and thematic analysis. RESULTS: In total 21 doctors participated in semi-structured interviews between February and December 2020; mean interview duration was 35 min. Data saturation was reached. Participants ranged from first-year interns to experienced consultants. Five overarching emerging themes were: 1) health system and local context, 2) work structure and support, 3) professional practices and responsibility, 4) reliable patient information, and 5) holistic patient-centred care. Mapping of themes and sub-themes against a behaviour change model provided a basis for future interventions. CONCLUSIONS: CT ordering is complex and multifaceted. Multiple factors are considered by ED doctors during decisions to order CT scans for head or c-spine injuries. Increased education on the use of clinical decision support tools and an overall strategy to improve awareness of low-value care is needed. Strategies to reduce low-yield CT ordering will need to be sustainable, sophisticated and supportive to achieve lasting change. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08156-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9206095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92060952022-06-19 Ordering of computed tomography scans for head and cervical spine: a qualitative study exploring influences on doctors’ decision-making Hattingh, H. Laetitia Michaleff, Zoe Alexandra Fawzy, Peter Du, Leanne Willcocks, Karlene Tan, K. Meng Keijzers, Gerben BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Ordering of computed tomography (CT) scans needs to consideration of diagnostic utility as well as resource utilisation and radiation exposure. Several factors influence ordering decisions, including evidence-based clinical decision support tools to rule out serious disease. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore factors influencing Emergency Department (ED) doctors’ decisions to order CT of the head or cervical spine. METHODS: In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with purposively selected ED doctors from two affiliated public hospitals. An interview tool with 10 questions, including three hypothetical scenarios, was developed and validated to guide discussions. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and compared with field notes. Transcribed data were imported into NVivo Release 1.3 to facilitate coding and thematic analysis. RESULTS: In total 21 doctors participated in semi-structured interviews between February and December 2020; mean interview duration was 35 min. Data saturation was reached. Participants ranged from first-year interns to experienced consultants. Five overarching emerging themes were: 1) health system and local context, 2) work structure and support, 3) professional practices and responsibility, 4) reliable patient information, and 5) holistic patient-centred care. Mapping of themes and sub-themes against a behaviour change model provided a basis for future interventions. CONCLUSIONS: CT ordering is complex and multifaceted. Multiple factors are considered by ED doctors during decisions to order CT scans for head or c-spine injuries. Increased education on the use of clinical decision support tools and an overall strategy to improve awareness of low-value care is needed. Strategies to reduce low-yield CT ordering will need to be sustainable, sophisticated and supportive to achieve lasting change. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08156-2. BioMed Central 2022-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9206095/ /pubmed/35717206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08156-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hattingh, H. Laetitia
Michaleff, Zoe Alexandra
Fawzy, Peter
Du, Leanne
Willcocks, Karlene
Tan, K. Meng
Keijzers, Gerben
Ordering of computed tomography scans for head and cervical spine: a qualitative study exploring influences on doctors’ decision-making
title Ordering of computed tomography scans for head and cervical spine: a qualitative study exploring influences on doctors’ decision-making
title_full Ordering of computed tomography scans for head and cervical spine: a qualitative study exploring influences on doctors’ decision-making
title_fullStr Ordering of computed tomography scans for head and cervical spine: a qualitative study exploring influences on doctors’ decision-making
title_full_unstemmed Ordering of computed tomography scans for head and cervical spine: a qualitative study exploring influences on doctors’ decision-making
title_short Ordering of computed tomography scans for head and cervical spine: a qualitative study exploring influences on doctors’ decision-making
title_sort ordering of computed tomography scans for head and cervical spine: a qualitative study exploring influences on doctors’ decision-making
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35717206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08156-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hattinghhlaetitia orderingofcomputedtomographyscansforheadandcervicalspineaqualitativestudyexploringinfluencesondoctorsdecisionmaking
AT michaleffzoealexandra orderingofcomputedtomographyscansforheadandcervicalspineaqualitativestudyexploringinfluencesondoctorsdecisionmaking
AT fawzypeter orderingofcomputedtomographyscansforheadandcervicalspineaqualitativestudyexploringinfluencesondoctorsdecisionmaking
AT duleanne orderingofcomputedtomographyscansforheadandcervicalspineaqualitativestudyexploringinfluencesondoctorsdecisionmaking
AT willcockskarlene orderingofcomputedtomographyscansforheadandcervicalspineaqualitativestudyexploringinfluencesondoctorsdecisionmaking
AT tankmeng orderingofcomputedtomographyscansforheadandcervicalspineaqualitativestudyexploringinfluencesondoctorsdecisionmaking
AT keijzersgerben orderingofcomputedtomographyscansforheadandcervicalspineaqualitativestudyexploringinfluencesondoctorsdecisionmaking