Cargando…
Computerized Psychological Interventions in Veterans and Service Members: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
BACKGROUND: Computerized psychological interventions can overcome logistical and psychosocial barriers to the use of mental health care in the Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense settings. OBJECTIVE: In this systematic review, we aim to outline the existing literature, with the goal of descri...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35657663 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30065 |
_version_ | 1784729286642499584 |
---|---|
author | Pearson, Rahel Carl, Emily Creech, Suzannah K |
author_facet | Pearson, Rahel Carl, Emily Creech, Suzannah K |
author_sort | Pearson, Rahel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Computerized psychological interventions can overcome logistical and psychosocial barriers to the use of mental health care in the Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense settings. OBJECTIVE: In this systematic review, we aim to outline the existing literature, with the goal of describing: the scope and quality of the available literature, intervention characteristics, study methods, study efficacy, and study limitations and potential directions for future research. METHODS: Systematic searches of two databases (PsycINFO and PubMed) using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were conducted from inception until November 15, 2020. The following inclusion criteria were used: the study was published in an English language peer-reviewed journal, participants were randomly allocated to a computerized psychological intervention or a control group (non–computerized psychological intervention active treatment or nonactive control group), an intervention in at least one treatment arm was primarily delivered through the computer or internet with or without additional support, participants were veterans or service members, and the study used validated measures to examine the effect of treatment on psychological outcomes. RESULTS: This review included 23 studies that met the predefined inclusion criteria. Most studies were at a high risk of bias. Targeted outcomes, participant characteristics, type of support delivered, adherence, and participant satisfaction were described. Most of the examined interventions (19/24, 79%) yielded positive results. Study limitations included participant characteristics limiting study inference, high rates of attrition, and an overreliance on self-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively few high-quality studies were identified, and more rigorous investigations are needed. Several recommendations for future research are discussed, including the adoption of methods that minimize attrition, optimize use, and allow for personalization of treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9206197 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92061972022-06-19 Computerized Psychological Interventions in Veterans and Service Members: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Pearson, Rahel Carl, Emily Creech, Suzannah K J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Computerized psychological interventions can overcome logistical and psychosocial barriers to the use of mental health care in the Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense settings. OBJECTIVE: In this systematic review, we aim to outline the existing literature, with the goal of describing: the scope and quality of the available literature, intervention characteristics, study methods, study efficacy, and study limitations and potential directions for future research. METHODS: Systematic searches of two databases (PsycINFO and PubMed) using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were conducted from inception until November 15, 2020. The following inclusion criteria were used: the study was published in an English language peer-reviewed journal, participants were randomly allocated to a computerized psychological intervention or a control group (non–computerized psychological intervention active treatment or nonactive control group), an intervention in at least one treatment arm was primarily delivered through the computer or internet with or without additional support, participants were veterans or service members, and the study used validated measures to examine the effect of treatment on psychological outcomes. RESULTS: This review included 23 studies that met the predefined inclusion criteria. Most studies were at a high risk of bias. Targeted outcomes, participant characteristics, type of support delivered, adherence, and participant satisfaction were described. Most of the examined interventions (19/24, 79%) yielded positive results. Study limitations included participant characteristics limiting study inference, high rates of attrition, and an overreliance on self-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively few high-quality studies were identified, and more rigorous investigations are needed. Several recommendations for future research are discussed, including the adoption of methods that minimize attrition, optimize use, and allow for personalization of treatment. JMIR Publications 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9206197/ /pubmed/35657663 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30065 Text en ©Rahel Pearson, Emily Carl, Suzannah K Creech. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 03.06.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Pearson, Rahel Carl, Emily Creech, Suzannah K Computerized Psychological Interventions in Veterans and Service Members: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Computerized Psychological Interventions in Veterans and Service Members: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Computerized Psychological Interventions in Veterans and Service Members: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Computerized Psychological Interventions in Veterans and Service Members: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Computerized Psychological Interventions in Veterans and Service Members: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Computerized Psychological Interventions in Veterans and Service Members: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | computerized psychological interventions in veterans and service members: systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35657663 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pearsonrahel computerizedpsychologicalinterventionsinveteransandservicememberssystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT carlemily computerizedpsychologicalinterventionsinveteransandservicememberssystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT creechsuzannahk computerizedpsychologicalinterventionsinveteransandservicememberssystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |