Cargando…

Comparative efficacy of traditional conservative treatment and CT-guided local chemotherapy for mild spinal tuberculosis

BACKGROUND: There are considerable differences in the treatment strategy for spinal tuberculosis, including conservative or surgical procedures. Conservative treatment is always suitable for most patients. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of traditional conservative treatment with C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Yangyang, Xu, Meitao, Li, Lei, Gu, Bin, Zhang, Zehua, Diao, Wenbo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35717153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05545-w
_version_ 1784729320192737280
author Guo, Yangyang
Xu, Meitao
Li, Lei
Gu, Bin
Zhang, Zehua
Diao, Wenbo
author_facet Guo, Yangyang
Xu, Meitao
Li, Lei
Gu, Bin
Zhang, Zehua
Diao, Wenbo
author_sort Guo, Yangyang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are considerable differences in the treatment strategy for spinal tuberculosis, including conservative or surgical procedures. Conservative treatment is always suitable for most patients. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of traditional conservative treatment with CT-guided local chemotherapy strategy of mild spinal tuberculosis. METHODS: This research retrospectively analysed 120 patients with spinal tuberculosis between January 2005 and January 2016 according to the diagnostic criteria of mild spinal tuberculosis. In total, 89 patients underwent traditional conservative treatment, 31 underwent CT-guided local chemotherapy. Clinical outcome, laboratory indexes, and radiological results were analysed to provide a clinical basis for the choice of mild spinal tuberculosis treatment. RESULTS: All cases achieved a clinical cure with 24 to 50 months followed up. Cobb angle of the two groups spinal tuberculosis segments was 6.25 ± 3.1100B0, 5.69 ± 2.5800B0 before treatment and 12.36 ± 6.3100B0, 14.87 ± 7.2600B0 after treatment, respectively. The VAS scores were significantly decreased post-treatment. At the 1 month follow-up, the VAS scores and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were significantly differences between the two groups. The efficacy in the CT-guided local chemotherapy (Group B) was better than the traditional conservative treatment (Group A). But from the 3 months follow-up to the last follow-up, the VAS scores and ESR was no significant differences between the two groups and the average ESR decreased to normal. There was no evident kyphosis, symptoms or neurological deficits at the final follow-up. The paravertebral abscesses had disappeared, with no significant progression of local kyphosis, significant absorption and clear lesion edges, pain relief and normal ESR in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: For mild spinal tuberculosis, traditional conservative treatment can achieve satisfactory results. The strategy combined with CT-guided local chemotherapy treatment is minimally invasive, beneficial for the drainage of paravertebral abscesses and pain relief.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9206356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92063562022-06-19 Comparative efficacy of traditional conservative treatment and CT-guided local chemotherapy for mild spinal tuberculosis Guo, Yangyang Xu, Meitao Li, Lei Gu, Bin Zhang, Zehua Diao, Wenbo BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: There are considerable differences in the treatment strategy for spinal tuberculosis, including conservative or surgical procedures. Conservative treatment is always suitable for most patients. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of traditional conservative treatment with CT-guided local chemotherapy strategy of mild spinal tuberculosis. METHODS: This research retrospectively analysed 120 patients with spinal tuberculosis between January 2005 and January 2016 according to the diagnostic criteria of mild spinal tuberculosis. In total, 89 patients underwent traditional conservative treatment, 31 underwent CT-guided local chemotherapy. Clinical outcome, laboratory indexes, and radiological results were analysed to provide a clinical basis for the choice of mild spinal tuberculosis treatment. RESULTS: All cases achieved a clinical cure with 24 to 50 months followed up. Cobb angle of the two groups spinal tuberculosis segments was 6.25 ± 3.1100B0, 5.69 ± 2.5800B0 before treatment and 12.36 ± 6.3100B0, 14.87 ± 7.2600B0 after treatment, respectively. The VAS scores were significantly decreased post-treatment. At the 1 month follow-up, the VAS scores and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were significantly differences between the two groups. The efficacy in the CT-guided local chemotherapy (Group B) was better than the traditional conservative treatment (Group A). But from the 3 months follow-up to the last follow-up, the VAS scores and ESR was no significant differences between the two groups and the average ESR decreased to normal. There was no evident kyphosis, symptoms or neurological deficits at the final follow-up. The paravertebral abscesses had disappeared, with no significant progression of local kyphosis, significant absorption and clear lesion edges, pain relief and normal ESR in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: For mild spinal tuberculosis, traditional conservative treatment can achieve satisfactory results. The strategy combined with CT-guided local chemotherapy treatment is minimally invasive, beneficial for the drainage of paravertebral abscesses and pain relief. BioMed Central 2022-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9206356/ /pubmed/35717153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05545-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Guo, Yangyang
Xu, Meitao
Li, Lei
Gu, Bin
Zhang, Zehua
Diao, Wenbo
Comparative efficacy of traditional conservative treatment and CT-guided local chemotherapy for mild spinal tuberculosis
title Comparative efficacy of traditional conservative treatment and CT-guided local chemotherapy for mild spinal tuberculosis
title_full Comparative efficacy of traditional conservative treatment and CT-guided local chemotherapy for mild spinal tuberculosis
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of traditional conservative treatment and CT-guided local chemotherapy for mild spinal tuberculosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of traditional conservative treatment and CT-guided local chemotherapy for mild spinal tuberculosis
title_short Comparative efficacy of traditional conservative treatment and CT-guided local chemotherapy for mild spinal tuberculosis
title_sort comparative efficacy of traditional conservative treatment and ct-guided local chemotherapy for mild spinal tuberculosis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35717153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05545-w
work_keys_str_mv AT guoyangyang comparativeefficacyoftraditionalconservativetreatmentandctguidedlocalchemotherapyformildspinaltuberculosis
AT xumeitao comparativeefficacyoftraditionalconservativetreatmentandctguidedlocalchemotherapyformildspinaltuberculosis
AT lilei comparativeefficacyoftraditionalconservativetreatmentandctguidedlocalchemotherapyformildspinaltuberculosis
AT gubin comparativeefficacyoftraditionalconservativetreatmentandctguidedlocalchemotherapyformildspinaltuberculosis
AT zhangzehua comparativeefficacyoftraditionalconservativetreatmentandctguidedlocalchemotherapyformildspinaltuberculosis
AT diaowenbo comparativeefficacyoftraditionalconservativetreatmentandctguidedlocalchemotherapyformildspinaltuberculosis