Cargando…
Subjective control of polystable illusory apparent motion: Is control possible when the stimulus affords countless motion possibilities?
We investigate whether a new polystable illusion, illusory apparent motion (IAM), is susceptible to subjective perceptual control as has been shown in other polystable stimuli (e.g., the Necker cube, apparent motion quartets). Previous research has demonstrated that, although IAM shares some propert...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35708685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.7.5 |
_version_ | 1784729342499094528 |
---|---|
author | Allen, Allison K. Jacobs, Matthew T. Davidenko, Nicolas |
author_facet | Allen, Allison K. Jacobs, Matthew T. Davidenko, Nicolas |
author_sort | Allen, Allison K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We investigate whether a new polystable illusion, illusory apparent motion (IAM), is susceptible to subjective perceptual control as has been shown in other polystable stimuli (e.g., the Necker cube, apparent motion quartets). Previous research has demonstrated that, although IAM shares some properties in common with other polystable stimuli, it also has some unique ones that make it unclear whether it should have similar susceptibility to subjective control. For example, IAM can be perceived in a countless number of directions and motion patterns (e.g., up–down, left–left, contracting–expanding, shear, diagonal). To explore perceptual control of IAM, in experiment 1 (n = 99) we used a motion persistence paradigm where participants are primed with different motion patterns and are instructed to control (change or hold) the initial motion pattern and indicate when the motion pattern changes. Building on experiment 1, experiment 2 (n = 76) brings the method more in line with previous subjective control research, testing whether participants can control their perception of IAM in a context without priming and while dynamically reporting their percepts throughout the trial. Findings from the two experiments demonstrate that participants were able to control their perception of IAM across paradigms. We explore the implications of these findings, strategies reported, and open questions for future research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9206494 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92064942022-06-19 Subjective control of polystable illusory apparent motion: Is control possible when the stimulus affords countless motion possibilities? Allen, Allison K. Jacobs, Matthew T. Davidenko, Nicolas J Vis Article We investigate whether a new polystable illusion, illusory apparent motion (IAM), is susceptible to subjective perceptual control as has been shown in other polystable stimuli (e.g., the Necker cube, apparent motion quartets). Previous research has demonstrated that, although IAM shares some properties in common with other polystable stimuli, it also has some unique ones that make it unclear whether it should have similar susceptibility to subjective control. For example, IAM can be perceived in a countless number of directions and motion patterns (e.g., up–down, left–left, contracting–expanding, shear, diagonal). To explore perceptual control of IAM, in experiment 1 (n = 99) we used a motion persistence paradigm where participants are primed with different motion patterns and are instructed to control (change or hold) the initial motion pattern and indicate when the motion pattern changes. Building on experiment 1, experiment 2 (n = 76) brings the method more in line with previous subjective control research, testing whether participants can control their perception of IAM in a context without priming and while dynamically reporting their percepts throughout the trial. Findings from the two experiments demonstrate that participants were able to control their perception of IAM across paradigms. We explore the implications of these findings, strategies reported, and open questions for future research. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9206494/ /pubmed/35708685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.7.5 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Article Allen, Allison K. Jacobs, Matthew T. Davidenko, Nicolas Subjective control of polystable illusory apparent motion: Is control possible when the stimulus affords countless motion possibilities? |
title | Subjective control of polystable illusory apparent motion: Is control possible when the stimulus affords countless motion possibilities? |
title_full | Subjective control of polystable illusory apparent motion: Is control possible when the stimulus affords countless motion possibilities? |
title_fullStr | Subjective control of polystable illusory apparent motion: Is control possible when the stimulus affords countless motion possibilities? |
title_full_unstemmed | Subjective control of polystable illusory apparent motion: Is control possible when the stimulus affords countless motion possibilities? |
title_short | Subjective control of polystable illusory apparent motion: Is control possible when the stimulus affords countless motion possibilities? |
title_sort | subjective control of polystable illusory apparent motion: is control possible when the stimulus affords countless motion possibilities? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35708685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.7.5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT allenallisonk subjectivecontrolofpolystableillusoryapparentmotioniscontrolpossiblewhenthestimulusaffordscountlessmotionpossibilities AT jacobsmatthewt subjectivecontrolofpolystableillusoryapparentmotioniscontrolpossiblewhenthestimulusaffordscountlessmotionpossibilities AT davidenkonicolas subjectivecontrolofpolystableillusoryapparentmotioniscontrolpossiblewhenthestimulusaffordscountlessmotionpossibilities |