Cargando…

Outcomes and Hand Use of Reaching Attempts: Comparison of Infants at Risk for Developmental Disability and Infants With Typical Development

BACKGROUND: Infants at risk for developmental disabilities often show signs of motor delay. Reaching is a skill that can help us identify atypical motor trajectories in early infancy. Researchers have studied performance after onset of reaching, but none have followed infants at risk from pre-reachi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Remec, Nushka, Zhou, Judy, Shida-Tokeshi, Joanne, Pickering, Trevor A., Vanderbilt, Douglas L., Smith, Beth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35726268
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.712252
_version_ 1784729350028918784
author Remec, Nushka
Zhou, Judy
Shida-Tokeshi, Joanne
Pickering, Trevor A.
Vanderbilt, Douglas L.
Smith, Beth A.
author_facet Remec, Nushka
Zhou, Judy
Shida-Tokeshi, Joanne
Pickering, Trevor A.
Vanderbilt, Douglas L.
Smith, Beth A.
author_sort Remec, Nushka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Infants at risk for developmental disabilities often show signs of motor delay. Reaching is a skill that can help us identify atypical motor trajectories in early infancy. Researchers have studied performance after onset of reaching, but none have followed infants at risk from pre-reaching to skilled reaching. AIMS: We assessed differences in reaching outcomes and hand use as reaching skill emerged in infants at risk for developmental disabilities and with typical development. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We followed infants at risk for developmental disabilities (n = 11) and infants with typical development (n = 21) longitudinally as they developed reaching skill. Infants reached for a toy at midline while sitting in the caregiver’s lap. Video data were coded for reach outcome (miss, touch, partial grasp, and whole-hand grasp) and hand use (right, left, and bilateral). OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Infants at risk had a larger proportion of missed reaches across visits compared to infants with typical development. Infants at risk also showed less variability in hand use when grasping over the study period. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our results provide information to support early differences in reaching performance to inform identification of typical and atypical developmental trajectories. Future studies should assess how the missed reaches are different and consider other quantitative measures of movement variability in infants at risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9206530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92065302022-06-19 Outcomes and Hand Use of Reaching Attempts: Comparison of Infants at Risk for Developmental Disability and Infants With Typical Development Remec, Nushka Zhou, Judy Shida-Tokeshi, Joanne Pickering, Trevor A. Vanderbilt, Douglas L. Smith, Beth A. Front Psychol Psychology BACKGROUND: Infants at risk for developmental disabilities often show signs of motor delay. Reaching is a skill that can help us identify atypical motor trajectories in early infancy. Researchers have studied performance after onset of reaching, but none have followed infants at risk from pre-reaching to skilled reaching. AIMS: We assessed differences in reaching outcomes and hand use as reaching skill emerged in infants at risk for developmental disabilities and with typical development. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We followed infants at risk for developmental disabilities (n = 11) and infants with typical development (n = 21) longitudinally as they developed reaching skill. Infants reached for a toy at midline while sitting in the caregiver’s lap. Video data were coded for reach outcome (miss, touch, partial grasp, and whole-hand grasp) and hand use (right, left, and bilateral). OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Infants at risk had a larger proportion of missed reaches across visits compared to infants with typical development. Infants at risk also showed less variability in hand use when grasping over the study period. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our results provide information to support early differences in reaching performance to inform identification of typical and atypical developmental trajectories. Future studies should assess how the missed reaches are different and consider other quantitative measures of movement variability in infants at risk. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9206530/ /pubmed/35726268 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.712252 Text en Copyright © 2022 Remec, Zhou, Shida-Tokeshi, Pickering, Vanderbilt and Smith. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Remec, Nushka
Zhou, Judy
Shida-Tokeshi, Joanne
Pickering, Trevor A.
Vanderbilt, Douglas L.
Smith, Beth A.
Outcomes and Hand Use of Reaching Attempts: Comparison of Infants at Risk for Developmental Disability and Infants With Typical Development
title Outcomes and Hand Use of Reaching Attempts: Comparison of Infants at Risk for Developmental Disability and Infants With Typical Development
title_full Outcomes and Hand Use of Reaching Attempts: Comparison of Infants at Risk for Developmental Disability and Infants With Typical Development
title_fullStr Outcomes and Hand Use of Reaching Attempts: Comparison of Infants at Risk for Developmental Disability and Infants With Typical Development
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes and Hand Use of Reaching Attempts: Comparison of Infants at Risk for Developmental Disability and Infants With Typical Development
title_short Outcomes and Hand Use of Reaching Attempts: Comparison of Infants at Risk for Developmental Disability and Infants With Typical Development
title_sort outcomes and hand use of reaching attempts: comparison of infants at risk for developmental disability and infants with typical development
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35726268
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.712252
work_keys_str_mv AT remecnushka outcomesandhanduseofreachingattemptscomparisonofinfantsatriskfordevelopmentaldisabilityandinfantswithtypicaldevelopment
AT zhoujudy outcomesandhanduseofreachingattemptscomparisonofinfantsatriskfordevelopmentaldisabilityandinfantswithtypicaldevelopment
AT shidatokeshijoanne outcomesandhanduseofreachingattemptscomparisonofinfantsatriskfordevelopmentaldisabilityandinfantswithtypicaldevelopment
AT pickeringtrevora outcomesandhanduseofreachingattemptscomparisonofinfantsatriskfordevelopmentaldisabilityandinfantswithtypicaldevelopment
AT vanderbiltdouglasl outcomesandhanduseofreachingattemptscomparisonofinfantsatriskfordevelopmentaldisabilityandinfantswithtypicaldevelopment
AT smithbetha outcomesandhanduseofreachingattemptscomparisonofinfantsatriskfordevelopmentaldisabilityandinfantswithtypicaldevelopment