Cargando…
Outcomes and Hand Use of Reaching Attempts: Comparison of Infants at Risk for Developmental Disability and Infants With Typical Development
BACKGROUND: Infants at risk for developmental disabilities often show signs of motor delay. Reaching is a skill that can help us identify atypical motor trajectories in early infancy. Researchers have studied performance after onset of reaching, but none have followed infants at risk from pre-reachi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35726268 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.712252 |
_version_ | 1784729350028918784 |
---|---|
author | Remec, Nushka Zhou, Judy Shida-Tokeshi, Joanne Pickering, Trevor A. Vanderbilt, Douglas L. Smith, Beth A. |
author_facet | Remec, Nushka Zhou, Judy Shida-Tokeshi, Joanne Pickering, Trevor A. Vanderbilt, Douglas L. Smith, Beth A. |
author_sort | Remec, Nushka |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Infants at risk for developmental disabilities often show signs of motor delay. Reaching is a skill that can help us identify atypical motor trajectories in early infancy. Researchers have studied performance after onset of reaching, but none have followed infants at risk from pre-reaching to skilled reaching. AIMS: We assessed differences in reaching outcomes and hand use as reaching skill emerged in infants at risk for developmental disabilities and with typical development. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We followed infants at risk for developmental disabilities (n = 11) and infants with typical development (n = 21) longitudinally as they developed reaching skill. Infants reached for a toy at midline while sitting in the caregiver’s lap. Video data were coded for reach outcome (miss, touch, partial grasp, and whole-hand grasp) and hand use (right, left, and bilateral). OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Infants at risk had a larger proportion of missed reaches across visits compared to infants with typical development. Infants at risk also showed less variability in hand use when grasping over the study period. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our results provide information to support early differences in reaching performance to inform identification of typical and atypical developmental trajectories. Future studies should assess how the missed reaches are different and consider other quantitative measures of movement variability in infants at risk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9206530 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92065302022-06-19 Outcomes and Hand Use of Reaching Attempts: Comparison of Infants at Risk for Developmental Disability and Infants With Typical Development Remec, Nushka Zhou, Judy Shida-Tokeshi, Joanne Pickering, Trevor A. Vanderbilt, Douglas L. Smith, Beth A. Front Psychol Psychology BACKGROUND: Infants at risk for developmental disabilities often show signs of motor delay. Reaching is a skill that can help us identify atypical motor trajectories in early infancy. Researchers have studied performance after onset of reaching, but none have followed infants at risk from pre-reaching to skilled reaching. AIMS: We assessed differences in reaching outcomes and hand use as reaching skill emerged in infants at risk for developmental disabilities and with typical development. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We followed infants at risk for developmental disabilities (n = 11) and infants with typical development (n = 21) longitudinally as they developed reaching skill. Infants reached for a toy at midline while sitting in the caregiver’s lap. Video data were coded for reach outcome (miss, touch, partial grasp, and whole-hand grasp) and hand use (right, left, and bilateral). OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Infants at risk had a larger proportion of missed reaches across visits compared to infants with typical development. Infants at risk also showed less variability in hand use when grasping over the study period. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our results provide information to support early differences in reaching performance to inform identification of typical and atypical developmental trajectories. Future studies should assess how the missed reaches are different and consider other quantitative measures of movement variability in infants at risk. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9206530/ /pubmed/35726268 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.712252 Text en Copyright © 2022 Remec, Zhou, Shida-Tokeshi, Pickering, Vanderbilt and Smith. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Remec, Nushka Zhou, Judy Shida-Tokeshi, Joanne Pickering, Trevor A. Vanderbilt, Douglas L. Smith, Beth A. Outcomes and Hand Use of Reaching Attempts: Comparison of Infants at Risk for Developmental Disability and Infants With Typical Development |
title | Outcomes and Hand Use of Reaching Attempts: Comparison of Infants at Risk for Developmental Disability and Infants With Typical Development |
title_full | Outcomes and Hand Use of Reaching Attempts: Comparison of Infants at Risk for Developmental Disability and Infants With Typical Development |
title_fullStr | Outcomes and Hand Use of Reaching Attempts: Comparison of Infants at Risk for Developmental Disability and Infants With Typical Development |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes and Hand Use of Reaching Attempts: Comparison of Infants at Risk for Developmental Disability and Infants With Typical Development |
title_short | Outcomes and Hand Use of Reaching Attempts: Comparison of Infants at Risk for Developmental Disability and Infants With Typical Development |
title_sort | outcomes and hand use of reaching attempts: comparison of infants at risk for developmental disability and infants with typical development |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35726268 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.712252 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT remecnushka outcomesandhanduseofreachingattemptscomparisonofinfantsatriskfordevelopmentaldisabilityandinfantswithtypicaldevelopment AT zhoujudy outcomesandhanduseofreachingattemptscomparisonofinfantsatriskfordevelopmentaldisabilityandinfantswithtypicaldevelopment AT shidatokeshijoanne outcomesandhanduseofreachingattemptscomparisonofinfantsatriskfordevelopmentaldisabilityandinfantswithtypicaldevelopment AT pickeringtrevora outcomesandhanduseofreachingattemptscomparisonofinfantsatriskfordevelopmentaldisabilityandinfantswithtypicaldevelopment AT vanderbiltdouglasl outcomesandhanduseofreachingattemptscomparisonofinfantsatriskfordevelopmentaldisabilityandinfantswithtypicaldevelopment AT smithbetha outcomesandhanduseofreachingattemptscomparisonofinfantsatriskfordevelopmentaldisabilityandinfantswithtypicaldevelopment |