Cargando…

Development and validation of motivators for medical specialist career choice questionnaire (MMSCCQ) - a methodological study

INTRODUCTION: A validated instrument to assess the motivating factors influencing junior doctors’ medical specialist career choices is not available. The Motivators for Medical Specialist Career Choice Questionnaire (MMSCCQ) was developed and validated in the present study. METHODS: An exploratory s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nadarajah, Anuradha, Ramasamy, Shamala, Shankar, Pathiyil Ravi, Sreeramareddy, Chandrashekhar T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35718765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03523-3
_version_ 1784729414007783424
author Nadarajah, Anuradha
Ramasamy, Shamala
Shankar, Pathiyil Ravi
Sreeramareddy, Chandrashekhar T.
author_facet Nadarajah, Anuradha
Ramasamy, Shamala
Shankar, Pathiyil Ravi
Sreeramareddy, Chandrashekhar T.
author_sort Nadarajah, Anuradha
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A validated instrument to assess the motivating factors influencing junior doctors’ medical specialist career choices is not available. The Motivators for Medical Specialist Career Choice Questionnaire (MMSCCQ) was developed and validated in the present study. METHODS: An exploratory sequential mixed-methods study was conducted among house officers (HO) of a tertiary care hospital. A literature review was used to construct an interview guide. Seven HOs participated in an online, one-on-one audio-recorded in-depth interview (IDI). Seven sub-themes and 33 codes identified by thematic analyses were used to develop the MMSCCQ. The importance of each motivator was rated on a five-point Likert scale. The MMSCCQ was pretested, and a random sample of 262 house officers was invited to participate in an online survey. Psychometric evaluation was done using reliability statistics, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. RESULTS: The seven main themes identified by thematic analyses were labeled as factors related to ‘work schedule and personal life,’ ‘training opportunities’, ‘past work experiences’, ‘specialty characteristics’, ‘career prospects’, ‘patient care characteristics’, and ‘social factors.’ The highest ratings were given to “previous job experience” and “patient care traits. “The response rate was 71%, the mean age of the 185 HOs was 26.7 years (SD = 1.6). Females made up 63.8% of the population. The internal consistency for the overall questionnaire measured by Cronbach’s alpha was 0.85. Each construct demonstrated an acceptable internal consistency. Twenty-six of 33 items were maintained after an exploratory factor analysis was conducted, yielding 7 constructs with a 64.9% variance. Confirmatory factor analyses established the construct validity. CONCLUSION: The MMSCCQ has acceptable reliability and construct validity. Further studies are needed to test psychometric properties in different settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03523-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9206890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92068902022-06-21 Development and validation of motivators for medical specialist career choice questionnaire (MMSCCQ) - a methodological study Nadarajah, Anuradha Ramasamy, Shamala Shankar, Pathiyil Ravi Sreeramareddy, Chandrashekhar T. BMC Med Educ Research INTRODUCTION: A validated instrument to assess the motivating factors influencing junior doctors’ medical specialist career choices is not available. The Motivators for Medical Specialist Career Choice Questionnaire (MMSCCQ) was developed and validated in the present study. METHODS: An exploratory sequential mixed-methods study was conducted among house officers (HO) of a tertiary care hospital. A literature review was used to construct an interview guide. Seven HOs participated in an online, one-on-one audio-recorded in-depth interview (IDI). Seven sub-themes and 33 codes identified by thematic analyses were used to develop the MMSCCQ. The importance of each motivator was rated on a five-point Likert scale. The MMSCCQ was pretested, and a random sample of 262 house officers was invited to participate in an online survey. Psychometric evaluation was done using reliability statistics, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. RESULTS: The seven main themes identified by thematic analyses were labeled as factors related to ‘work schedule and personal life,’ ‘training opportunities’, ‘past work experiences’, ‘specialty characteristics’, ‘career prospects’, ‘patient care characteristics’, and ‘social factors.’ The highest ratings were given to “previous job experience” and “patient care traits. “The response rate was 71%, the mean age of the 185 HOs was 26.7 years (SD = 1.6). Females made up 63.8% of the population. The internal consistency for the overall questionnaire measured by Cronbach’s alpha was 0.85. Each construct demonstrated an acceptable internal consistency. Twenty-six of 33 items were maintained after an exploratory factor analysis was conducted, yielding 7 constructs with a 64.9% variance. Confirmatory factor analyses established the construct validity. CONCLUSION: The MMSCCQ has acceptable reliability and construct validity. Further studies are needed to test psychometric properties in different settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03523-3. BioMed Central 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9206890/ /pubmed/35718765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03523-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Nadarajah, Anuradha
Ramasamy, Shamala
Shankar, Pathiyil Ravi
Sreeramareddy, Chandrashekhar T.
Development and validation of motivators for medical specialist career choice questionnaire (MMSCCQ) - a methodological study
title Development and validation of motivators for medical specialist career choice questionnaire (MMSCCQ) - a methodological study
title_full Development and validation of motivators for medical specialist career choice questionnaire (MMSCCQ) - a methodological study
title_fullStr Development and validation of motivators for medical specialist career choice questionnaire (MMSCCQ) - a methodological study
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of motivators for medical specialist career choice questionnaire (MMSCCQ) - a methodological study
title_short Development and validation of motivators for medical specialist career choice questionnaire (MMSCCQ) - a methodological study
title_sort development and validation of motivators for medical specialist career choice questionnaire (mmsccq) - a methodological study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35718765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03523-3
work_keys_str_mv AT nadarajahanuradha developmentandvalidationofmotivatorsformedicalspecialistcareerchoicequestionnairemmsccqamethodologicalstudy
AT ramasamyshamala developmentandvalidationofmotivatorsformedicalspecialistcareerchoicequestionnairemmsccqamethodologicalstudy
AT shankarpathiyilravi developmentandvalidationofmotivatorsformedicalspecialistcareerchoicequestionnairemmsccqamethodologicalstudy
AT sreeramareddychandrashekhart developmentandvalidationofmotivatorsformedicalspecialistcareerchoicequestionnairemmsccqamethodologicalstudy