Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide 1 mg versus Canagliflozin 300 mg in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a Canadian Setting

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg versus once-daily canagliflozin 300 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) uncontrolled with metformin from the healthcare payer and societal perspectives in Canada. METHODS: Head-t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stafford, Sara, Bech, Peter G., Fridhammar, Adam, Miresashvili, Nino, Nilsson, Andreas, Willis, Michael, Liu, Aiden
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35344191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-022-00726-z
_version_ 1784729419147902976
author Stafford, Sara
Bech, Peter G.
Fridhammar, Adam
Miresashvili, Nino
Nilsson, Andreas
Willis, Michael
Liu, Aiden
author_facet Stafford, Sara
Bech, Peter G.
Fridhammar, Adam
Miresashvili, Nino
Nilsson, Andreas
Willis, Michael
Liu, Aiden
author_sort Stafford, Sara
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg versus once-daily canagliflozin 300 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) uncontrolled with metformin from the healthcare payer and societal perspectives in Canada. METHODS: Head-to-head data from the SUSTAIN 8 randomised trial (NCT03136484) were extrapolated over 40 years using economic simulation modelling. The cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg versus canagliflozin 300 mg for treating T2DM was estimated using the Swedish Institute for Health Economics-Diabetes Cohort Model (IHE-DCM) and the Economic and Health Outcomes Model of T2DM (ECHO-T2DM). Unit costs and disutility weights capturing treatments and key macro- and microvascular complications were sourced from the literature to best match the Canadian setting. A probabilistic base-case simulation and sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg was associated with reductions in macro- and microvascular complications, yielding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of (Canadian dollars [CAD]) CAD16,392 and 18,098 per incremental quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained versus canagliflozin 300 mg for IHE-DCM and ECHO-T2DM, respectively, from a healthcare payer perspective. Accounting for productivity loss as well, ICERs were CAD14,127 and 13,188 per QALY gained for IHE-DCM and ECHO-T2DM, respectively, from a societal perspective. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that the base-case results were robust to changes in input parameters and assumptions used. CONCLUSIONS: At a willingness-to-pay threshold of CAD50,000 per QALY gained, once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg was cost-effective over 40 years versus once-daily canagliflozin 300 mg for the treatment of T2DM in patients failing to maintain glycemic control with metformin alone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40258-022-00726-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9206917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92069172022-06-21 Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide 1 mg versus Canagliflozin 300 mg in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a Canadian Setting Stafford, Sara Bech, Peter G. Fridhammar, Adam Miresashvili, Nino Nilsson, Andreas Willis, Michael Liu, Aiden Appl Health Econ Health Policy Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg versus once-daily canagliflozin 300 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) uncontrolled with metformin from the healthcare payer and societal perspectives in Canada. METHODS: Head-to-head data from the SUSTAIN 8 randomised trial (NCT03136484) were extrapolated over 40 years using economic simulation modelling. The cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg versus canagliflozin 300 mg for treating T2DM was estimated using the Swedish Institute for Health Economics-Diabetes Cohort Model (IHE-DCM) and the Economic and Health Outcomes Model of T2DM (ECHO-T2DM). Unit costs and disutility weights capturing treatments and key macro- and microvascular complications were sourced from the literature to best match the Canadian setting. A probabilistic base-case simulation and sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg was associated with reductions in macro- and microvascular complications, yielding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of (Canadian dollars [CAD]) CAD16,392 and 18,098 per incremental quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained versus canagliflozin 300 mg for IHE-DCM and ECHO-T2DM, respectively, from a healthcare payer perspective. Accounting for productivity loss as well, ICERs were CAD14,127 and 13,188 per QALY gained for IHE-DCM and ECHO-T2DM, respectively, from a societal perspective. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that the base-case results were robust to changes in input parameters and assumptions used. CONCLUSIONS: At a willingness-to-pay threshold of CAD50,000 per QALY gained, once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg was cost-effective over 40 years versus once-daily canagliflozin 300 mg for the treatment of T2DM in patients failing to maintain glycemic control with metformin alone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40258-022-00726-z. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-28 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9206917/ /pubmed/35344191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-022-00726-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Stafford, Sara
Bech, Peter G.
Fridhammar, Adam
Miresashvili, Nino
Nilsson, Andreas
Willis, Michael
Liu, Aiden
Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide 1 mg versus Canagliflozin 300 mg in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a Canadian Setting
title Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide 1 mg versus Canagliflozin 300 mg in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a Canadian Setting
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide 1 mg versus Canagliflozin 300 mg in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a Canadian Setting
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide 1 mg versus Canagliflozin 300 mg in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a Canadian Setting
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide 1 mg versus Canagliflozin 300 mg in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a Canadian Setting
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide 1 mg versus Canagliflozin 300 mg in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a Canadian Setting
title_sort cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg versus canagliflozin 300 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a canadian setting
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35344191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-022-00726-z
work_keys_str_mv AT staffordsara costeffectivenessofonceweeklysemaglutide1mgversuscanagliflozin300mginpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusinacanadiansetting
AT bechpeterg costeffectivenessofonceweeklysemaglutide1mgversuscanagliflozin300mginpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusinacanadiansetting
AT fridhammaradam costeffectivenessofonceweeklysemaglutide1mgversuscanagliflozin300mginpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusinacanadiansetting
AT miresashvilinino costeffectivenessofonceweeklysemaglutide1mgversuscanagliflozin300mginpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusinacanadiansetting
AT nilssonandreas costeffectivenessofonceweeklysemaglutide1mgversuscanagliflozin300mginpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusinacanadiansetting
AT willismichael costeffectivenessofonceweeklysemaglutide1mgversuscanagliflozin300mginpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusinacanadiansetting
AT liuaiden costeffectivenessofonceweeklysemaglutide1mgversuscanagliflozin300mginpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusinacanadiansetting