Cargando…

Biologic Initiation Rate in Systemic-Naïve Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Starting Treatment with Apremilast vs Methotrexate: 1-Year Retrospective Analysis of a US Claims Database

PURPOSE: To compare the rate of biologic initiation after commencing treatment with apremilast (APR) vs methotrexate (MTX), in systemic-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Systemic-naïve patients with PsA who started treatment with either APR or MTX between 01/01/201...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Husni, M Elaine, Chang, Eunice, Broder, Michael S, Paydar, Caleb, Bognar, Katalin, Desai, Pooja, Klyachkin, Yuri, Khilfeh, Ibrahim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9207121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35734243
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S342123
_version_ 1784729448190312448
author Husni, M Elaine
Chang, Eunice
Broder, Michael S
Paydar, Caleb
Bognar, Katalin
Desai, Pooja
Klyachkin, Yuri
Khilfeh, Ibrahim
author_facet Husni, M Elaine
Chang, Eunice
Broder, Michael S
Paydar, Caleb
Bognar, Katalin
Desai, Pooja
Klyachkin, Yuri
Khilfeh, Ibrahim
author_sort Husni, M Elaine
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the rate of biologic initiation after commencing treatment with apremilast (APR) vs methotrexate (MTX), in systemic-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Systemic-naïve patients with PsA who started treatment with either APR or MTX between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2018 were analyzed using claims data from the IBM(®) MarketScan(®) Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases (2014–2019). PsA patients were identified via diagnosis codes; the first prescription date for APR or MTX was the index date. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, healthcare utilization during the year pre-index (baseline) and the year post-index (follow-up), and median time to biologic initiation were reported descriptively. The rates and risk of biologic initiation during follow-up were compared between APR and MTX users by logistic and Cox regressions, respectively. Models were adjusted for demographics, clinical and utilization measures during the baseline period. RESULTS: A total of 2116 patients with PsA newly treated with APR (n = 534) or MTX (n = 1582) were identified. Mean age was similar (50.5 vs 50.4; P = 0.938), and proportion of females was higher for APR vs MTX users (59.4% vs 54.0%; P = 0.031). Mean time to biologic initiation among patients who initiated during follow-up was 194.1 vs 138.7 days between APR vs MTX users (P < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, the likelihood of biologic initiation was 58% lower (OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.32–0.54]; P < 0.001) with APR, with a significantly lower predicted rate of biologic initiation among APR users when compared to MTX users during follow-up (20.0% [95% CI, 16.6–23.9%] vs 37.5% [95% CI, 35.0–40.1%]). Additionally, APR users had a lower risk of biologic initiation than MTX users (HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.37–0.57]; P < 0.001) during the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Systemic-naïve patients with PsA have a lower rate of, and longer time to, biologic initiation over one-year following APR initiation, compared to those initiating MTX.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9207121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92071212022-06-21 Biologic Initiation Rate in Systemic-Naïve Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Starting Treatment with Apremilast vs Methotrexate: 1-Year Retrospective Analysis of a US Claims Database Husni, M Elaine Chang, Eunice Broder, Michael S Paydar, Caleb Bognar, Katalin Desai, Pooja Klyachkin, Yuri Khilfeh, Ibrahim Open Access Rheumatol Original Research PURPOSE: To compare the rate of biologic initiation after commencing treatment with apremilast (APR) vs methotrexate (MTX), in systemic-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Systemic-naïve patients with PsA who started treatment with either APR or MTX between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2018 were analyzed using claims data from the IBM(®) MarketScan(®) Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases (2014–2019). PsA patients were identified via diagnosis codes; the first prescription date for APR or MTX was the index date. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, healthcare utilization during the year pre-index (baseline) and the year post-index (follow-up), and median time to biologic initiation were reported descriptively. The rates and risk of biologic initiation during follow-up were compared between APR and MTX users by logistic and Cox regressions, respectively. Models were adjusted for demographics, clinical and utilization measures during the baseline period. RESULTS: A total of 2116 patients with PsA newly treated with APR (n = 534) or MTX (n = 1582) were identified. Mean age was similar (50.5 vs 50.4; P = 0.938), and proportion of females was higher for APR vs MTX users (59.4% vs 54.0%; P = 0.031). Mean time to biologic initiation among patients who initiated during follow-up was 194.1 vs 138.7 days between APR vs MTX users (P < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, the likelihood of biologic initiation was 58% lower (OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.32–0.54]; P < 0.001) with APR, with a significantly lower predicted rate of biologic initiation among APR users when compared to MTX users during follow-up (20.0% [95% CI, 16.6–23.9%] vs 37.5% [95% CI, 35.0–40.1%]). Additionally, APR users had a lower risk of biologic initiation than MTX users (HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.37–0.57]; P < 0.001) during the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Systemic-naïve patients with PsA have a lower rate of, and longer time to, biologic initiation over one-year following APR initiation, compared to those initiating MTX. Dove 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9207121/ /pubmed/35734243 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S342123 Text en © 2022 Husni et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Husni, M Elaine
Chang, Eunice
Broder, Michael S
Paydar, Caleb
Bognar, Katalin
Desai, Pooja
Klyachkin, Yuri
Khilfeh, Ibrahim
Biologic Initiation Rate in Systemic-Naïve Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Starting Treatment with Apremilast vs Methotrexate: 1-Year Retrospective Analysis of a US Claims Database
title Biologic Initiation Rate in Systemic-Naïve Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Starting Treatment with Apremilast vs Methotrexate: 1-Year Retrospective Analysis of a US Claims Database
title_full Biologic Initiation Rate in Systemic-Naïve Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Starting Treatment with Apremilast vs Methotrexate: 1-Year Retrospective Analysis of a US Claims Database
title_fullStr Biologic Initiation Rate in Systemic-Naïve Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Starting Treatment with Apremilast vs Methotrexate: 1-Year Retrospective Analysis of a US Claims Database
title_full_unstemmed Biologic Initiation Rate in Systemic-Naïve Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Starting Treatment with Apremilast vs Methotrexate: 1-Year Retrospective Analysis of a US Claims Database
title_short Biologic Initiation Rate in Systemic-Naïve Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Starting Treatment with Apremilast vs Methotrexate: 1-Year Retrospective Analysis of a US Claims Database
title_sort biologic initiation rate in systemic-naïve psoriatic arthritis patients starting treatment with apremilast vs methotrexate: 1-year retrospective analysis of a us claims database
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9207121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35734243
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S342123
work_keys_str_mv AT husnimelaine biologicinitiationrateinsystemicnaivepsoriaticarthritispatientsstartingtreatmentwithapremilastvsmethotrexate1yearretrospectiveanalysisofausclaimsdatabase
AT changeunice biologicinitiationrateinsystemicnaivepsoriaticarthritispatientsstartingtreatmentwithapremilastvsmethotrexate1yearretrospectiveanalysisofausclaimsdatabase
AT brodermichaels biologicinitiationrateinsystemicnaivepsoriaticarthritispatientsstartingtreatmentwithapremilastvsmethotrexate1yearretrospectiveanalysisofausclaimsdatabase
AT paydarcaleb biologicinitiationrateinsystemicnaivepsoriaticarthritispatientsstartingtreatmentwithapremilastvsmethotrexate1yearretrospectiveanalysisofausclaimsdatabase
AT bognarkatalin biologicinitiationrateinsystemicnaivepsoriaticarthritispatientsstartingtreatmentwithapremilastvsmethotrexate1yearretrospectiveanalysisofausclaimsdatabase
AT desaipooja biologicinitiationrateinsystemicnaivepsoriaticarthritispatientsstartingtreatmentwithapremilastvsmethotrexate1yearretrospectiveanalysisofausclaimsdatabase
AT klyachkinyuri biologicinitiationrateinsystemicnaivepsoriaticarthritispatientsstartingtreatmentwithapremilastvsmethotrexate1yearretrospectiveanalysisofausclaimsdatabase
AT khilfehibrahim biologicinitiationrateinsystemicnaivepsoriaticarthritispatientsstartingtreatmentwithapremilastvsmethotrexate1yearretrospectiveanalysisofausclaimsdatabase