Cargando…

Intralesional Marginal Resection for Osteoblastoma in the Mobile Spine: Experience From a Single Center

Osteoblastoma (OB) is a benign bone tumor with aggressive behavior and a tendency for local recurrence. The appropriate surgical strategy for spinal OB remains unclear. This retrospective study aimed to verify the clinical efficacy and safety of intralesional marginal resection of OB in the mobile s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cao, Shiliang, Chen, Keyuan, Jiang, Liang, Wei, Feng, Liu, Xiaoguang, Liu, Zhongjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9207176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35733437
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.838235
_version_ 1784729458497814528
author Cao, Shiliang
Chen, Keyuan
Jiang, Liang
Wei, Feng
Liu, Xiaoguang
Liu, Zhongjun
author_facet Cao, Shiliang
Chen, Keyuan
Jiang, Liang
Wei, Feng
Liu, Xiaoguang
Liu, Zhongjun
author_sort Cao, Shiliang
collection PubMed
description Osteoblastoma (OB) is a benign bone tumor with aggressive behavior and a tendency for local recurrence. The appropriate surgical strategy for spinal OB remains unclear. This retrospective study aimed to verify the clinical efficacy and safety of intralesional marginal resection of OB in the mobile spine. We enrolled 50 consecutive patients with spinal OB between January 2009 and December 2019. The tumors were staged based on the Enneking system, with 21 and 29 lesions being determined as stage 2 (St.2) and stage 3 (St.3), respectively. Among them, 42 patients underwent intralesional marginal resection, five underwent extensive curettage, and three underwent en bloc resection successfully since their lesions were limited to the posterior element in a single vertebra. We analyzed clinical characteristics, perioperative and follow-up images, surgical details, and follow-up data. Within a median follow-up duration of 50 (range: 24–160) months, six (12.0%) patients had local recurrence. The recurrence rates among patients who underwent intralesional marginal resection, curettage, en bloc resection were 7.1%(3/42), 60.0%(3/5), and 0%(0/3), respectively. The recurrence rate of intralesional marginal resection of St.3 lesions was slightly higher than that of St.2 lesions (7.7%[2/26] vs. 6.3%[1/16]). There were 16(38.1%), 3(60.0%), and 0 patients with surgical complications among those who underwent intralesional marginal resection, curettage, and en bloc resection, respectively. Local recurrence was observed in five (5/14, 35.7%) patients who had vertebral artery extension and in none who did not have vertebral artery extension (p = 0.02). Our findings suggest that intralesional marginal resection could be an appropriate treatment choice for patients with spinal OB, both St.2 and St.3 lesions, with an acceptable local recurrence rate and a low risk of complications. Vertebral artery extension could be a strong risk factor for local recurrence in patients with spinal OB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9207176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92071762022-06-21 Intralesional Marginal Resection for Osteoblastoma in the Mobile Spine: Experience From a Single Center Cao, Shiliang Chen, Keyuan Jiang, Liang Wei, Feng Liu, Xiaoguang Liu, Zhongjun Front Surg Surgery Osteoblastoma (OB) is a benign bone tumor with aggressive behavior and a tendency for local recurrence. The appropriate surgical strategy for spinal OB remains unclear. This retrospective study aimed to verify the clinical efficacy and safety of intralesional marginal resection of OB in the mobile spine. We enrolled 50 consecutive patients with spinal OB between January 2009 and December 2019. The tumors were staged based on the Enneking system, with 21 and 29 lesions being determined as stage 2 (St.2) and stage 3 (St.3), respectively. Among them, 42 patients underwent intralesional marginal resection, five underwent extensive curettage, and three underwent en bloc resection successfully since their lesions were limited to the posterior element in a single vertebra. We analyzed clinical characteristics, perioperative and follow-up images, surgical details, and follow-up data. Within a median follow-up duration of 50 (range: 24–160) months, six (12.0%) patients had local recurrence. The recurrence rates among patients who underwent intralesional marginal resection, curettage, en bloc resection were 7.1%(3/42), 60.0%(3/5), and 0%(0/3), respectively. The recurrence rate of intralesional marginal resection of St.3 lesions was slightly higher than that of St.2 lesions (7.7%[2/26] vs. 6.3%[1/16]). There were 16(38.1%), 3(60.0%), and 0 patients with surgical complications among those who underwent intralesional marginal resection, curettage, and en bloc resection, respectively. Local recurrence was observed in five (5/14, 35.7%) patients who had vertebral artery extension and in none who did not have vertebral artery extension (p = 0.02). Our findings suggest that intralesional marginal resection could be an appropriate treatment choice for patients with spinal OB, both St.2 and St.3 lesions, with an acceptable local recurrence rate and a low risk of complications. Vertebral artery extension could be a strong risk factor for local recurrence in patients with spinal OB. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9207176/ /pubmed/35733437 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.838235 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cao, Chen, Jiang, Wei, Liu and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Cao, Shiliang
Chen, Keyuan
Jiang, Liang
Wei, Feng
Liu, Xiaoguang
Liu, Zhongjun
Intralesional Marginal Resection for Osteoblastoma in the Mobile Spine: Experience From a Single Center
title Intralesional Marginal Resection for Osteoblastoma in the Mobile Spine: Experience From a Single Center
title_full Intralesional Marginal Resection for Osteoblastoma in the Mobile Spine: Experience From a Single Center
title_fullStr Intralesional Marginal Resection for Osteoblastoma in the Mobile Spine: Experience From a Single Center
title_full_unstemmed Intralesional Marginal Resection for Osteoblastoma in the Mobile Spine: Experience From a Single Center
title_short Intralesional Marginal Resection for Osteoblastoma in the Mobile Spine: Experience From a Single Center
title_sort intralesional marginal resection for osteoblastoma in the mobile spine: experience from a single center
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9207176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35733437
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.838235
work_keys_str_mv AT caoshiliang intralesionalmarginalresectionforosteoblastomainthemobilespineexperiencefromasinglecenter
AT chenkeyuan intralesionalmarginalresectionforosteoblastomainthemobilespineexperiencefromasinglecenter
AT jiangliang intralesionalmarginalresectionforosteoblastomainthemobilespineexperiencefromasinglecenter
AT weifeng intralesionalmarginalresectionforosteoblastomainthemobilespineexperiencefromasinglecenter
AT liuxiaoguang intralesionalmarginalresectionforosteoblastomainthemobilespineexperiencefromasinglecenter
AT liuzhongjun intralesionalmarginalresectionforosteoblastomainthemobilespineexperiencefromasinglecenter