Cargando…

When might host heterogeneity drive the evolution of asymptomatic, pandemic coronaviruses?

Controlling many infectious diseases, including SARS-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), requires surveillance followed by isolation, contact-tracing and quarantining. These interventions often begin by identifying symptomatic individuals. However, actively removing pathogen strains causing symptomatic infe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okamoto, Kenichi W., Ong, Virakbott, Wallace, Robert, Wallace, Rodrick, Chaves, Luis Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9207439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35757097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07548-7
_version_ 1784729531668496384
author Okamoto, Kenichi W.
Ong, Virakbott
Wallace, Robert
Wallace, Rodrick
Chaves, Luis Fernando
author_facet Okamoto, Kenichi W.
Ong, Virakbott
Wallace, Robert
Wallace, Rodrick
Chaves, Luis Fernando
author_sort Okamoto, Kenichi W.
collection PubMed
description Controlling many infectious diseases, including SARS-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), requires surveillance followed by isolation, contact-tracing and quarantining. These interventions often begin by identifying symptomatic individuals. However, actively removing pathogen strains causing symptomatic infections may inadvertently select for strains less likely to cause symptomatic infections. Moreover, a pathogen’s fitness landscape is structured around a heterogeneous host pool; uneven surveillance efforts and distinct transmission risks across host classes can meaningfully alter selection pressures. Here, we explore this interplay between evolution caused by disease control efforts and the evolutionary consequences of host heterogeneity. Using an evolutionary epidemiology model parameterized for coronaviruses, we show that intense symptoms-driven disease control selects for asymptomatic strains, particularly when these efforts are applied unevenly across host groups. Under these conditions, increasing quarantine efforts have diverging effects. If isolation alone cannot eradicate, intensive quarantine efforts combined with uneven detections of asymptomatic infections (e.g., via neglect of some host classes) can favor the evolution of asymptomatic strains. We further show how, when intervention intensity depends on the prevalence of symptomatic infections, higher removal efforts (and isolating symptomatic cases in particular) more readily select for asymptomatic strains than when these efforts do not depend on prevalence. The selection pressures on pathogens caused by isolation and quarantining likely lie between the extremes of no intervention and thoroughly successful eradication. Thus, analyzing how different public health responses can select for asymptomatic pathogen strains is critical for identifying disease suppression efforts that can effectively manage emerging infectious diseases. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11071-022-07548-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9207439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92074392022-06-21 When might host heterogeneity drive the evolution of asymptomatic, pandemic coronaviruses? Okamoto, Kenichi W. Ong, Virakbott Wallace, Robert Wallace, Rodrick Chaves, Luis Fernando Nonlinear Dyn Original Paper Controlling many infectious diseases, including SARS-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), requires surveillance followed by isolation, contact-tracing and quarantining. These interventions often begin by identifying symptomatic individuals. However, actively removing pathogen strains causing symptomatic infections may inadvertently select for strains less likely to cause symptomatic infections. Moreover, a pathogen’s fitness landscape is structured around a heterogeneous host pool; uneven surveillance efforts and distinct transmission risks across host classes can meaningfully alter selection pressures. Here, we explore this interplay between evolution caused by disease control efforts and the evolutionary consequences of host heterogeneity. Using an evolutionary epidemiology model parameterized for coronaviruses, we show that intense symptoms-driven disease control selects for asymptomatic strains, particularly when these efforts are applied unevenly across host groups. Under these conditions, increasing quarantine efforts have diverging effects. If isolation alone cannot eradicate, intensive quarantine efforts combined with uneven detections of asymptomatic infections (e.g., via neglect of some host classes) can favor the evolution of asymptomatic strains. We further show how, when intervention intensity depends on the prevalence of symptomatic infections, higher removal efforts (and isolating symptomatic cases in particular) more readily select for asymptomatic strains than when these efforts do not depend on prevalence. The selection pressures on pathogens caused by isolation and quarantining likely lie between the extremes of no intervention and thoroughly successful eradication. Thus, analyzing how different public health responses can select for asymptomatic pathogen strains is critical for identifying disease suppression efforts that can effectively manage emerging infectious diseases. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11071-022-07548-7. Springer Netherlands 2022-06-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9207439/ /pubmed/35757097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07548-7 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Okamoto, Kenichi W.
Ong, Virakbott
Wallace, Robert
Wallace, Rodrick
Chaves, Luis Fernando
When might host heterogeneity drive the evolution of asymptomatic, pandemic coronaviruses?
title When might host heterogeneity drive the evolution of asymptomatic, pandemic coronaviruses?
title_full When might host heterogeneity drive the evolution of asymptomatic, pandemic coronaviruses?
title_fullStr When might host heterogeneity drive the evolution of asymptomatic, pandemic coronaviruses?
title_full_unstemmed When might host heterogeneity drive the evolution of asymptomatic, pandemic coronaviruses?
title_short When might host heterogeneity drive the evolution of asymptomatic, pandemic coronaviruses?
title_sort when might host heterogeneity drive the evolution of asymptomatic, pandemic coronaviruses?
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9207439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35757097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07548-7
work_keys_str_mv AT okamotokenichiw whenmighthostheterogeneitydrivetheevolutionofasymptomaticpandemiccoronaviruses
AT ongvirakbott whenmighthostheterogeneitydrivetheevolutionofasymptomaticpandemiccoronaviruses
AT wallacerobert whenmighthostheterogeneitydrivetheevolutionofasymptomaticpandemiccoronaviruses
AT wallacerodrick whenmighthostheterogeneitydrivetheevolutionofasymptomaticpandemiccoronaviruses
AT chavesluisfernando whenmighthostheterogeneitydrivetheevolutionofasymptomaticpandemiccoronaviruses