Cargando…

Signal and measurement considerations for human translation of diffuse in vivo flow cytometry

SIGNIFICANCE: “Diffuse in vivo flow cytometry” (DiFC) is an emerging technology for fluorescence detection of rare circulating cells directly in large deep-seated blood vessels in mice. Because DiFC uses highly scattered light, in principle, it could be translated to human use. However, an open ques...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ivich, Fernando, Pace, Joshua, Williams, Amber L., Shumel, Malcolm, Fang, Qianqian, Niedre, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9207655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35726129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.27.6.067001
_version_ 1784729579863146496
author Ivich, Fernando
Pace, Joshua
Williams, Amber L.
Shumel, Malcolm
Fang, Qianqian
Niedre, Mark
author_facet Ivich, Fernando
Pace, Joshua
Williams, Amber L.
Shumel, Malcolm
Fang, Qianqian
Niedre, Mark
author_sort Ivich, Fernando
collection PubMed
description SIGNIFICANCE: “Diffuse in vivo flow cytometry” (DiFC) is an emerging technology for fluorescence detection of rare circulating cells directly in large deep-seated blood vessels in mice. Because DiFC uses highly scattered light, in principle, it could be translated to human use. However, an open question is whether fluorescent signals from single cells would be detectable in human-scale anatomies. AIM: Suitable blood vessels in a human wrist or forearm are at a depth of [Formula: see text] to 4 mm. The aim of this work was to study the impact of DiFC instrument geometry and wavelength on the detected DiFC signal and on the maximum depth of detection of a moving cell. APPROACH: We used Monte Carlo simulations to compute fluorescence Jacobian (sensitivity) matrices for a range of source and detector separations (SDS) and tissue optical properties over the visible and near infrared spectrum. We performed experimental measurements with three available versions of DiFC (488, 640, and 780 nm), fluorescent microspheres, and tissue mimicking optical flow phantoms. We used both computational and experimental data to estimate the maximum depth of detection at each combination of settings. RESULTS: For the DiFC detection problem, our analysis showed that for deep-seated blood vessels, the maximum sensitivity was obtained with NIR light (780 nm) and 3-mm SDS. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that—in combination with a suitable molecularly targeted fluorescent probes—circulating cells and nanosensors could, in principle, be detectable in circulation in humans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9207655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92076552022-06-21 Signal and measurement considerations for human translation of diffuse in vivo flow cytometry Ivich, Fernando Pace, Joshua Williams, Amber L. Shumel, Malcolm Fang, Qianqian Niedre, Mark J Biomed Opt Sensing SIGNIFICANCE: “Diffuse in vivo flow cytometry” (DiFC) is an emerging technology for fluorescence detection of rare circulating cells directly in large deep-seated blood vessels in mice. Because DiFC uses highly scattered light, in principle, it could be translated to human use. However, an open question is whether fluorescent signals from single cells would be detectable in human-scale anatomies. AIM: Suitable blood vessels in a human wrist or forearm are at a depth of [Formula: see text] to 4 mm. The aim of this work was to study the impact of DiFC instrument geometry and wavelength on the detected DiFC signal and on the maximum depth of detection of a moving cell. APPROACH: We used Monte Carlo simulations to compute fluorescence Jacobian (sensitivity) matrices for a range of source and detector separations (SDS) and tissue optical properties over the visible and near infrared spectrum. We performed experimental measurements with three available versions of DiFC (488, 640, and 780 nm), fluorescent microspheres, and tissue mimicking optical flow phantoms. We used both computational and experimental data to estimate the maximum depth of detection at each combination of settings. RESULTS: For the DiFC detection problem, our analysis showed that for deep-seated blood vessels, the maximum sensitivity was obtained with NIR light (780 nm) and 3-mm SDS. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that—in combination with a suitable molecularly targeted fluorescent probes—circulating cells and nanosensors could, in principle, be detectable in circulation in humans. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2022-06-20 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9207655/ /pubmed/35726129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.27.6.067001 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
spellingShingle Sensing
Ivich, Fernando
Pace, Joshua
Williams, Amber L.
Shumel, Malcolm
Fang, Qianqian
Niedre, Mark
Signal and measurement considerations for human translation of diffuse in vivo flow cytometry
title Signal and measurement considerations for human translation of diffuse in vivo flow cytometry
title_full Signal and measurement considerations for human translation of diffuse in vivo flow cytometry
title_fullStr Signal and measurement considerations for human translation of diffuse in vivo flow cytometry
title_full_unstemmed Signal and measurement considerations for human translation of diffuse in vivo flow cytometry
title_short Signal and measurement considerations for human translation of diffuse in vivo flow cytometry
title_sort signal and measurement considerations for human translation of diffuse in vivo flow cytometry
topic Sensing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9207655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35726129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.27.6.067001
work_keys_str_mv AT ivichfernando signalandmeasurementconsiderationsforhumantranslationofdiffuseinvivoflowcytometry
AT pacejoshua signalandmeasurementconsiderationsforhumantranslationofdiffuseinvivoflowcytometry
AT williamsamberl signalandmeasurementconsiderationsforhumantranslationofdiffuseinvivoflowcytometry
AT shumelmalcolm signalandmeasurementconsiderationsforhumantranslationofdiffuseinvivoflowcytometry
AT fangqianqian signalandmeasurementconsiderationsforhumantranslationofdiffuseinvivoflowcytometry
AT niedremark signalandmeasurementconsiderationsforhumantranslationofdiffuseinvivoflowcytometry