Cargando…

Tailored exercise and manual therapy versus standardised exercise for patients with shoulder subacromial pain: a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the Otago MASTER trial)

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether it was feasible to conduct a full trial comparing a tailored versus a standardised exercise programme for patients with shoulder subacromial pain. DESIGN: Two-arm, patient-blinded and assessor-blinded, randomised controlled feasibility trial. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ribeiro, Daniel C, Jafarian Tangrood, Zohreh, Wilson, Ross, Sole, Gisela, Abbott, J Haxby
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9207741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35710235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053572
_version_ 1784729594373341184
author Ribeiro, Daniel C
Jafarian Tangrood, Zohreh
Wilson, Ross
Sole, Gisela
Abbott, J Haxby
author_facet Ribeiro, Daniel C
Jafarian Tangrood, Zohreh
Wilson, Ross
Sole, Gisela
Abbott, J Haxby
author_sort Ribeiro, Daniel C
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether it was feasible to conduct a full trial comparing a tailored versus a standardised exercise programme for patients with shoulder subacromial pain. DESIGN: Two-arm, patient-blinded and assessor-blinded, randomised controlled feasibility trial. METHODS: Twenty-eight participants with shoulder subacromial pain were randomly allocated into one of two intervention groups—tailored or standardised exercise. Participants in the tailored exercise programme received exercises and manual therapy tailored to their scapular and shoulder movement impairments. Participants in the standardised exercise programme received progressive strengthening exercise. The primary outcome measures were (1) the participant recruitment rate; (2) the proportion of participants enrolled from the total number screened; (3) drop-out rates; and (4) adherence to the rehabilitation programme. Other outcome measures were: (5) pain levels; (6) Patient-Specific Functional Scale; (7) the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; and (8) pain self-efficacy. We compared changes in pain and disability scores between groups using a repeated mixed-model analysis of variance. Since this is a feasibility study, we did not adjust alpha for multiple comparisons, and considered 75% CI as the probability threshold at 3-month follow-up. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Short-Form 12 and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated. RESULTS: The recruitment rate was 3 participants per month, the proportion of participants enrolled was 23%, the drop-out rate was 14% and the overall adherence to the rehabilitation programme was 85%. No between-group differences were found for most outcome measures. Adverse events (n=2, only in the tailored group) were minor in nature and included skin injury or pain following taping. CONCLUSIONS: Our feasibility trial showed that additional strategies are required for improving recruitment, enrolment and minimising drop-out of participants into the trial and making it feasible to conduct a full trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTR: 12617001405303.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9207741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92077412022-06-29 Tailored exercise and manual therapy versus standardised exercise for patients with shoulder subacromial pain: a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the Otago MASTER trial) Ribeiro, Daniel C Jafarian Tangrood, Zohreh Wilson, Ross Sole, Gisela Abbott, J Haxby BMJ Open Sports and Exercise Medicine OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether it was feasible to conduct a full trial comparing a tailored versus a standardised exercise programme for patients with shoulder subacromial pain. DESIGN: Two-arm, patient-blinded and assessor-blinded, randomised controlled feasibility trial. METHODS: Twenty-eight participants with shoulder subacromial pain were randomly allocated into one of two intervention groups—tailored or standardised exercise. Participants in the tailored exercise programme received exercises and manual therapy tailored to their scapular and shoulder movement impairments. Participants in the standardised exercise programme received progressive strengthening exercise. The primary outcome measures were (1) the participant recruitment rate; (2) the proportion of participants enrolled from the total number screened; (3) drop-out rates; and (4) adherence to the rehabilitation programme. Other outcome measures were: (5) pain levels; (6) Patient-Specific Functional Scale; (7) the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; and (8) pain self-efficacy. We compared changes in pain and disability scores between groups using a repeated mixed-model analysis of variance. Since this is a feasibility study, we did not adjust alpha for multiple comparisons, and considered 75% CI as the probability threshold at 3-month follow-up. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Short-Form 12 and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated. RESULTS: The recruitment rate was 3 participants per month, the proportion of participants enrolled was 23%, the drop-out rate was 14% and the overall adherence to the rehabilitation programme was 85%. No between-group differences were found for most outcome measures. Adverse events (n=2, only in the tailored group) were minor in nature and included skin injury or pain following taping. CONCLUSIONS: Our feasibility trial showed that additional strategies are required for improving recruitment, enrolment and minimising drop-out of participants into the trial and making it feasible to conduct a full trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTR: 12617001405303. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9207741/ /pubmed/35710235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053572 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Sports and Exercise Medicine
Ribeiro, Daniel C
Jafarian Tangrood, Zohreh
Wilson, Ross
Sole, Gisela
Abbott, J Haxby
Tailored exercise and manual therapy versus standardised exercise for patients with shoulder subacromial pain: a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the Otago MASTER trial)
title Tailored exercise and manual therapy versus standardised exercise for patients with shoulder subacromial pain: a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the Otago MASTER trial)
title_full Tailored exercise and manual therapy versus standardised exercise for patients with shoulder subacromial pain: a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the Otago MASTER trial)
title_fullStr Tailored exercise and manual therapy versus standardised exercise for patients with shoulder subacromial pain: a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the Otago MASTER trial)
title_full_unstemmed Tailored exercise and manual therapy versus standardised exercise for patients with shoulder subacromial pain: a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the Otago MASTER trial)
title_short Tailored exercise and manual therapy versus standardised exercise for patients with shoulder subacromial pain: a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the Otago MASTER trial)
title_sort tailored exercise and manual therapy versus standardised exercise for patients with shoulder subacromial pain: a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the otago master trial)
topic Sports and Exercise Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9207741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35710235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053572
work_keys_str_mv AT ribeirodanielc tailoredexerciseandmanualtherapyversusstandardisedexerciseforpatientswithshouldersubacromialpainafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtheotagomastertrial
AT jafariantangroodzohreh tailoredexerciseandmanualtherapyversusstandardisedexerciseforpatientswithshouldersubacromialpainafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtheotagomastertrial
AT wilsonross tailoredexerciseandmanualtherapyversusstandardisedexerciseforpatientswithshouldersubacromialpainafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtheotagomastertrial
AT solegisela tailoredexerciseandmanualtherapyversusstandardisedexerciseforpatientswithshouldersubacromialpainafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtheotagomastertrial
AT abbottjhaxby tailoredexerciseandmanualtherapyversusstandardisedexerciseforpatientswithshouldersubacromialpainafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtheotagomastertrial