Cargando…

Comparing Types of Yoga for Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain in Military Personnel: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain (cLBP) and chronic neck pain (cNP) are highly prevalent conditions and common reasons for disability among military personnel. Yoga and other mind-body interventions have been shown to safely decrease pain and disability in persons with cLBP and/or cNP but have not...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Groessl, Erik J, Casteel, Danielle, McKinnon, Symone, McCarthy, Adhana, Schmalzl, Laura, Chang, Douglas G, Fowler, Ian M, Park, Crystal L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9208032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35734420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2164957X221094596
_version_ 1784729653288632320
author Groessl, Erik J
Casteel, Danielle
McKinnon, Symone
McCarthy, Adhana
Schmalzl, Laura
Chang, Douglas G
Fowler, Ian M
Park, Crystal L
author_facet Groessl, Erik J
Casteel, Danielle
McKinnon, Symone
McCarthy, Adhana
Schmalzl, Laura
Chang, Douglas G
Fowler, Ian M
Park, Crystal L
author_sort Groessl, Erik J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain (cLBP) and chronic neck pain (cNP) are highly prevalent conditions and common reasons for disability among military personnel. Yoga and other mind-body interventions have been shown to safely decrease pain and disability in persons with cLBP and/or cNP but have not been adequately studied in active duty military personnel. The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of delivering 2 types of yoga (hatha and restorative) to a sample of active-duty military personnel with cLBP/cNP. METHODS: Military personnel with cLBP and/or cNP (n = 49; 59% men) were randomized to either hatha or restorative yoga interventions. Interventions consisted of in-person yoga 1-2x weekly for 12 weeks. Feasibility and acceptability were measured by rates of recruitment, intervention attendance, attrition, adverse events, and satisfaction ratings. Health outcomes including pain and disability were measured at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months. Means and effect sizes are presented. RESULTS: Recruitment was completed ahead of projections. Over 90% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that they enjoyed participation, liked the instructor, and would like to continue yoga. Retention rates were 86% and 80% at 12 week and 6 month assessments, respectively. Intervention attendance was adequate but lower than expected. There were small to moderate reductions in back-pain related disability, pain severity and pain interference, and improvements in quality of life, grip strength, and balance. In general, effects were larger for those who attended at least 50% of intervention classes. Participants with cNP tended to have smaller outcome improvements, but conclusions remain tentative given small sample sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate feasibility for conducting a randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial of yoga for cLBP and cNP among active duty military personnel. Acceptability was also established. Ongoing work will enhance the intervention for cNP and establish feasibility at another military facility in preparation for a fully-powered comparative effectiveness trial. ClinicalTrials #NCT03504085; registered April 20, 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9208032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92080322022-06-21 Comparing Types of Yoga for Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain in Military Personnel: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial Groessl, Erik J Casteel, Danielle McKinnon, Symone McCarthy, Adhana Schmalzl, Laura Chang, Douglas G Fowler, Ian M Park, Crystal L Glob Adv Health Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain (cLBP) and chronic neck pain (cNP) are highly prevalent conditions and common reasons for disability among military personnel. Yoga and other mind-body interventions have been shown to safely decrease pain and disability in persons with cLBP and/or cNP but have not been adequately studied in active duty military personnel. The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of delivering 2 types of yoga (hatha and restorative) to a sample of active-duty military personnel with cLBP/cNP. METHODS: Military personnel with cLBP and/or cNP (n = 49; 59% men) were randomized to either hatha or restorative yoga interventions. Interventions consisted of in-person yoga 1-2x weekly for 12 weeks. Feasibility and acceptability were measured by rates of recruitment, intervention attendance, attrition, adverse events, and satisfaction ratings. Health outcomes including pain and disability were measured at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months. Means and effect sizes are presented. RESULTS: Recruitment was completed ahead of projections. Over 90% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that they enjoyed participation, liked the instructor, and would like to continue yoga. Retention rates were 86% and 80% at 12 week and 6 month assessments, respectively. Intervention attendance was adequate but lower than expected. There were small to moderate reductions in back-pain related disability, pain severity and pain interference, and improvements in quality of life, grip strength, and balance. In general, effects were larger for those who attended at least 50% of intervention classes. Participants with cNP tended to have smaller outcome improvements, but conclusions remain tentative given small sample sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate feasibility for conducting a randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial of yoga for cLBP and cNP among active duty military personnel. Acceptability was also established. Ongoing work will enhance the intervention for cNP and establish feasibility at another military facility in preparation for a fully-powered comparative effectiveness trial. ClinicalTrials #NCT03504085; registered April 20, 2018. SAGE Publications 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9208032/ /pubmed/35734420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2164957X221094596 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Groessl, Erik J
Casteel, Danielle
McKinnon, Symone
McCarthy, Adhana
Schmalzl, Laura
Chang, Douglas G
Fowler, Ian M
Park, Crystal L
Comparing Types of Yoga for Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain in Military Personnel: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
title Comparing Types of Yoga for Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain in Military Personnel: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparing Types of Yoga for Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain in Military Personnel: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparing Types of Yoga for Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain in Military Personnel: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Types of Yoga for Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain in Military Personnel: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparing Types of Yoga for Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain in Military Personnel: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparing types of yoga for chronic low back and neck pain in military personnel: a feasibility randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9208032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35734420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2164957X221094596
work_keys_str_mv AT groesslerikj comparingtypesofyogaforchroniclowbackandneckpaininmilitarypersonnelafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT casteeldanielle comparingtypesofyogaforchroniclowbackandneckpaininmilitarypersonnelafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mckinnonsymone comparingtypesofyogaforchroniclowbackandneckpaininmilitarypersonnelafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mccarthyadhana comparingtypesofyogaforchroniclowbackandneckpaininmilitarypersonnelafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schmalzllaura comparingtypesofyogaforchroniclowbackandneckpaininmilitarypersonnelafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT changdouglasg comparingtypesofyogaforchroniclowbackandneckpaininmilitarypersonnelafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fowlerianm comparingtypesofyogaforchroniclowbackandneckpaininmilitarypersonnelafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT parkcrystall comparingtypesofyogaforchroniclowbackandneckpaininmilitarypersonnelafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrial