Cargando…
Bone loss in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: management and outcomes
BACKGROUND: Although several techniques and implants have been developed to address bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), management of these defects remains challenging. This review article discusses the indications and management options of bone loss following total knee arthroplas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9208118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35725586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-022-00158-y |
_version_ | 1784729672351744000 |
---|---|
author | Bieganowski, Thomas Buchalter, Daniel B. Singh, Vivek Mercuri, John J. Aggarwal, Vinay K. Rozell, Joshua C. Schwarzkopf, Ran |
author_facet | Bieganowski, Thomas Buchalter, Daniel B. Singh, Vivek Mercuri, John J. Aggarwal, Vinay K. Rozell, Joshua C. Schwarzkopf, Ran |
author_sort | Bieganowski, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although several techniques and implants have been developed to address bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), management of these defects remains challenging. This review article discusses the indications and management options of bone loss following total knee arthroplasty based on preoperative workup and intraoperative findings. MAIN TEXT: Various imaging modalities are available that can be augmented with intraoperative examination to provide a clear classification of a bony defect. For this reason, the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) classification is frequently used to guide treatment. The AORI provides a reliable system by which surgeons can classify lesions based on their size and involvement of surrounding structures. AORI type I defects are managed with cement with or without screws as well as impaction bone grafting. For AORI type IIA lesions, wedge or block augmentation is available. For large defects encompassing AORI type IIB and type III defects, bulk allografts, cones, sleeves, and megaprostheses can be used in conjunction with intramedullary stems. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of bone loss in rTKA continues to evolve as different techniques and approaches have been validated through short- and mid-term follow-up. Extensive preoperative planning with imaging, accurate intraoperative evaluation of the bone loss, and comprehensive understanding of all the implant options available for the bone loss are paramount to success. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9208118 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92081182022-06-21 Bone loss in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: management and outcomes Bieganowski, Thomas Buchalter, Daniel B. Singh, Vivek Mercuri, John J. Aggarwal, Vinay K. Rozell, Joshua C. Schwarzkopf, Ran Knee Surg Relat Res Review Article BACKGROUND: Although several techniques and implants have been developed to address bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), management of these defects remains challenging. This review article discusses the indications and management options of bone loss following total knee arthroplasty based on preoperative workup and intraoperative findings. MAIN TEXT: Various imaging modalities are available that can be augmented with intraoperative examination to provide a clear classification of a bony defect. For this reason, the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) classification is frequently used to guide treatment. The AORI provides a reliable system by which surgeons can classify lesions based on their size and involvement of surrounding structures. AORI type I defects are managed with cement with or without screws as well as impaction bone grafting. For AORI type IIA lesions, wedge or block augmentation is available. For large defects encompassing AORI type IIB and type III defects, bulk allografts, cones, sleeves, and megaprostheses can be used in conjunction with intramedullary stems. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of bone loss in rTKA continues to evolve as different techniques and approaches have been validated through short- and mid-term follow-up. Extensive preoperative planning with imaging, accurate intraoperative evaluation of the bone loss, and comprehensive understanding of all the implant options available for the bone loss are paramount to success. BioMed Central 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9208118/ /pubmed/35725586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-022-00158-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Bieganowski, Thomas Buchalter, Daniel B. Singh, Vivek Mercuri, John J. Aggarwal, Vinay K. Rozell, Joshua C. Schwarzkopf, Ran Bone loss in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: management and outcomes |
title | Bone loss in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: management and outcomes |
title_full | Bone loss in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: management and outcomes |
title_fullStr | Bone loss in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: management and outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Bone loss in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: management and outcomes |
title_short | Bone loss in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: management and outcomes |
title_sort | bone loss in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: management and outcomes |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9208118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35725586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-022-00158-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bieganowskithomas bonelossinasepticrevisiontotalkneearthroplastymanagementandoutcomes AT buchalterdanielb bonelossinasepticrevisiontotalkneearthroplastymanagementandoutcomes AT singhvivek bonelossinasepticrevisiontotalkneearthroplastymanagementandoutcomes AT mercurijohnj bonelossinasepticrevisiontotalkneearthroplastymanagementandoutcomes AT aggarwalvinayk bonelossinasepticrevisiontotalkneearthroplastymanagementandoutcomes AT rozelljoshuac bonelossinasepticrevisiontotalkneearthroplastymanagementandoutcomes AT schwarzkopfran bonelossinasepticrevisiontotalkneearthroplastymanagementandoutcomes |