Cargando…
Development and validation of the Chinese version of the perceived partner responsiveness scale (C-PPRS)
BACKGROUND: Perceived partner responsiveness (PPR) refers to the belief that the relational partner knows and is sensitive and supportive. Instead of translating the English version of the Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale (PPRS) into Chinese, this study aimed to construct and analyze the psych...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9208143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35725576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00865-x |
_version_ | 1784729678173437952 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Xinyi Cai, Yaochun Huang, Wanyi Chen, Qishan |
author_facet | Zhou, Xinyi Cai, Yaochun Huang, Wanyi Chen, Qishan |
author_sort | Zhou, Xinyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Perceived partner responsiveness (PPR) refers to the belief that the relational partner knows and is sensitive and supportive. Instead of translating the English version of the Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale (PPRS) into Chinese, this study aimed to construct and analyze the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale (C-PPRS). On the one hand, some words in the original scale are inappropriate for the Chinese due to cultural differences. On the other hand, we intended the scale to apply just to persons in romantic relationships, not to friends or roommates. METHOD: We conducted two studies. In the first study, 441 participants who completed the C-PPRS were randomly divided into two samples for exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was assessed in a group of 224 participants who completed the C-PPRS and the Quality of Relationship Index in the second study. RESULTS: The results indicated that the four-factor model (understanding, intimacy, acceptance, and trust) was a feasible representation of the C-PPRS factor structure (χ(2)/df = 2.27, CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.08, SRMR = 0.05) and had robust internal consistency reliability (alpha = 0.90) and concurrent validity (moderately correlated with the Quality of Relationship Index, r = 0.66, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PPR is a concept to understand the psychological manifestations of a person who believes that his or her partner is concerned with core characteristics of the self. The C-PPRS has good psychometric characteristics to evaluate such manifestations and can be applied to future intimacy research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40359-022-00865-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9208143 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92081432022-06-21 Development and validation of the Chinese version of the perceived partner responsiveness scale (C-PPRS) Zhou, Xinyi Cai, Yaochun Huang, Wanyi Chen, Qishan BMC Psychol Research BACKGROUND: Perceived partner responsiveness (PPR) refers to the belief that the relational partner knows and is sensitive and supportive. Instead of translating the English version of the Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale (PPRS) into Chinese, this study aimed to construct and analyze the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale (C-PPRS). On the one hand, some words in the original scale are inappropriate for the Chinese due to cultural differences. On the other hand, we intended the scale to apply just to persons in romantic relationships, not to friends or roommates. METHOD: We conducted two studies. In the first study, 441 participants who completed the C-PPRS were randomly divided into two samples for exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was assessed in a group of 224 participants who completed the C-PPRS and the Quality of Relationship Index in the second study. RESULTS: The results indicated that the four-factor model (understanding, intimacy, acceptance, and trust) was a feasible representation of the C-PPRS factor structure (χ(2)/df = 2.27, CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.08, SRMR = 0.05) and had robust internal consistency reliability (alpha = 0.90) and concurrent validity (moderately correlated with the Quality of Relationship Index, r = 0.66, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PPR is a concept to understand the psychological manifestations of a person who believes that his or her partner is concerned with core characteristics of the self. The C-PPRS has good psychometric characteristics to evaluate such manifestations and can be applied to future intimacy research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40359-022-00865-x. BioMed Central 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9208143/ /pubmed/35725576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00865-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Zhou, Xinyi Cai, Yaochun Huang, Wanyi Chen, Qishan Development and validation of the Chinese version of the perceived partner responsiveness scale (C-PPRS) |
title | Development and validation of the Chinese version of the perceived partner responsiveness scale (C-PPRS) |
title_full | Development and validation of the Chinese version of the perceived partner responsiveness scale (C-PPRS) |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of the Chinese version of the perceived partner responsiveness scale (C-PPRS) |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of the Chinese version of the perceived partner responsiveness scale (C-PPRS) |
title_short | Development and validation of the Chinese version of the perceived partner responsiveness scale (C-PPRS) |
title_sort | development and validation of the chinese version of the perceived partner responsiveness scale (c-pprs) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9208143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35725576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00865-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouxinyi developmentandvalidationofthechineseversionoftheperceivedpartnerresponsivenessscalecpprs AT caiyaochun developmentandvalidationofthechineseversionoftheperceivedpartnerresponsivenessscalecpprs AT huangwanyi developmentandvalidationofthechineseversionoftheperceivedpartnerresponsivenessscalecpprs AT chenqishan developmentandvalidationofthechineseversionoftheperceivedpartnerresponsivenessscalecpprs |