Cargando…
A Delphi study of rescue and clinical subject matter experts on the extrication of patients following a motor vehicle collision
BACKGROUND: Approximately 1.3 million people die each year globally as a direct result of motor vehicle collisions (MVCs). Following an MVC some patients will remain trapped in their vehicle; these patients have worse outcomes and may require extrication. Following new evidence, updated multidiscipl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9208189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35725580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01029-x |
_version_ | 1784729688575311872 |
---|---|
author | Nutbeam, Tim Fenwick, Rob Smith, Jason E. Dayson, Mike Carlin, Brian Wilson, Mark Wallis, Lee Stassen, Willem |
author_facet | Nutbeam, Tim Fenwick, Rob Smith, Jason E. Dayson, Mike Carlin, Brian Wilson, Mark Wallis, Lee Stassen, Willem |
author_sort | Nutbeam, Tim |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Approximately 1.3 million people die each year globally as a direct result of motor vehicle collisions (MVCs). Following an MVC some patients will remain trapped in their vehicle; these patients have worse outcomes and may require extrication. Following new evidence, updated multidisciplinary guidance for extrication is needed. METHODS: This Delphi study has been developed, conducted and reported to CREDES standards. A literature review identified areas of expertise and appropriate individuals were recruited to a Steering Group. The Steering Group formulated initial statements for consideration. Stakeholder organisations were invited to identify subject matter experts (SMEs) from a rescue and clinical background (total 60). SMEs participated over three rounds via an online platform. Consensus for agreement / disagreement was set at 70%. At each stage SMEs could offer feedback on, or modification to the statements considered which was reviewed and incorporated into new statements or new supporting information for the following rounds. Stakeholders agreed a set of principles based on the consensus statements on which future guidance should be based. RESULTS: Sixty SMEs completed Round 1, 53 Round 2 (88%) and 49 Round 3 (82%). Consensus was reached on 91 statements (89 agree, 2 disagree) covering a broad range of domains related to: extrication terminology, extrication goals and approach, self-extrication, disentanglement, clinical care, immobilisation, patient-focused extrication, emergency services call and triage, and audit and research standards. Thirty-three statements did not reach consensus. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated consensus across a large panel of multidisciplinary SMEs on many key areas of extrication and related practice that will provide a key foundation in the development of evidence-based guidance for this subject area. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-022-01029-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9208189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92081892022-06-21 A Delphi study of rescue and clinical subject matter experts on the extrication of patients following a motor vehicle collision Nutbeam, Tim Fenwick, Rob Smith, Jason E. Dayson, Mike Carlin, Brian Wilson, Mark Wallis, Lee Stassen, Willem Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Approximately 1.3 million people die each year globally as a direct result of motor vehicle collisions (MVCs). Following an MVC some patients will remain trapped in their vehicle; these patients have worse outcomes and may require extrication. Following new evidence, updated multidisciplinary guidance for extrication is needed. METHODS: This Delphi study has been developed, conducted and reported to CREDES standards. A literature review identified areas of expertise and appropriate individuals were recruited to a Steering Group. The Steering Group formulated initial statements for consideration. Stakeholder organisations were invited to identify subject matter experts (SMEs) from a rescue and clinical background (total 60). SMEs participated over three rounds via an online platform. Consensus for agreement / disagreement was set at 70%. At each stage SMEs could offer feedback on, or modification to the statements considered which was reviewed and incorporated into new statements or new supporting information for the following rounds. Stakeholders agreed a set of principles based on the consensus statements on which future guidance should be based. RESULTS: Sixty SMEs completed Round 1, 53 Round 2 (88%) and 49 Round 3 (82%). Consensus was reached on 91 statements (89 agree, 2 disagree) covering a broad range of domains related to: extrication terminology, extrication goals and approach, self-extrication, disentanglement, clinical care, immobilisation, patient-focused extrication, emergency services call and triage, and audit and research standards. Thirty-three statements did not reach consensus. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated consensus across a large panel of multidisciplinary SMEs on many key areas of extrication and related practice that will provide a key foundation in the development of evidence-based guidance for this subject area. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-022-01029-x. BioMed Central 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9208189/ /pubmed/35725580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01029-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Nutbeam, Tim Fenwick, Rob Smith, Jason E. Dayson, Mike Carlin, Brian Wilson, Mark Wallis, Lee Stassen, Willem A Delphi study of rescue and clinical subject matter experts on the extrication of patients following a motor vehicle collision |
title | A Delphi study of rescue and clinical subject matter experts on the extrication of patients following a motor vehicle collision |
title_full | A Delphi study of rescue and clinical subject matter experts on the extrication of patients following a motor vehicle collision |
title_fullStr | A Delphi study of rescue and clinical subject matter experts on the extrication of patients following a motor vehicle collision |
title_full_unstemmed | A Delphi study of rescue and clinical subject matter experts on the extrication of patients following a motor vehicle collision |
title_short | A Delphi study of rescue and clinical subject matter experts on the extrication of patients following a motor vehicle collision |
title_sort | delphi study of rescue and clinical subject matter experts on the extrication of patients following a motor vehicle collision |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9208189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35725580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01029-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nutbeamtim adelphistudyofrescueandclinicalsubjectmatterexpertsontheextricationofpatientsfollowingamotorvehiclecollision AT fenwickrob adelphistudyofrescueandclinicalsubjectmatterexpertsontheextricationofpatientsfollowingamotorvehiclecollision AT smithjasone adelphistudyofrescueandclinicalsubjectmatterexpertsontheextricationofpatientsfollowingamotorvehiclecollision AT daysonmike adelphistudyofrescueandclinicalsubjectmatterexpertsontheextricationofpatientsfollowingamotorvehiclecollision AT carlinbrian adelphistudyofrescueandclinicalsubjectmatterexpertsontheextricationofpatientsfollowingamotorvehiclecollision AT wilsonmark adelphistudyofrescueandclinicalsubjectmatterexpertsontheextricationofpatientsfollowingamotorvehiclecollision AT wallislee adelphistudyofrescueandclinicalsubjectmatterexpertsontheextricationofpatientsfollowingamotorvehiclecollision AT stassenwillem adelphistudyofrescueandclinicalsubjectmatterexpertsontheextricationofpatientsfollowingamotorvehiclecollision AT nutbeamtim delphistudyofrescueandclinicalsubjectmatterexpertsontheextricationofpatientsfollowingamotorvehiclecollision AT fenwickrob delphistudyofrescueandclinicalsubjectmatterexpertsontheextricationofpatientsfollowingamotorvehiclecollision AT smithjasone delphistudyofrescueandclinicalsubjectmatterexpertsontheextricationofpatientsfollowingamotorvehiclecollision AT daysonmike delphistudyofrescueandclinicalsubjectmatterexpertsontheextricationofpatientsfollowingamotorvehiclecollision AT carlinbrian delphistudyofrescueandclinicalsubjectmatterexpertsontheextricationofpatientsfollowingamotorvehiclecollision AT wilsonmark delphistudyofrescueandclinicalsubjectmatterexpertsontheextricationofpatientsfollowingamotorvehiclecollision AT wallislee delphistudyofrescueandclinicalsubjectmatterexpertsontheextricationofpatientsfollowingamotorvehiclecollision AT stassenwillem delphistudyofrescueandclinicalsubjectmatterexpertsontheextricationofpatientsfollowingamotorvehiclecollision |