Cargando…
North-African doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey
INTRODUCTION: Physicians involved in medical errors (MEs) can experience loss of self-esteem and negative psychological experiences. They are called “second victims” of the ME. AIMS: To i) describe the profile, the types and the severity of MEs, and ii) explore the psychological impact on “second vi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9208235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35718779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04049-0 |
_version_ | 1784729699304341504 |
---|---|
author | Ben Saida, Imen Grira, Sabil Toumi, Radhouane Ghodhbani, Amani Ennouri, Emna Meddeb, Khaoula Ben Saad, Helmi Boussarsar, Mohamed |
author_facet | Ben Saida, Imen Grira, Sabil Toumi, Radhouane Ghodhbani, Amani Ennouri, Emna Meddeb, Khaoula Ben Saad, Helmi Boussarsar, Mohamed |
author_sort | Ben Saida, Imen |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Physicians involved in medical errors (MEs) can experience loss of self-esteem and negative psychological experiences. They are called “second victims” of the ME. AIMS: To i) describe the profile, the types and the severity of MEs, and ii) explore the psychological impact on “second victims” to better understand how they cope. METHODS: It was a cross sectional retrospective study conducted from March to August 2018. All physicians working at Farhat Hached and Sahloul University hospitals were asked to complete a questionnaire about their possible MEs. The impact of MEs was evaluated using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) (scoring, 0–88) (subscales ranges; intrusion, (0–32); avoidance, (0–32); hyperarousal, (0–24)). The diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was made when the total IES-R score exceeded 33. The coping strategies were evaluated using Ways of Coping Checklist Revised (WCC-R) scale (scoring, problem-focused, (10–40); emotion focused, (9–36); seeking social support, (8–32)). RESULTS: Among 393 responders, 268(68.2%) reported MEs. Wrong diagnosis (40.5%), faulty treatment (34.6%), preventive errors (13.5%) and faulty communication (6.4%) were the main frequent types of MEs. The most common related causes of MEs were inexperience (47.3%) and job overload (40.2%). The physicians’ median (range) score of the IES-R was 19(0–69). According to the IES-R score, the most frequent psychological impacts were median (range): intrusion, 7(0–28) and avoidance symptoms, 7(0–24). PTSD symptoms affected 23.5% of physicians. Female sex and serious MEs were identified as predictors of PTSD. On the WCC-R check list, coping was balanced between the three coping strategies median (range), problem focused, 28.5(10–40); emotion-focused, 24(9–36) and seeking social support 21(8–32). CONCLUSION: There is a relatively high impact of ME within these North-African university hospital physicians. Coping was balanced within different three strategies as reported worldwide. Physicians adopted more likely constructive changes than defensive ones. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-022-04049-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9208235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92082352022-06-21 North-African doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey Ben Saida, Imen Grira, Sabil Toumi, Radhouane Ghodhbani, Amani Ennouri, Emna Meddeb, Khaoula Ben Saad, Helmi Boussarsar, Mohamed BMC Psychiatry Research INTRODUCTION: Physicians involved in medical errors (MEs) can experience loss of self-esteem and negative psychological experiences. They are called “second victims” of the ME. AIMS: To i) describe the profile, the types and the severity of MEs, and ii) explore the psychological impact on “second victims” to better understand how they cope. METHODS: It was a cross sectional retrospective study conducted from March to August 2018. All physicians working at Farhat Hached and Sahloul University hospitals were asked to complete a questionnaire about their possible MEs. The impact of MEs was evaluated using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) (scoring, 0–88) (subscales ranges; intrusion, (0–32); avoidance, (0–32); hyperarousal, (0–24)). The diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was made when the total IES-R score exceeded 33. The coping strategies were evaluated using Ways of Coping Checklist Revised (WCC-R) scale (scoring, problem-focused, (10–40); emotion focused, (9–36); seeking social support, (8–32)). RESULTS: Among 393 responders, 268(68.2%) reported MEs. Wrong diagnosis (40.5%), faulty treatment (34.6%), preventive errors (13.5%) and faulty communication (6.4%) were the main frequent types of MEs. The most common related causes of MEs were inexperience (47.3%) and job overload (40.2%). The physicians’ median (range) score of the IES-R was 19(0–69). According to the IES-R score, the most frequent psychological impacts were median (range): intrusion, 7(0–28) and avoidance symptoms, 7(0–24). PTSD symptoms affected 23.5% of physicians. Female sex and serious MEs were identified as predictors of PTSD. On the WCC-R check list, coping was balanced between the three coping strategies median (range), problem focused, 28.5(10–40); emotion-focused, 24(9–36) and seeking social support 21(8–32). CONCLUSION: There is a relatively high impact of ME within these North-African university hospital physicians. Coping was balanced within different three strategies as reported worldwide. Physicians adopted more likely constructive changes than defensive ones. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-022-04049-0. BioMed Central 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9208235/ /pubmed/35718779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04049-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ben Saida, Imen Grira, Sabil Toumi, Radhouane Ghodhbani, Amani Ennouri, Emna Meddeb, Khaoula Ben Saad, Helmi Boussarsar, Mohamed North-African doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey |
title | North-African doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey |
title_full | North-African doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey |
title_fullStr | North-African doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey |
title_full_unstemmed | North-African doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey |
title_short | North-African doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey |
title_sort | north-african doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9208235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35718779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04049-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bensaidaimen northafricandoctorsassecondvictimsofmedicalerrorsacrosssectionalsurvey AT grirasabil northafricandoctorsassecondvictimsofmedicalerrorsacrosssectionalsurvey AT toumiradhouane northafricandoctorsassecondvictimsofmedicalerrorsacrosssectionalsurvey AT ghodhbaniamani northafricandoctorsassecondvictimsofmedicalerrorsacrosssectionalsurvey AT ennouriemna northafricandoctorsassecondvictimsofmedicalerrorsacrosssectionalsurvey AT meddebkhaoula northafricandoctorsassecondvictimsofmedicalerrorsacrosssectionalsurvey AT bensaadhelmi northafricandoctorsassecondvictimsofmedicalerrorsacrosssectionalsurvey AT boussarsarmohamed northafricandoctorsassecondvictimsofmedicalerrorsacrosssectionalsurvey |