Cargando…

North-African doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey

INTRODUCTION: Physicians involved in medical errors (MEs) can experience loss of self-esteem and negative psychological experiences. They are called “second victims” of the ME. AIMS: To i) describe the profile, the types and the severity of MEs, and ii) explore the psychological impact on “second vi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ben Saida, Imen, Grira, Sabil, Toumi, Radhouane, Ghodhbani, Amani, Ennouri, Emna, Meddeb, Khaoula, Ben Saad, Helmi, Boussarsar, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9208235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35718779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04049-0
_version_ 1784729699304341504
author Ben Saida, Imen
Grira, Sabil
Toumi, Radhouane
Ghodhbani, Amani
Ennouri, Emna
Meddeb, Khaoula
Ben Saad, Helmi
Boussarsar, Mohamed
author_facet Ben Saida, Imen
Grira, Sabil
Toumi, Radhouane
Ghodhbani, Amani
Ennouri, Emna
Meddeb, Khaoula
Ben Saad, Helmi
Boussarsar, Mohamed
author_sort Ben Saida, Imen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Physicians involved in medical errors (MEs) can experience loss of self-esteem and negative psychological experiences. They are called “second victims” of the ME. AIMS: To i) describe the profile, the types and the severity of MEs, and ii) explore the psychological impact on “second victims” to better understand how they cope. METHODS: It was a cross sectional retrospective study conducted from March to August 2018. All physicians working at Farhat Hached and Sahloul University hospitals were asked to complete a questionnaire about their possible MEs. The impact of MEs was evaluated using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) (scoring, 0–88) (subscales ranges; intrusion, (0–32); avoidance, (0–32); hyperarousal, (0–24)). The diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was made when the total IES-R score exceeded 33. The coping strategies were evaluated using Ways of Coping Checklist Revised (WCC-R) scale (scoring, problem-focused, (10–40); emotion focused, (9–36); seeking social support, (8–32)). RESULTS: Among 393 responders, 268(68.2%) reported MEs. Wrong diagnosis (40.5%), faulty treatment (34.6%), preventive errors (13.5%) and faulty communication (6.4%) were the main frequent types of MEs. The most common related causes of MEs were inexperience (47.3%) and job overload (40.2%). The physicians’ median (range) score of the IES-R was 19(0–69). According to the IES-R score, the most frequent psychological impacts were median (range): intrusion, 7(0–28) and avoidance symptoms, 7(0–24). PTSD symptoms affected 23.5% of physicians. Female sex and serious MEs were identified as predictors of PTSD. On the WCC-R check list, coping was balanced between the three coping strategies median (range), problem focused, 28.5(10–40); emotion-focused, 24(9–36) and seeking social support 21(8–32). CONCLUSION: There is a relatively high impact of ME within these North-African university hospital physicians. Coping was balanced within different three strategies as reported worldwide. Physicians adopted more likely constructive changes than defensive ones. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-022-04049-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9208235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92082352022-06-21 North-African doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey Ben Saida, Imen Grira, Sabil Toumi, Radhouane Ghodhbani, Amani Ennouri, Emna Meddeb, Khaoula Ben Saad, Helmi Boussarsar, Mohamed BMC Psychiatry Research INTRODUCTION: Physicians involved in medical errors (MEs) can experience loss of self-esteem and negative psychological experiences. They are called “second victims” of the ME. AIMS: To i) describe the profile, the types and the severity of MEs, and ii) explore the psychological impact on “second victims” to better understand how they cope. METHODS: It was a cross sectional retrospective study conducted from March to August 2018. All physicians working at Farhat Hached and Sahloul University hospitals were asked to complete a questionnaire about their possible MEs. The impact of MEs was evaluated using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) (scoring, 0–88) (subscales ranges; intrusion, (0–32); avoidance, (0–32); hyperarousal, (0–24)). The diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was made when the total IES-R score exceeded 33. The coping strategies were evaluated using Ways of Coping Checklist Revised (WCC-R) scale (scoring, problem-focused, (10–40); emotion focused, (9–36); seeking social support, (8–32)). RESULTS: Among 393 responders, 268(68.2%) reported MEs. Wrong diagnosis (40.5%), faulty treatment (34.6%), preventive errors (13.5%) and faulty communication (6.4%) were the main frequent types of MEs. The most common related causes of MEs were inexperience (47.3%) and job overload (40.2%). The physicians’ median (range) score of the IES-R was 19(0–69). According to the IES-R score, the most frequent psychological impacts were median (range): intrusion, 7(0–28) and avoidance symptoms, 7(0–24). PTSD symptoms affected 23.5% of physicians. Female sex and serious MEs were identified as predictors of PTSD. On the WCC-R check list, coping was balanced between the three coping strategies median (range), problem focused, 28.5(10–40); emotion-focused, 24(9–36) and seeking social support 21(8–32). CONCLUSION: There is a relatively high impact of ME within these North-African university hospital physicians. Coping was balanced within different three strategies as reported worldwide. Physicians adopted more likely constructive changes than defensive ones. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-022-04049-0. BioMed Central 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9208235/ /pubmed/35718779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04049-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ben Saida, Imen
Grira, Sabil
Toumi, Radhouane
Ghodhbani, Amani
Ennouri, Emna
Meddeb, Khaoula
Ben Saad, Helmi
Boussarsar, Mohamed
North-African doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey
title North-African doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey
title_full North-African doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey
title_fullStr North-African doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed North-African doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey
title_short North-African doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey
title_sort north-african doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9208235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35718779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04049-0
work_keys_str_mv AT bensaidaimen northafricandoctorsassecondvictimsofmedicalerrorsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT grirasabil northafricandoctorsassecondvictimsofmedicalerrorsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT toumiradhouane northafricandoctorsassecondvictimsofmedicalerrorsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT ghodhbaniamani northafricandoctorsassecondvictimsofmedicalerrorsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT ennouriemna northafricandoctorsassecondvictimsofmedicalerrorsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT meddebkhaoula northafricandoctorsassecondvictimsofmedicalerrorsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT bensaadhelmi northafricandoctorsassecondvictimsofmedicalerrorsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT boussarsarmohamed northafricandoctorsassecondvictimsofmedicalerrorsacrosssectionalsurvey