Cargando…
DermACELL Acellular Dermal Matrix in Oncologic Breast Reconstruction: A Cohort Study and Systematic Review
Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are commonly used in tissue expander and direct-to-implant reconstruction following mastectomy. Few studies have reported outcomes of DermACELL use or compared DermACELL with AlloDerm ADM. This study sought to compare outcomes of DermACELL and AlloDerm in oncologic b...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9208874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004396 |
_version_ | 1784729807195471872 |
---|---|
author | Swisher, Austin R. Landau, Mark J. Kadakia, Nikita Holzmer, Stephanie W. Kim, Hahns Y. |
author_facet | Swisher, Austin R. Landau, Mark J. Kadakia, Nikita Holzmer, Stephanie W. Kim, Hahns Y. |
author_sort | Swisher, Austin R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are commonly used in tissue expander and direct-to-implant reconstruction following mastectomy. Few studies have reported outcomes of DermACELL use or compared DermACELL with AlloDerm ADM. This study sought to compare outcomes of DermACELL and AlloDerm in oncologic breast reconstruction and to review the literature reporting outcomes of patients undergoing reconstruction using DermACELL. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare outcomes between DermACELL and AlloDerm ADM, and a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis to evaluate clinical outcomes with DermACELL. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients (128 breasts) undergoing immediate reconstruction were evaluated retrospectively. Chi-square analysis revealed no significant difference in postoperative outcomes between the two groups. Our systematic review of the literature yielded 12 total studies reporting DermACELL use for breast reconstruction encompassing 518 patients and 608 total breasts. A pooled analysis of the published data did not reveal a significant change in the rate of explantation when either chemotherapy or radiation was used. Meta-analysis did not show a significant difference in the rate of any of the complications evaluated. CONCLUSION: DermACELL is safe to use with a relatively consistent complication profile as compared with AlloDerm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9208874 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92088742022-06-22 DermACELL Acellular Dermal Matrix in Oncologic Breast Reconstruction: A Cohort Study and Systematic Review Swisher, Austin R. Landau, Mark J. Kadakia, Nikita Holzmer, Stephanie W. Kim, Hahns Y. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Breast Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are commonly used in tissue expander and direct-to-implant reconstruction following mastectomy. Few studies have reported outcomes of DermACELL use or compared DermACELL with AlloDerm ADM. This study sought to compare outcomes of DermACELL and AlloDerm in oncologic breast reconstruction and to review the literature reporting outcomes of patients undergoing reconstruction using DermACELL. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare outcomes between DermACELL and AlloDerm ADM, and a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis to evaluate clinical outcomes with DermACELL. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients (128 breasts) undergoing immediate reconstruction were evaluated retrospectively. Chi-square analysis revealed no significant difference in postoperative outcomes between the two groups. Our systematic review of the literature yielded 12 total studies reporting DermACELL use for breast reconstruction encompassing 518 patients and 608 total breasts. A pooled analysis of the published data did not reveal a significant change in the rate of explantation when either chemotherapy or radiation was used. Meta-analysis did not show a significant difference in the rate of any of the complications evaluated. CONCLUSION: DermACELL is safe to use with a relatively consistent complication profile as compared with AlloDerm. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9208874/ /pubmed/35747252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004396 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Breast Swisher, Austin R. Landau, Mark J. Kadakia, Nikita Holzmer, Stephanie W. Kim, Hahns Y. DermACELL Acellular Dermal Matrix in Oncologic Breast Reconstruction: A Cohort Study and Systematic Review |
title | DermACELL Acellular Dermal Matrix in Oncologic Breast Reconstruction: A Cohort Study and Systematic Review |
title_full | DermACELL Acellular Dermal Matrix in Oncologic Breast Reconstruction: A Cohort Study and Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | DermACELL Acellular Dermal Matrix in Oncologic Breast Reconstruction: A Cohort Study and Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | DermACELL Acellular Dermal Matrix in Oncologic Breast Reconstruction: A Cohort Study and Systematic Review |
title_short | DermACELL Acellular Dermal Matrix in Oncologic Breast Reconstruction: A Cohort Study and Systematic Review |
title_sort | dermacell acellular dermal matrix in oncologic breast reconstruction: a cohort study and systematic review |
topic | Breast |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9208874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004396 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swisheraustinr dermacellacellulardermalmatrixinoncologicbreastreconstructionacohortstudyandsystematicreview AT landaumarkj dermacellacellulardermalmatrixinoncologicbreastreconstructionacohortstudyandsystematicreview AT kadakianikita dermacellacellulardermalmatrixinoncologicbreastreconstructionacohortstudyandsystematicreview AT holzmerstephaniew dermacellacellulardermalmatrixinoncologicbreastreconstructionacohortstudyandsystematicreview AT kimhahnsy dermacellacellulardermalmatrixinoncologicbreastreconstructionacohortstudyandsystematicreview |