Interventions to improve water, sanitation, and hygiene for preventing soil‐transmitted helminth infection

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that 1.5 billion people are infected with soil‐transmitted helminths (STHs) worldwide. Re‐infection occurs rapidly following deworming, and interruption of transmission is unlikely without complementary control efforts such as improvements in water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) access and behaviours. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of WASH interventions to prevent STH infection. SEARCH METHODS: We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 19 October 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included interventions to improve WASH access or practices in communities where STHs are endemic. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), as well as trials with an external control group where participants (or clusters) were allocated to different interventions using a non‐random method (non‐RCTs). We did not include observational study designs. Our primary outcome was prevalence of any STH infection. Prevalence of individual worms was a secondary outcome, including for Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, hookworm (Ancylostoma duodenale or Necator americanus), or Strongyloides stercoralis. Intensity of infection, measured as a count of eggs per gram of faeces for each species, was another secondary outcome. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently reviewed titles and abstracts and full‐text records for eligibility, performed data extraction, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool for RCTs and the EPOC tool for non‐RCTs. We used a random‐effects meta‐analysis to pool study estimates. We used Moran’s I² statistic to assess heterogeneity and conducted subgroup analyses to explore sources of heterogeneity. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included 32 studies (16 RCTs and 16 non‐RCTs) involving a total of 52,944 participants in the review. Twenty‐two studies (14 RCTs (16 estimates) and eight non‐RCTs (11 estimates)) reported on our primary outcome, prevalence of infection with at least one STH species. Twenty‐one studies reported on the prevalence of A lumbricoides (12 RCTs and 9 non‐RCTs); 17 on the prevalence of T trichiura (9 RCTs and 8 non‐RCTs); 18 on the prevalence of hookworm (10 RCTs and 8 non‐RCTs); and one on the prevalence of S stercoralis (1 non‐RCT). Sixteen studies measured the intensity of infection for an individual STH type. Ten RCTs and five non‐RCTs reported on the intensity of infection of A lumbricoides; eight RCTs and five non‐RCTs measured the intensity of infection of T trichiura; and eight RCTs and five non‐RCTs measured the intensity of hookworm infection. No studies reported on the intensity of infection of S stercoralis. The overall pooled effect estimates showed that the WASH interventions under study may result in a slight reduction of any STH infection, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.86 amongst RCTs (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 1.01; moderate‐certainty evidence) and an OR of 0.71 amongst non‐RCTs (95% CI 0.54 to 0.94; low‐certainty evidence). All six of the meta‐analyses assessing individual worm infection amongst both RCTs and non‐RCTs had pooled estimates in the preventive direction, although all CIs encapsulated the null, leaving the possibility of the null or even harmful effects; the certainty of the evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Individual studies assessing intensity of infection showed mixed evidence supporting WASH. Subgroup analyses focusing on narrow specific subsets of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions did very little to elucidate which interventions might be better than others. Data on intensity of infection (e.g. faecal egg count) were reported in a variety of ways across studies, precluding the pooling of results for this outcome. We did not find any studies reporting adverse events resulting from the WASH interventions under study or from mass drug administration (MDA). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Whilst the available evidence suggests that the WASH interventions under study may slightly protect against STH infection, WASH also serves as a broad preventive measure for many other diseases that have a faecal oral transmission route of transmission. As many of the studies were done in addition to MDA/deworming (i.e. MDA was ongoing in both the intervention and control arm), our data support WHO recommendations for implementation of improvements to basic sanitation and adequate access to safe water alongside MDA. The biological plausibility for improved access to WASH to interrupt transmission of STHs is clear, but WASH interventions as currently delivered have shown impacts that were lower than expected. There is a need for more rigorous and targeted implementation research and process evaluations in order that future WASH interventions can better provide benefit to users. Inconsistent reporting of the intensity of infection underscores the need to define the minimal, standard data that should be collected globally on STHs to enable pooled analyses and comparisons.