Cargando…

478 You liked it, but did you learn anything? A process for redesigning follow-up surveys in attempts to measure success beyond satisfaction

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Project objectives: Collect, analyze, redesign, and redeploy the follow-up surveys sent after services rendered or educational offerings attended to improve outcome measurement. Presentation objectives: Provide a process for others to optimize their assessment surveys. METHODS/STUD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: North, Gemma, Osuna, Shardae, Dezfuli, Ghazal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209021/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.281
_version_ 1784729844209156096
author North, Gemma
Osuna, Shardae
Dezfuli, Ghazal
author_facet North, Gemma
Osuna, Shardae
Dezfuli, Ghazal
author_sort North, Gemma
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Project objectives: Collect, analyze, redesign, and redeploy the follow-up surveys sent after services rendered or educational offerings attended to improve outcome measurement. Presentation objectives: Provide a process for others to optimize their assessment surveys. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A team of interdisciplinary experts from Evaluation and Improvement, Workforce Development, and Administration took a systematic and collaborative approach to optimizing service and educational offering assessment. The team collected all 35 existing surveys currently in use at the CTSA, developed a matrix table to organize findings, cross-analyzed/normed to recognize and reduce bias, engaged other staff and faculty at specific intervals to encourage buy-in, and responded to feedback. The team then updated both surveys and format, programmed revised surveys into a centralized platform, and provided instructions and training for implementation. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: This effort resulted in streamlining both the assessment process and the surveys used by the Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute (SC CTSI). Instead of using different versions of surveys or none at all, now SC CTSI commits to using the same follow-up survey for events and for educational offerings institute-wide, and agrees to store and access that data via a single platform, REDCap, allowing any member to see data in real time. This will allow SC CTSI to monitor and evaluate its short-term outcomes at an institutional level, and determine areas for improvement or best practices. Future plans include training on survey data interpretation for decision making. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Presenters will share lessons learned and considerations when embarking on streamlining assessment practices institute-wide, highlighting the importance of leveraging educational methodology to go beyond measuring satisfaction and into measuring learning. Presenters will share revised surveys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9209021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92090212022-07-01 478 You liked it, but did you learn anything? A process for redesigning follow-up surveys in attempts to measure success beyond satisfaction North, Gemma Osuna, Shardae Dezfuli, Ghazal J Clin Transl Sci Workforce Development OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Project objectives: Collect, analyze, redesign, and redeploy the follow-up surveys sent after services rendered or educational offerings attended to improve outcome measurement. Presentation objectives: Provide a process for others to optimize their assessment surveys. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A team of interdisciplinary experts from Evaluation and Improvement, Workforce Development, and Administration took a systematic and collaborative approach to optimizing service and educational offering assessment. The team collected all 35 existing surveys currently in use at the CTSA, developed a matrix table to organize findings, cross-analyzed/normed to recognize and reduce bias, engaged other staff and faculty at specific intervals to encourage buy-in, and responded to feedback. The team then updated both surveys and format, programmed revised surveys into a centralized platform, and provided instructions and training for implementation. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: This effort resulted in streamlining both the assessment process and the surveys used by the Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute (SC CTSI). Instead of using different versions of surveys or none at all, now SC CTSI commits to using the same follow-up survey for events and for educational offerings institute-wide, and agrees to store and access that data via a single platform, REDCap, allowing any member to see data in real time. This will allow SC CTSI to monitor and evaluate its short-term outcomes at an institutional level, and determine areas for improvement or best practices. Future plans include training on survey data interpretation for decision making. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Presenters will share lessons learned and considerations when embarking on streamlining assessment practices institute-wide, highlighting the importance of leveraging educational methodology to go beyond measuring satisfaction and into measuring learning. Presenters will share revised surveys. Cambridge University Press 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9209021/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.281 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Workforce Development
North, Gemma
Osuna, Shardae
Dezfuli, Ghazal
478 You liked it, but did you learn anything? A process for redesigning follow-up surveys in attempts to measure success beyond satisfaction
title 478 You liked it, but did you learn anything? A process for redesigning follow-up surveys in attempts to measure success beyond satisfaction
title_full 478 You liked it, but did you learn anything? A process for redesigning follow-up surveys in attempts to measure success beyond satisfaction
title_fullStr 478 You liked it, but did you learn anything? A process for redesigning follow-up surveys in attempts to measure success beyond satisfaction
title_full_unstemmed 478 You liked it, but did you learn anything? A process for redesigning follow-up surveys in attempts to measure success beyond satisfaction
title_short 478 You liked it, but did you learn anything? A process for redesigning follow-up surveys in attempts to measure success beyond satisfaction
title_sort 478 you liked it, but did you learn anything? a process for redesigning follow-up surveys in attempts to measure success beyond satisfaction
topic Workforce Development
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209021/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.281
work_keys_str_mv AT northgemma 478youlikeditbutdidyoulearnanythingaprocessforredesigningfollowupsurveysinattemptstomeasuresuccessbeyondsatisfaction
AT osunashardae 478youlikeditbutdidyoulearnanythingaprocessforredesigningfollowupsurveysinattemptstomeasuresuccessbeyondsatisfaction
AT dezfulighazal 478youlikeditbutdidyoulearnanythingaprocessforredesigningfollowupsurveysinattemptstomeasuresuccessbeyondsatisfaction