Cargando…

272 A Longitudinal, Multi-Method, Pilot Triangulation of Family Intensive Care Unit Syndrome

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The objectives of this study are to: 1) Examine the feasibility of using concurrent multi-methodology to quantify the affective, decisional, physical symptom domains of Family Intensive Care Unit Syndrome. 2) Describe the associations between the Family Intensive Care Unit Syndrome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pignatiello, Grant, Hickman, Ronald L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209051/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.147
_version_ 1784729852884025344
author Pignatiello, Grant
Hickman, Ronald L.
author_facet Pignatiello, Grant
Hickman, Ronald L.
author_sort Pignatiello, Grant
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The objectives of this study are to: 1) Examine the feasibility of using concurrent multi-methodology to quantify the affective, decisional, physical symptom domains of Family Intensive Care Unit Syndrome. 2) Describe the associations between the Family Intensive Care Unit Syndrome symptom domains (affective, decisional, physical). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Using a repeated-measures, correlational design, we recruited surrogate decision makers of incapacitated, mechanically ventilated patients within four adult intensive care units at a tertiary medical center in northeast Ohio. We collected baseline data (T1) after obtaining informed consent and follow-up data three (T2) and seven (T3) days post-baseline. We used self-report instruments, behavioral tasks, and accelerometry to measure affective (anxiety & depression), decisional (working memory ability & decision fatigue), and physical (sleep quality & sleep disturbance), symptom domains. For objective 1, we computed completion percentages of each time-point and overall compliance with wearing the accelerometer device. For objective 2, we inspected Spearman correlations. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We recruited and collected baseline data (T1) for 33 participants. Nineteen participants completed the T2 interview and twenty participants completed T3. Eight participants wore the accelerometer device for less than 72 hours and 15 wore the accelerometer for the full study period. At baseline, the physical symptoms (sleep quality & disturbance) were strongly correlated with the affective (anxiety & depression) symptoms, all of which were moderately correlated with one decisional symptom (decision fatigue). One cognitive symptom (working memory dysfunction), was weakly associated with the affective and physical symptom domains, and moderately correlated with the other cognitive symptom (decision fatigue) These associative trends were maintained within and between each time point. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This study identifies potential opportunities for examining the various symptom domains of Family Intensive Care Unit Syndrome. The associations between the domains are consistent with the extant literature, and highlights the need for supportive interventions that mitigate affective and physical symptoms that can compromise decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9209051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92090512022-07-01 272 A Longitudinal, Multi-Method, Pilot Triangulation of Family Intensive Care Unit Syndrome Pignatiello, Grant Hickman, Ronald L. J Clin Transl Sci Valued Approaches OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The objectives of this study are to: 1) Examine the feasibility of using concurrent multi-methodology to quantify the affective, decisional, physical symptom domains of Family Intensive Care Unit Syndrome. 2) Describe the associations between the Family Intensive Care Unit Syndrome symptom domains (affective, decisional, physical). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Using a repeated-measures, correlational design, we recruited surrogate decision makers of incapacitated, mechanically ventilated patients within four adult intensive care units at a tertiary medical center in northeast Ohio. We collected baseline data (T1) after obtaining informed consent and follow-up data three (T2) and seven (T3) days post-baseline. We used self-report instruments, behavioral tasks, and accelerometry to measure affective (anxiety & depression), decisional (working memory ability & decision fatigue), and physical (sleep quality & sleep disturbance), symptom domains. For objective 1, we computed completion percentages of each time-point and overall compliance with wearing the accelerometer device. For objective 2, we inspected Spearman correlations. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We recruited and collected baseline data (T1) for 33 participants. Nineteen participants completed the T2 interview and twenty participants completed T3. Eight participants wore the accelerometer device for less than 72 hours and 15 wore the accelerometer for the full study period. At baseline, the physical symptoms (sleep quality & disturbance) were strongly correlated with the affective (anxiety & depression) symptoms, all of which were moderately correlated with one decisional symptom (decision fatigue). One cognitive symptom (working memory dysfunction), was weakly associated with the affective and physical symptom domains, and moderately correlated with the other cognitive symptom (decision fatigue) These associative trends were maintained within and between each time point. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This study identifies potential opportunities for examining the various symptom domains of Family Intensive Care Unit Syndrome. The associations between the domains are consistent with the extant literature, and highlights the need for supportive interventions that mitigate affective and physical symptoms that can compromise decision-making. Cambridge University Press 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9209051/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.147 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Valued Approaches
Pignatiello, Grant
Hickman, Ronald L.
272 A Longitudinal, Multi-Method, Pilot Triangulation of Family Intensive Care Unit Syndrome
title 272 A Longitudinal, Multi-Method, Pilot Triangulation of Family Intensive Care Unit Syndrome
title_full 272 A Longitudinal, Multi-Method, Pilot Triangulation of Family Intensive Care Unit Syndrome
title_fullStr 272 A Longitudinal, Multi-Method, Pilot Triangulation of Family Intensive Care Unit Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed 272 A Longitudinal, Multi-Method, Pilot Triangulation of Family Intensive Care Unit Syndrome
title_short 272 A Longitudinal, Multi-Method, Pilot Triangulation of Family Intensive Care Unit Syndrome
title_sort 272 a longitudinal, multi-method, pilot triangulation of family intensive care unit syndrome
topic Valued Approaches
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209051/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.147
work_keys_str_mv AT pignatiellogrant 272alongitudinalmultimethodpilottriangulationoffamilyintensivecareunitsyndrome
AT hickmanronaldl 272alongitudinalmultimethodpilottriangulationoffamilyintensivecareunitsyndrome