Cargando…

163 Private or Public Health Insurance and Infant Outcomes in the United States

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Health insurance status is associated with differences in access to healthcare and health outcomes. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that among infants born in the United States, maternal private insurance compared with public Medicaid insurance would be assoc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Desalyn Louise, Carlo, Waldemar, Rahman, Fazlur AKM, Tindal, Rachel, Travers, Colm
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209058/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.71
_version_ 1784729854690721792
author Johnson, Desalyn Louise
Carlo, Waldemar
Rahman, Fazlur AKM
Tindal, Rachel
Travers, Colm
author_facet Johnson, Desalyn Louise
Carlo, Waldemar
Rahman, Fazlur AKM
Tindal, Rachel
Travers, Colm
author_sort Johnson, Desalyn Louise
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Health insurance status is associated with differences in access to healthcare and health outcomes. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that among infants born in the United States, maternal private insurance compared with public Medicaid insurance would be associated with a lower infant mortality rate (IMR). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This ecological study used data from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) WONDER expanded linked birth and infant death records database 2017-2018. We included hospital-born infants from 20 to 42 weeks of gestational age (wga) if the mother had either private or Medicaid insurance. We excluded infants with congenital anomalies and infants who died due to congenital anomalies. We used negative-binomial regression adjusted for race, sex, multiple birth, and any maternal pregnancy risk factors (as defined by the CDC) to determine the difference in IMR between private and Medicaid insurance. Chi-square or Fishers exact test was used to compare differences in categorical variables between groups. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We included 6,901,328 infants; 53.6% had private insurance and 46.4% were insured by Medicaid. Privately insured infants had a lower IMR compared with Medicaid insured infants (2.84/1000 vs. 5.32/1000; adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.71; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.62 to 0.81; p<.0001). The privately insured had higher rates of 1st trimester prenatal care compared to those with Medicaid (85.6% vs. 66.6%; p<.00001). Rates of infant morbidity and maternal morbidity (per CDC definitions) were lower among the privately insured compared to those with Medicaid (both p<.00001). The privately insured had lower rates of preterm (9.1% vs. 11.0%), extremely preterm (0.5% vs. 0.7%), low birth weight (7.1% vs. 9.6%), and extremely low birth weight (0.5% vs. 0.7%) births compared to those with Medicaid (all p<0.001). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Private insurance is associated with a lower IMR compared to Medicaid insurance. Privately insured pregnancies also have higher rates of early prenatal care, less morbidity, and less preterm and low birth weight births. There may be opportunities to improve access to care and pregnancy outcomes among Medicaid insured pregnancies in the United States.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9209058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92090582022-07-01 163 Private or Public Health Insurance and Infant Outcomes in the United States Johnson, Desalyn Louise Carlo, Waldemar Rahman, Fazlur AKM Tindal, Rachel Travers, Colm J Clin Transl Sci Community Engagement OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Health insurance status is associated with differences in access to healthcare and health outcomes. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that among infants born in the United States, maternal private insurance compared with public Medicaid insurance would be associated with a lower infant mortality rate (IMR). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This ecological study used data from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) WONDER expanded linked birth and infant death records database 2017-2018. We included hospital-born infants from 20 to 42 weeks of gestational age (wga) if the mother had either private or Medicaid insurance. We excluded infants with congenital anomalies and infants who died due to congenital anomalies. We used negative-binomial regression adjusted for race, sex, multiple birth, and any maternal pregnancy risk factors (as defined by the CDC) to determine the difference in IMR between private and Medicaid insurance. Chi-square or Fishers exact test was used to compare differences in categorical variables between groups. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We included 6,901,328 infants; 53.6% had private insurance and 46.4% were insured by Medicaid. Privately insured infants had a lower IMR compared with Medicaid insured infants (2.84/1000 vs. 5.32/1000; adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.71; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.62 to 0.81; p<.0001). The privately insured had higher rates of 1st trimester prenatal care compared to those with Medicaid (85.6% vs. 66.6%; p<.00001). Rates of infant morbidity and maternal morbidity (per CDC definitions) were lower among the privately insured compared to those with Medicaid (both p<.00001). The privately insured had lower rates of preterm (9.1% vs. 11.0%), extremely preterm (0.5% vs. 0.7%), low birth weight (7.1% vs. 9.6%), and extremely low birth weight (0.5% vs. 0.7%) births compared to those with Medicaid (all p<0.001). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Private insurance is associated with a lower IMR compared to Medicaid insurance. Privately insured pregnancies also have higher rates of early prenatal care, less morbidity, and less preterm and low birth weight births. There may be opportunities to improve access to care and pregnancy outcomes among Medicaid insured pregnancies in the United States. Cambridge University Press 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9209058/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.71 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Community Engagement
Johnson, Desalyn Louise
Carlo, Waldemar
Rahman, Fazlur AKM
Tindal, Rachel
Travers, Colm
163 Private or Public Health Insurance and Infant Outcomes in the United States
title 163 Private or Public Health Insurance and Infant Outcomes in the United States
title_full 163 Private or Public Health Insurance and Infant Outcomes in the United States
title_fullStr 163 Private or Public Health Insurance and Infant Outcomes in the United States
title_full_unstemmed 163 Private or Public Health Insurance and Infant Outcomes in the United States
title_short 163 Private or Public Health Insurance and Infant Outcomes in the United States
title_sort 163 private or public health insurance and infant outcomes in the united states
topic Community Engagement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209058/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.71
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsondesalynlouise 163privateorpublichealthinsuranceandinfantoutcomesintheunitedstates
AT carlowaldemar 163privateorpublichealthinsuranceandinfantoutcomesintheunitedstates
AT rahmanfazlurakm 163privateorpublichealthinsuranceandinfantoutcomesintheunitedstates
AT tindalrachel 163privateorpublichealthinsuranceandinfantoutcomesintheunitedstates
AT traverscolm 163privateorpublichealthinsuranceandinfantoutcomesintheunitedstates