Cargando…
350 Investigating the Architecture of Speech Processing Pathways in the Brain
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Speech production requires mapping between sound-based and motor-based neural representations of a word – accomplished by learning internal models. However, the neural bases of these internal models remain unclear. The aim of this study is to provide experimental evidence for these...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209272/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.198 |
_version_ | 1784729914000277504 |
---|---|
author | Nikolov, Plamen Damera, Skrikanth Steinberg, Noah Zur, Naama Chang, Lillian Yoon, Kyle Dreux, Marcus Turkeltaub, Peter Rauschecker, Josef Riesenhuber, Maximilian |
author_facet | Nikolov, Plamen Damera, Skrikanth Steinberg, Noah Zur, Naama Chang, Lillian Yoon, Kyle Dreux, Marcus Turkeltaub, Peter Rauschecker, Josef Riesenhuber, Maximilian |
author_sort | Nikolov, Plamen |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Speech production requires mapping between sound-based and motor-based neural representations of a word – accomplished by learning internal models. However, the neural bases of these internal models remain unclear. The aim of this study is to provide experimental evidence for these internal models in the brain during speech production. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: 16 healthy human adults were recruited for this electrooculography speech study. 20 English pseudowords were designed to vary on confusability along specific features of articulation (place vs manner). All words were controlled for length and voicing. Three task conditions were performed: speech perception, covert and overt speech production. EEG was recorded using a 64-channel Biosemi ActiveTwo system. EMG was recorded on the orbicularis orbis inferior and neck strap muscles. Overt productions were recorded with a high-quality microphone to determine overt production onset. EMG during was used to determine covert production onset. Neuroimaging: Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA), was used to probe the sound- and motor-based neural representations over sensors and time for each task. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Production (motor) and perception (sound) neural representations were calculated using a cross-validated squared Euclidean distance metric. The RSA results in the speech perception task show a strong selectivity around 150ms, which is compatible with recent human electrocorticography findings in human superior temporal gyrus. Parietal sensors showed a large difference for motor-based neural representations, indicating a strong encoding for production related processes, as hypothesized by previous studies on the ventral and dorsal stream model of language. Temporal sensors, however, showed a large change for both motor- and sound-based neural representations. This is a surprising result since temporal regions are believed to be primarily engaged in perception (sound-based) processes. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This study used neuroimaging (EEG) and advanced multivariate pattern analysis (RSA) to test models of production (motor-) and perception (sound-) based neural representations in three different speech task conditions. These results show strong feasibility of this approach to map how the perception and production processes interact in the brain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9209272 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92092722022-07-01 350 Investigating the Architecture of Speech Processing Pathways in the Brain Nikolov, Plamen Damera, Skrikanth Steinberg, Noah Zur, Naama Chang, Lillian Yoon, Kyle Dreux, Marcus Turkeltaub, Peter Rauschecker, Josef Riesenhuber, Maximilian J Clin Transl Sci Valued Approaches OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Speech production requires mapping between sound-based and motor-based neural representations of a word – accomplished by learning internal models. However, the neural bases of these internal models remain unclear. The aim of this study is to provide experimental evidence for these internal models in the brain during speech production. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: 16 healthy human adults were recruited for this electrooculography speech study. 20 English pseudowords were designed to vary on confusability along specific features of articulation (place vs manner). All words were controlled for length and voicing. Three task conditions were performed: speech perception, covert and overt speech production. EEG was recorded using a 64-channel Biosemi ActiveTwo system. EMG was recorded on the orbicularis orbis inferior and neck strap muscles. Overt productions were recorded with a high-quality microphone to determine overt production onset. EMG during was used to determine covert production onset. Neuroimaging: Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA), was used to probe the sound- and motor-based neural representations over sensors and time for each task. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Production (motor) and perception (sound) neural representations were calculated using a cross-validated squared Euclidean distance metric. The RSA results in the speech perception task show a strong selectivity around 150ms, which is compatible with recent human electrocorticography findings in human superior temporal gyrus. Parietal sensors showed a large difference for motor-based neural representations, indicating a strong encoding for production related processes, as hypothesized by previous studies on the ventral and dorsal stream model of language. Temporal sensors, however, showed a large change for both motor- and sound-based neural representations. This is a surprising result since temporal regions are believed to be primarily engaged in perception (sound-based) processes. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This study used neuroimaging (EEG) and advanced multivariate pattern analysis (RSA) to test models of production (motor-) and perception (sound-) based neural representations in three different speech task conditions. These results show strong feasibility of this approach to map how the perception and production processes interact in the brain. Cambridge University Press 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9209272/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.198 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work. |
spellingShingle | Valued Approaches Nikolov, Plamen Damera, Skrikanth Steinberg, Noah Zur, Naama Chang, Lillian Yoon, Kyle Dreux, Marcus Turkeltaub, Peter Rauschecker, Josef Riesenhuber, Maximilian 350 Investigating the Architecture of Speech Processing Pathways in the Brain |
title | 350 Investigating the Architecture of Speech Processing Pathways in the Brain |
title_full | 350 Investigating the Architecture of Speech Processing Pathways in the Brain |
title_fullStr | 350 Investigating the Architecture of Speech Processing Pathways in the Brain |
title_full_unstemmed | 350 Investigating the Architecture of Speech Processing Pathways in the Brain |
title_short | 350 Investigating the Architecture of Speech Processing Pathways in the Brain |
title_sort | 350 investigating the architecture of speech processing pathways in the brain |
topic | Valued Approaches |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209272/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.198 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nikolovplamen 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain AT dameraskrikanth 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain AT steinbergnoah 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain AT zurnaama 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain AT changlillian 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain AT yoonkyle 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain AT dreuxmarcus 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain AT turkeltaubpeter 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain AT rauscheckerjosef 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain AT riesenhubermaximilian 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain |