Cargando…

350 Investigating the Architecture of Speech Processing Pathways in the Brain

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Speech production requires mapping between sound-based and motor-based neural representations of a word – accomplished by learning internal models. However, the neural bases of these internal models remain unclear. The aim of this study is to provide experimental evidence for these...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nikolov, Plamen, Damera, Skrikanth, Steinberg, Noah, Zur, Naama, Chang, Lillian, Yoon, Kyle, Dreux, Marcus, Turkeltaub, Peter, Rauschecker, Josef, Riesenhuber, Maximilian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209272/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.198
_version_ 1784729914000277504
author Nikolov, Plamen
Damera, Skrikanth
Steinberg, Noah
Zur, Naama
Chang, Lillian
Yoon, Kyle
Dreux, Marcus
Turkeltaub, Peter
Rauschecker, Josef
Riesenhuber, Maximilian
author_facet Nikolov, Plamen
Damera, Skrikanth
Steinberg, Noah
Zur, Naama
Chang, Lillian
Yoon, Kyle
Dreux, Marcus
Turkeltaub, Peter
Rauschecker, Josef
Riesenhuber, Maximilian
author_sort Nikolov, Plamen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Speech production requires mapping between sound-based and motor-based neural representations of a word – accomplished by learning internal models. However, the neural bases of these internal models remain unclear. The aim of this study is to provide experimental evidence for these internal models in the brain during speech production. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: 16 healthy human adults were recruited for this electrooculography speech study. 20 English pseudowords were designed to vary on confusability along specific features of articulation (place vs manner). All words were controlled for length and voicing. Three task conditions were performed: speech perception, covert and overt speech production. EEG was recorded using a 64-channel Biosemi ActiveTwo system. EMG was recorded on the orbicularis orbis inferior and neck strap muscles. Overt productions were recorded with a high-quality microphone to determine overt production onset. EMG during was used to determine covert production onset. Neuroimaging: Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA), was used to probe the sound- and motor-based neural representations over sensors and time for each task. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Production (motor) and perception (sound) neural representations were calculated using a cross-validated squared Euclidean distance metric. The RSA results in the speech perception task show a strong selectivity around 150ms, which is compatible with recent human electrocorticography findings in human superior temporal gyrus. Parietal sensors showed a large difference for motor-based neural representations, indicating a strong encoding for production related processes, as hypothesized by previous studies on the ventral and dorsal stream model of language. Temporal sensors, however, showed a large change for both motor- and sound-based neural representations. This is a surprising result since temporal regions are believed to be primarily engaged in perception (sound-based) processes. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This study used neuroimaging (EEG) and advanced multivariate pattern analysis (RSA) to test models of production (motor-) and perception (sound-) based neural representations in three different speech task conditions. These results show strong feasibility of this approach to map how the perception and production processes interact in the brain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9209272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92092722022-07-01 350 Investigating the Architecture of Speech Processing Pathways in the Brain Nikolov, Plamen Damera, Skrikanth Steinberg, Noah Zur, Naama Chang, Lillian Yoon, Kyle Dreux, Marcus Turkeltaub, Peter Rauschecker, Josef Riesenhuber, Maximilian J Clin Transl Sci Valued Approaches OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Speech production requires mapping between sound-based and motor-based neural representations of a word – accomplished by learning internal models. However, the neural bases of these internal models remain unclear. The aim of this study is to provide experimental evidence for these internal models in the brain during speech production. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: 16 healthy human adults were recruited for this electrooculography speech study. 20 English pseudowords were designed to vary on confusability along specific features of articulation (place vs manner). All words were controlled for length and voicing. Three task conditions were performed: speech perception, covert and overt speech production. EEG was recorded using a 64-channel Biosemi ActiveTwo system. EMG was recorded on the orbicularis orbis inferior and neck strap muscles. Overt productions were recorded with a high-quality microphone to determine overt production onset. EMG during was used to determine covert production onset. Neuroimaging: Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA), was used to probe the sound- and motor-based neural representations over sensors and time for each task. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Production (motor) and perception (sound) neural representations were calculated using a cross-validated squared Euclidean distance metric. The RSA results in the speech perception task show a strong selectivity around 150ms, which is compatible with recent human electrocorticography findings in human superior temporal gyrus. Parietal sensors showed a large difference for motor-based neural representations, indicating a strong encoding for production related processes, as hypothesized by previous studies on the ventral and dorsal stream model of language. Temporal sensors, however, showed a large change for both motor- and sound-based neural representations. This is a surprising result since temporal regions are believed to be primarily engaged in perception (sound-based) processes. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This study used neuroimaging (EEG) and advanced multivariate pattern analysis (RSA) to test models of production (motor-) and perception (sound-) based neural representations in three different speech task conditions. These results show strong feasibility of this approach to map how the perception and production processes interact in the brain. Cambridge University Press 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9209272/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.198 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Valued Approaches
Nikolov, Plamen
Damera, Skrikanth
Steinberg, Noah
Zur, Naama
Chang, Lillian
Yoon, Kyle
Dreux, Marcus
Turkeltaub, Peter
Rauschecker, Josef
Riesenhuber, Maximilian
350 Investigating the Architecture of Speech Processing Pathways in the Brain
title 350 Investigating the Architecture of Speech Processing Pathways in the Brain
title_full 350 Investigating the Architecture of Speech Processing Pathways in the Brain
title_fullStr 350 Investigating the Architecture of Speech Processing Pathways in the Brain
title_full_unstemmed 350 Investigating the Architecture of Speech Processing Pathways in the Brain
title_short 350 Investigating the Architecture of Speech Processing Pathways in the Brain
title_sort 350 investigating the architecture of speech processing pathways in the brain
topic Valued Approaches
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209272/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.198
work_keys_str_mv AT nikolovplamen 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain
AT dameraskrikanth 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain
AT steinbergnoah 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain
AT zurnaama 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain
AT changlillian 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain
AT yoonkyle 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain
AT dreuxmarcus 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain
AT turkeltaubpeter 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain
AT rauscheckerjosef 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain
AT riesenhubermaximilian 350investigatingthearchitectureofspeechprocessingpathwaysinthebrain