Cargando…
Laparoscopic Co-surgeon Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement Versus Single Surgeon Mini Laparotomy
Introduction: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement is one of the most common treatments for pediatric hydrocephalus. However, device failures often occur, requiring operative revision of either the intraventricular or intraperitoneal shunt catheters. Historically, shunt placement was performed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747114 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26057 |
_version_ | 1784729944573607936 |
---|---|
author | Mulvaney, Graham Arnold, Michael Reinke, Caroline Wait, Scott Van Poppel, Mark McLanahan, Scott Schmelzer, Thomas Cosper, Graham Schulman, Andrew Jernigan, Sarah |
author_facet | Mulvaney, Graham Arnold, Michael Reinke, Caroline Wait, Scott Van Poppel, Mark McLanahan, Scott Schmelzer, Thomas Cosper, Graham Schulman, Andrew Jernigan, Sarah |
author_sort | Mulvaney, Graham |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement is one of the most common treatments for pediatric hydrocephalus. However, device failures often occur, requiring operative revision of either the intraventricular or intraperitoneal shunt catheters. Historically, shunt placement was performed via laparotomy, but there has been a trend towards laparoscopic-assisted placement of the intraperitoneal portion of the shunt. We examined the outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted versus open VP shunt placement utilizing a local institutional retrospective review. Methods: Single institution 2012-2017 retrospective review of all cases was performed. Patients were divided into two groups - laparoscopic and open. Thirty-day outcomes, patient age, surgery performed, surgical control time (SCT), length of stay (LOS), and readmission were analyzed. Results: Cohort analysis inclusion criteria included 188 patients. The cohort analysis showed both decreased laparoscopic-assisted SCT (56.4 vs 32.1 min, p<0.0001) and postop complications (16.7% vs 7.1%, p<0.07). There was no significant difference in surgical site infection or readmission rates. Conclusion: Local analysis show advantages for laparoscopic-assisted VP shunt placement over open single surgeon techniques with decreased SCT, LOS, and unplanned interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9209392 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92093922022-06-22 Laparoscopic Co-surgeon Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement Versus Single Surgeon Mini Laparotomy Mulvaney, Graham Arnold, Michael Reinke, Caroline Wait, Scott Van Poppel, Mark McLanahan, Scott Schmelzer, Thomas Cosper, Graham Schulman, Andrew Jernigan, Sarah Cureus Pediatric Surgery Introduction: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement is one of the most common treatments for pediatric hydrocephalus. However, device failures often occur, requiring operative revision of either the intraventricular or intraperitoneal shunt catheters. Historically, shunt placement was performed via laparotomy, but there has been a trend towards laparoscopic-assisted placement of the intraperitoneal portion of the shunt. We examined the outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted versus open VP shunt placement utilizing a local institutional retrospective review. Methods: Single institution 2012-2017 retrospective review of all cases was performed. Patients were divided into two groups - laparoscopic and open. Thirty-day outcomes, patient age, surgery performed, surgical control time (SCT), length of stay (LOS), and readmission were analyzed. Results: Cohort analysis inclusion criteria included 188 patients. The cohort analysis showed both decreased laparoscopic-assisted SCT (56.4 vs 32.1 min, p<0.0001) and postop complications (16.7% vs 7.1%, p<0.07). There was no significant difference in surgical site infection or readmission rates. Conclusion: Local analysis show advantages for laparoscopic-assisted VP shunt placement over open single surgeon techniques with decreased SCT, LOS, and unplanned interventions. Cureus 2022-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9209392/ /pubmed/35747114 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26057 Text en Copyright © 2022, Mulvaney et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Pediatric Surgery Mulvaney, Graham Arnold, Michael Reinke, Caroline Wait, Scott Van Poppel, Mark McLanahan, Scott Schmelzer, Thomas Cosper, Graham Schulman, Andrew Jernigan, Sarah Laparoscopic Co-surgeon Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement Versus Single Surgeon Mini Laparotomy |
title | Laparoscopic Co-surgeon Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement Versus Single Surgeon Mini Laparotomy |
title_full | Laparoscopic Co-surgeon Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement Versus Single Surgeon Mini Laparotomy |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic Co-surgeon Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement Versus Single Surgeon Mini Laparotomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic Co-surgeon Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement Versus Single Surgeon Mini Laparotomy |
title_short | Laparoscopic Co-surgeon Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement Versus Single Surgeon Mini Laparotomy |
title_sort | laparoscopic co-surgeon ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement versus single surgeon mini laparotomy |
topic | Pediatric Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747114 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26057 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mulvaneygraham laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy AT arnoldmichael laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy AT reinkecaroline laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy AT waitscott laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy AT vanpoppelmark laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy AT mclanahanscott laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy AT schmelzerthomas laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy AT cospergraham laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy AT schulmanandrew laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy AT jernigansarah laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy |