Cargando…

Laparoscopic Co-surgeon Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement Versus Single Surgeon Mini Laparotomy

Introduction: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement is one of the most common treatments for pediatric hydrocephalus. However, device failures often occur, requiring operative revision of either the intraventricular or intraperitoneal shunt catheters. Historically, shunt placement was performed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulvaney, Graham, Arnold, Michael, Reinke, Caroline, Wait, Scott, Van Poppel, Mark, McLanahan, Scott, Schmelzer, Thomas, Cosper, Graham, Schulman, Andrew, Jernigan, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747114
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26057
_version_ 1784729944573607936
author Mulvaney, Graham
Arnold, Michael
Reinke, Caroline
Wait, Scott
Van Poppel, Mark
McLanahan, Scott
Schmelzer, Thomas
Cosper, Graham
Schulman, Andrew
Jernigan, Sarah
author_facet Mulvaney, Graham
Arnold, Michael
Reinke, Caroline
Wait, Scott
Van Poppel, Mark
McLanahan, Scott
Schmelzer, Thomas
Cosper, Graham
Schulman, Andrew
Jernigan, Sarah
author_sort Mulvaney, Graham
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement is one of the most common treatments for pediatric hydrocephalus. However, device failures often occur, requiring operative revision of either the intraventricular or intraperitoneal shunt catheters. Historically, shunt placement was performed via laparotomy, but there has been a trend towards laparoscopic-assisted placement of the intraperitoneal portion of the shunt. We examined the outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted versus open VP shunt placement utilizing a local institutional retrospective review. Methods: Single institution 2012-2017 retrospective review of all cases was performed. Patients were divided into two groups - laparoscopic and open. Thirty-day outcomes, patient age, surgery performed, surgical control time (SCT), length of stay (LOS), and readmission were analyzed.  Results: Cohort analysis inclusion criteria included 188 patients. The cohort analysis showed both decreased laparoscopic-assisted SCT (56.4 vs 32.1 min, p<0.0001) and postop complications (16.7% vs 7.1%, p<0.07). There was no significant difference in surgical site infection or readmission rates.  Conclusion: Local analysis show advantages for laparoscopic-assisted VP shunt placement over open single surgeon techniques with decreased SCT, LOS, and unplanned interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9209392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92093922022-06-22 Laparoscopic Co-surgeon Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement Versus Single Surgeon Mini Laparotomy Mulvaney, Graham Arnold, Michael Reinke, Caroline Wait, Scott Van Poppel, Mark McLanahan, Scott Schmelzer, Thomas Cosper, Graham Schulman, Andrew Jernigan, Sarah Cureus Pediatric Surgery Introduction: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement is one of the most common treatments for pediatric hydrocephalus. However, device failures often occur, requiring operative revision of either the intraventricular or intraperitoneal shunt catheters. Historically, shunt placement was performed via laparotomy, but there has been a trend towards laparoscopic-assisted placement of the intraperitoneal portion of the shunt. We examined the outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted versus open VP shunt placement utilizing a local institutional retrospective review. Methods: Single institution 2012-2017 retrospective review of all cases was performed. Patients were divided into two groups - laparoscopic and open. Thirty-day outcomes, patient age, surgery performed, surgical control time (SCT), length of stay (LOS), and readmission were analyzed.  Results: Cohort analysis inclusion criteria included 188 patients. The cohort analysis showed both decreased laparoscopic-assisted SCT (56.4 vs 32.1 min, p<0.0001) and postop complications (16.7% vs 7.1%, p<0.07). There was no significant difference in surgical site infection or readmission rates.  Conclusion: Local analysis show advantages for laparoscopic-assisted VP shunt placement over open single surgeon techniques with decreased SCT, LOS, and unplanned interventions. Cureus 2022-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9209392/ /pubmed/35747114 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26057 Text en Copyright © 2022, Mulvaney et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Pediatric Surgery
Mulvaney, Graham
Arnold, Michael
Reinke, Caroline
Wait, Scott
Van Poppel, Mark
McLanahan, Scott
Schmelzer, Thomas
Cosper, Graham
Schulman, Andrew
Jernigan, Sarah
Laparoscopic Co-surgeon Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement Versus Single Surgeon Mini Laparotomy
title Laparoscopic Co-surgeon Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement Versus Single Surgeon Mini Laparotomy
title_full Laparoscopic Co-surgeon Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement Versus Single Surgeon Mini Laparotomy
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Co-surgeon Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement Versus Single Surgeon Mini Laparotomy
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Co-surgeon Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement Versus Single Surgeon Mini Laparotomy
title_short Laparoscopic Co-surgeon Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement Versus Single Surgeon Mini Laparotomy
title_sort laparoscopic co-surgeon ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement versus single surgeon mini laparotomy
topic Pediatric Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747114
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26057
work_keys_str_mv AT mulvaneygraham laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy
AT arnoldmichael laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy
AT reinkecaroline laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy
AT waitscott laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy
AT vanpoppelmark laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy
AT mclanahanscott laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy
AT schmelzerthomas laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy
AT cospergraham laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy
AT schulmanandrew laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy
AT jernigansarah laparoscopiccosurgeonventriculoperitonealshuntplacementversussinglesurgeonminilaparotomy