Cargando…

Development, Validation, and Comparison of Image-Based, Clinical Feature-Based and Fusion Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Models in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop effective artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic models based on CT images of pulmonary nodules only, on descriptional and quantitative clinical or image features, or on a combination of both to differentiate benign and malignant ground-glass nodules (GGNs) to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xiang, Gao, Man, Xie, Jicai, Deng, Yanfang, Tu, Wenting, Yang, Hua, Liang, Shuang, Xu, Panlong, Zhang, Mingzi, Lu, Yang, Fu, ChiCheng, Li, Qiong, Fan, Li, Liu, Shiyuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.892890
_version_ 1784729990752894976
author Wang, Xiang
Gao, Man
Xie, Jicai
Deng, Yanfang
Tu, Wenting
Yang, Hua
Liang, Shuang
Xu, Panlong
Zhang, Mingzi
Lu, Yang
Fu, ChiCheng
Li, Qiong
Fan, Li
Liu, Shiyuan
author_facet Wang, Xiang
Gao, Man
Xie, Jicai
Deng, Yanfang
Tu, Wenting
Yang, Hua
Liang, Shuang
Xu, Panlong
Zhang, Mingzi
Lu, Yang
Fu, ChiCheng
Li, Qiong
Fan, Li
Liu, Shiyuan
author_sort Wang, Xiang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop effective artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic models based on CT images of pulmonary nodules only, on descriptional and quantitative clinical or image features, or on a combination of both to differentiate benign and malignant ground-glass nodules (GGNs) to assist in the determination of surgical intervention. METHODS: Our study included a total of 867 nodules (benign nodules: 112; malignant nodules: 755) with postoperative pathological diagnoses from two centers. For the diagnostic models to discriminate between benign and malignant GGNs, we adopted three different artificial intelligence (AI) approaches: a) an image-based deep learning approach to build a deep neural network (DNN); b) a clinical feature-based machine learning approach based on the clinical and image features of nodules; c) a fusion diagnostic model integrating the original images and the clinical and image features. The performance of the models was evaluated on an internal test dataset (the “Changzheng Dataset”) and an independent test dataset collected from an external institute (the “Longyan Dataset”). In addition, the performance of automatic diagnostic models was compared with that of manual evaluations by two radiologists on the ‘Longyan dataset’. RESULTS: The image-based deep learning model achieved an appealing diagnostic performance, yielding AUC values of 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62, 0.89) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.90), respectively, on both the Changzheng and Longyan datasets. The clinical feature-based machine learning model performed well on the Changzheng dataset (AUC, 0.80 [95% CI: 0.64, 0.96]), whereas it performed poorly on the Longyan dataset (AUC, 0.62 [95% CI: 0.42, 0.83]). The fusion diagnostic model achieved the best performance on both the Changzheng dataset (AUC, 0.82 [95% CI: 0.71-0.93]) and the Longyan dataset (AUC, 0.83 [95% CI: 0.70-0.96]), and it achieved a better specificity (0.69) than the radiologists (0.33-0.44) on the Longyan dataset. CONCLUSION: The deep learning models, including both the image-based deep learning model and the fusion model, have the ability to assist radiologists in differentiating between benign and malignant nodules for the precise management of patients with GGNs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9209648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92096482022-06-22 Development, Validation, and Comparison of Image-Based, Clinical Feature-Based and Fusion Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Models in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules Wang, Xiang Gao, Man Xie, Jicai Deng, Yanfang Tu, Wenting Yang, Hua Liang, Shuang Xu, Panlong Zhang, Mingzi Lu, Yang Fu, ChiCheng Li, Qiong Fan, Li Liu, Shiyuan Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop effective artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic models based on CT images of pulmonary nodules only, on descriptional and quantitative clinical or image features, or on a combination of both to differentiate benign and malignant ground-glass nodules (GGNs) to assist in the determination of surgical intervention. METHODS: Our study included a total of 867 nodules (benign nodules: 112; malignant nodules: 755) with postoperative pathological diagnoses from two centers. For the diagnostic models to discriminate between benign and malignant GGNs, we adopted three different artificial intelligence (AI) approaches: a) an image-based deep learning approach to build a deep neural network (DNN); b) a clinical feature-based machine learning approach based on the clinical and image features of nodules; c) a fusion diagnostic model integrating the original images and the clinical and image features. The performance of the models was evaluated on an internal test dataset (the “Changzheng Dataset”) and an independent test dataset collected from an external institute (the “Longyan Dataset”). In addition, the performance of automatic diagnostic models was compared with that of manual evaluations by two radiologists on the ‘Longyan dataset’. RESULTS: The image-based deep learning model achieved an appealing diagnostic performance, yielding AUC values of 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62, 0.89) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.90), respectively, on both the Changzheng and Longyan datasets. The clinical feature-based machine learning model performed well on the Changzheng dataset (AUC, 0.80 [95% CI: 0.64, 0.96]), whereas it performed poorly on the Longyan dataset (AUC, 0.62 [95% CI: 0.42, 0.83]). The fusion diagnostic model achieved the best performance on both the Changzheng dataset (AUC, 0.82 [95% CI: 0.71-0.93]) and the Longyan dataset (AUC, 0.83 [95% CI: 0.70-0.96]), and it achieved a better specificity (0.69) than the radiologists (0.33-0.44) on the Longyan dataset. CONCLUSION: The deep learning models, including both the image-based deep learning model and the fusion model, have the ability to assist radiologists in differentiating between benign and malignant nodules for the precise management of patients with GGNs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9209648/ /pubmed/35747810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.892890 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Gao, Xie, Deng, Tu, Yang, Liang, Xu, Zhang, Lu, Fu, Li, Fan and Liu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Wang, Xiang
Gao, Man
Xie, Jicai
Deng, Yanfang
Tu, Wenting
Yang, Hua
Liang, Shuang
Xu, Panlong
Zhang, Mingzi
Lu, Yang
Fu, ChiCheng
Li, Qiong
Fan, Li
Liu, Shiyuan
Development, Validation, and Comparison of Image-Based, Clinical Feature-Based and Fusion Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Models in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules
title Development, Validation, and Comparison of Image-Based, Clinical Feature-Based and Fusion Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Models in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules
title_full Development, Validation, and Comparison of Image-Based, Clinical Feature-Based and Fusion Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Models in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules
title_fullStr Development, Validation, and Comparison of Image-Based, Clinical Feature-Based and Fusion Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Models in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules
title_full_unstemmed Development, Validation, and Comparison of Image-Based, Clinical Feature-Based and Fusion Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Models in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules
title_short Development, Validation, and Comparison of Image-Based, Clinical Feature-Based and Fusion Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Models in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules
title_sort development, validation, and comparison of image-based, clinical feature-based and fusion artificial intelligence diagnostic models in differentiating benign and malignant pulmonary ground-glass nodules
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.892890
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxiang developmentvalidationandcomparisonofimagebasedclinicalfeaturebasedandfusionartificialintelligencediagnosticmodelsindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantpulmonarygroundglassnodules
AT gaoman developmentvalidationandcomparisonofimagebasedclinicalfeaturebasedandfusionartificialintelligencediagnosticmodelsindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantpulmonarygroundglassnodules
AT xiejicai developmentvalidationandcomparisonofimagebasedclinicalfeaturebasedandfusionartificialintelligencediagnosticmodelsindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantpulmonarygroundglassnodules
AT dengyanfang developmentvalidationandcomparisonofimagebasedclinicalfeaturebasedandfusionartificialintelligencediagnosticmodelsindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantpulmonarygroundglassnodules
AT tuwenting developmentvalidationandcomparisonofimagebasedclinicalfeaturebasedandfusionartificialintelligencediagnosticmodelsindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantpulmonarygroundglassnodules
AT yanghua developmentvalidationandcomparisonofimagebasedclinicalfeaturebasedandfusionartificialintelligencediagnosticmodelsindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantpulmonarygroundglassnodules
AT liangshuang developmentvalidationandcomparisonofimagebasedclinicalfeaturebasedandfusionartificialintelligencediagnosticmodelsindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantpulmonarygroundglassnodules
AT xupanlong developmentvalidationandcomparisonofimagebasedclinicalfeaturebasedandfusionartificialintelligencediagnosticmodelsindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantpulmonarygroundglassnodules
AT zhangmingzi developmentvalidationandcomparisonofimagebasedclinicalfeaturebasedandfusionartificialintelligencediagnosticmodelsindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantpulmonarygroundglassnodules
AT luyang developmentvalidationandcomparisonofimagebasedclinicalfeaturebasedandfusionartificialintelligencediagnosticmodelsindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantpulmonarygroundglassnodules
AT fuchicheng developmentvalidationandcomparisonofimagebasedclinicalfeaturebasedandfusionartificialintelligencediagnosticmodelsindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantpulmonarygroundglassnodules
AT liqiong developmentvalidationandcomparisonofimagebasedclinicalfeaturebasedandfusionartificialintelligencediagnosticmodelsindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantpulmonarygroundglassnodules
AT fanli developmentvalidationandcomparisonofimagebasedclinicalfeaturebasedandfusionartificialintelligencediagnosticmodelsindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantpulmonarygroundglassnodules
AT liushiyuan developmentvalidationandcomparisonofimagebasedclinicalfeaturebasedandfusionartificialintelligencediagnosticmodelsindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantpulmonarygroundglassnodules