Cargando…

Iterative reconstruction with multifrequency signal recognition technology to improve low-contrast detectability: A phantom study

BACKGROUND: Brain CT needs more attention to improve the extremely low image contrast and image texture. PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of iterative progressive reconstruction with visual modeling (IPV) for the improvement of low-contrast detectability (IPV-LCD) compared with filtered backproj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Funama, Yoshinori, Shirasaka, Takashi, Goto, Taiga, Aoki, Yuko, Tanaka, Kana, Yoshida, Ryo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20584601221109919
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Brain CT needs more attention to improve the extremely low image contrast and image texture. PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of iterative progressive reconstruction with visual modeling (IPV) for the improvement of low-contrast detectability (IPV-LCD) compared with filtered backprojection (FBP) and conventional IPV. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Low-contrast and water phantoms were used. Helical scans were conducted with the use of a CT scanner with 64 detectors. The tube voltage was set at 120 kVp; the tube current was adjusted from 60 to 300 mA with a slice thickness of 0.625 mm and from 20 to 150 mA with a slice thickness of 5.0 mm. Images were reconstructed with the FBP, conventional IPV, and IPV-LCD algorithms. The channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) model was applied in conjunction with the use of low-contrast modules in the low-contrast phantom. The noise power spectrum (NPS) and normalized NPS were calculated. RESULTS: At the same standard and strong levels, the IPV-LCD method improved low-contrast detectability compared with the conventional IPV, regardless of contrast-rod diameters. The mean CHO values at a slice thickness of 0.625 mm were 1.83, 3.28, 4.40, 4.53, and 5.27 for FBP, IPV STD, IPV-LCD STD, IPV STR, and IPV-LCD STR, respectively. The normalized NPS for the IPV-LCD STD and STR images were slightly shifted to the higher frequency compared with that for the FBP image. CONCLUSION: IPV-LCD images further improve the low-contrast detectability compared with FBP and conventional IPV images while maintaining similar FBP image appearances.