Cargando…

Comparing the effect of peritoneal dialysis cycler type on patient-reported satisfaction, support needs and treatments

BACKGROUND: Most patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the United States choose automated PD via cyclers. Cyclers have evolved considerably over time with older versions (e.g. HomeChoice Pro) replaced by more sophisticated and technologically advanced versions (e.g. Amia). Understanding the effect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shamy, Osama El, Atallah, Sara, Sharma, Shuchita, Uribarri, Jaime
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35729558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02854-z
_version_ 1784730033178279936
author Shamy, Osama El
Atallah, Sara
Sharma, Shuchita
Uribarri, Jaime
author_facet Shamy, Osama El
Atallah, Sara
Sharma, Shuchita
Uribarri, Jaime
author_sort Shamy, Osama El
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the United States choose automated PD via cyclers. Cyclers have evolved considerably over time with older versions (e.g. HomeChoice Pro) replaced by more sophisticated and technologically advanced versions (e.g. Amia). Understanding the effect that different cyclers and their features have on patient treatments and support needs is important.  METHODS: Single center study with retrospective and prospective arms. Retrospective arm: Patients > 18 years old, on Amia or HomeChoice Pro (HC) for ≥ 3 months between 8/1/17 and 1/31/18. Number of office/telephone encounters, PD-related emergency room visits/hospitalizations, PD training days, and dialysis adequacy (Kt/V) were recorded. Prospective arm: Patients > 18 years old, on Amia or HC for ≥ 3 months between 9/1/19 and 2/29/20 were surveyed on their comfort, troubleshooting, satisfaction and reported assistance needed with their cyclers. RESULTS: Retrospective arm: 43 patients on AMIA and 27 patients on HC. Number of PD training days, Kt/Vs achieved, PD-related telephone/office encounters, and PD-related emergency room visits/hospitalizations were all similar. Prospective Arm: 32 patients on AMIA and 6 patients on HC. Higher rate of patient comfort with AMIA, but similar overall patient satisfaction with both cyclers. No difference in terms of patient-reported troubleshooting issues requiring assistance. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the difference in features provided between the 2 cyclers, patient overall satisfaction rates were high irrespective of the PD cycler. The HomeChoice Pro and AMIA cycler patients had a similar number of PD training days, PD-related telephone/office encounters, and PD-related emergency room visits/hospitalizations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was approved by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Institutional Review Board (IRB-17–02704).  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-022-02854-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9209826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92098262022-06-21 Comparing the effect of peritoneal dialysis cycler type on patient-reported satisfaction, support needs and treatments Shamy, Osama El Atallah, Sara Sharma, Shuchita Uribarri, Jaime BMC Nephrol Research BACKGROUND: Most patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the United States choose automated PD via cyclers. Cyclers have evolved considerably over time with older versions (e.g. HomeChoice Pro) replaced by more sophisticated and technologically advanced versions (e.g. Amia). Understanding the effect that different cyclers and their features have on patient treatments and support needs is important.  METHODS: Single center study with retrospective and prospective arms. Retrospective arm: Patients > 18 years old, on Amia or HomeChoice Pro (HC) for ≥ 3 months between 8/1/17 and 1/31/18. Number of office/telephone encounters, PD-related emergency room visits/hospitalizations, PD training days, and dialysis adequacy (Kt/V) were recorded. Prospective arm: Patients > 18 years old, on Amia or HC for ≥ 3 months between 9/1/19 and 2/29/20 were surveyed on their comfort, troubleshooting, satisfaction and reported assistance needed with their cyclers. RESULTS: Retrospective arm: 43 patients on AMIA and 27 patients on HC. Number of PD training days, Kt/Vs achieved, PD-related telephone/office encounters, and PD-related emergency room visits/hospitalizations were all similar. Prospective Arm: 32 patients on AMIA and 6 patients on HC. Higher rate of patient comfort with AMIA, but similar overall patient satisfaction with both cyclers. No difference in terms of patient-reported troubleshooting issues requiring assistance. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the difference in features provided between the 2 cyclers, patient overall satisfaction rates were high irrespective of the PD cycler. The HomeChoice Pro and AMIA cycler patients had a similar number of PD training days, PD-related telephone/office encounters, and PD-related emergency room visits/hospitalizations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was approved by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Institutional Review Board (IRB-17–02704).  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-022-02854-z. BioMed Central 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9209826/ /pubmed/35729558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02854-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Shamy, Osama El
Atallah, Sara
Sharma, Shuchita
Uribarri, Jaime
Comparing the effect of peritoneal dialysis cycler type on patient-reported satisfaction, support needs and treatments
title Comparing the effect of peritoneal dialysis cycler type on patient-reported satisfaction, support needs and treatments
title_full Comparing the effect of peritoneal dialysis cycler type on patient-reported satisfaction, support needs and treatments
title_fullStr Comparing the effect of peritoneal dialysis cycler type on patient-reported satisfaction, support needs and treatments
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the effect of peritoneal dialysis cycler type on patient-reported satisfaction, support needs and treatments
title_short Comparing the effect of peritoneal dialysis cycler type on patient-reported satisfaction, support needs and treatments
title_sort comparing the effect of peritoneal dialysis cycler type on patient-reported satisfaction, support needs and treatments
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35729558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02854-z
work_keys_str_mv AT shamyosamael comparingtheeffectofperitonealdialysiscyclertypeonpatientreportedsatisfactionsupportneedsandtreatments
AT atallahsara comparingtheeffectofperitonealdialysiscyclertypeonpatientreportedsatisfactionsupportneedsandtreatments
AT sharmashuchita comparingtheeffectofperitonealdialysiscyclertypeonpatientreportedsatisfactionsupportneedsandtreatments
AT uribarrijaime comparingtheeffectofperitonealdialysiscyclertypeonpatientreportedsatisfactionsupportneedsandtreatments