Cargando…

False Positive Hemianopia

A 70-year-old woman was urgently referred for neuro-ophthalmic evaluation when a routine visual field test demonstrated a pattern of bilateral nasal hemianopia. Detailed inspection of the visual field study revealed the hemianopias to be artifactual for the following reasons: (1) it was performed wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ben-Avi, Ravid, Nahum, Addy, Kruger, Joshua M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35811774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000522392
_version_ 1784730057750609920
author Ben-Avi, Ravid
Nahum, Addy
Kruger, Joshua M.
author_facet Ben-Avi, Ravid
Nahum, Addy
Kruger, Joshua M.
author_sort Ben-Avi, Ravid
collection PubMed
description A 70-year-old woman was urgently referred for neuro-ophthalmic evaluation when a routine visual field test demonstrated a pattern of bilateral nasal hemianopia. Detailed inspection of the visual field study revealed the hemianopias to be artifactual for the following reasons: (1) it was performed with an excessive number of false positive responses; (2) the grey scale plot had white patches, consistent with abnormally high sensitivity; (3) the total deviation probability maps were normal, indicating that no tested points had poor scores. Confrontational visual field testing was normal in all zones for both eyes. Repeated visual field testing showed no evidence of a true hemianopia. Even automated visual fields with highly specific abnormalities can merely be testing artifact. Scrutinize all components of the report before determining the clinical implications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9209951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92099512022-07-08 False Positive Hemianopia Ben-Avi, Ravid Nahum, Addy Kruger, Joshua M. Case Rep Ophthalmol Case Report A 70-year-old woman was urgently referred for neuro-ophthalmic evaluation when a routine visual field test demonstrated a pattern of bilateral nasal hemianopia. Detailed inspection of the visual field study revealed the hemianopias to be artifactual for the following reasons: (1) it was performed with an excessive number of false positive responses; (2) the grey scale plot had white patches, consistent with abnormally high sensitivity; (3) the total deviation probability maps were normal, indicating that no tested points had poor scores. Confrontational visual field testing was normal in all zones for both eyes. Repeated visual field testing showed no evidence of a true hemianopia. Even automated visual fields with highly specific abnormalities can merely be testing artifact. Scrutinize all components of the report before determining the clinical implications. S. Karger AG 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9209951/ /pubmed/35811774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000522392 Text en Copyright © 2022 by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-4.0 International License (CC BY-NC) (http://www.karger.com/Services/OpenAccessLicense). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission.
spellingShingle Case Report
Ben-Avi, Ravid
Nahum, Addy
Kruger, Joshua M.
False Positive Hemianopia
title False Positive Hemianopia
title_full False Positive Hemianopia
title_fullStr False Positive Hemianopia
title_full_unstemmed False Positive Hemianopia
title_short False Positive Hemianopia
title_sort false positive hemianopia
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35811774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000522392
work_keys_str_mv AT benaviravid falsepositivehemianopia
AT nahumaddy falsepositivehemianopia
AT krugerjoshuam falsepositivehemianopia