Cargando…
Particle Size, Mass Concentration, and Microbiota in Dental Aerosols
Many dental procedures are considered aerosol-generating procedures that may put the dental operator and patients at risk for cross-infection due to contamination from nasal secretions and saliva. This aerosol, depending on the size of the particles, may stay suspended in the air for hours. The prim...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35384778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345221087880 |
_version_ | 1784730091745443840 |
---|---|
author | Rafiee, A. Carvalho, R. Lunardon, D. Flores-Mir, C. Major, P. Quemerais, B. Altabtbaei, K. |
author_facet | Rafiee, A. Carvalho, R. Lunardon, D. Flores-Mir, C. Major, P. Quemerais, B. Altabtbaei, K. |
author_sort | Rafiee, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many dental procedures are considered aerosol-generating procedures that may put the dental operator and patients at risk for cross-infection due to contamination from nasal secretions and saliva. This aerosol, depending on the size of the particles, may stay suspended in the air for hours. The primary objective of the study was to characterize the size and concentrations of particles emitted from 7 different dental procedures, as well as estimate the contribution of the nasal and salivary fluids of the patient to the microbiota in the emitted bioaerosol. This cross-sectional study was conducted in an open-concept dental clinic with multiple operators at the same time. Particle size characterization and mass and particle concentrations were done by using 2 direct reading instruments: Dust-Trak DRX (Model 8534) and optical particle sizer (Model 3330). Active bioaerosol sampling was done before and during procedures. Bayesian modeling (SourceTracker2) of long-reads of the 16S ribosomal DNA was used to estimate the contribution of the patients’ nasal and salivary fluids to the bioaerosol. Aerosols in most dental procedures were sub-PM(1) dominant. Orthodontic debonding and denture adjustment consistently demonstrated more particles in the PM(1), PM(2.5), PM(4), and PM(10) ranges. The microbiota in bioaerosol samples were significantly different from saliva and nasal samples in both membership and abundance (P < 0.05) but not different from preoperative ambient air samples. A median of 80.15% of operator exposure was attributable to sources other than the patients’ salivary or nasal fluids. Median operator’s exposure from patients’ fluids ranged from 1.45% to 2.75%. Corridor microbiota showed more patients’ nasal bioaerosols than oral bioaerosols. High-volume saliva ejector and saliva ejector were effective in reducing bioaerosol escape. Patient nasal and salivary fluids are minor contributors to the operator’s bioaerosol exposure, which has important implications for COVID-19. Control of bioaerosolization of nasal fluids warrants further investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9210116 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92101162022-06-22 Particle Size, Mass Concentration, and Microbiota in Dental Aerosols Rafiee, A. Carvalho, R. Lunardon, D. Flores-Mir, C. Major, P. Quemerais, B. Altabtbaei, K. J Dent Res Research Reports Many dental procedures are considered aerosol-generating procedures that may put the dental operator and patients at risk for cross-infection due to contamination from nasal secretions and saliva. This aerosol, depending on the size of the particles, may stay suspended in the air for hours. The primary objective of the study was to characterize the size and concentrations of particles emitted from 7 different dental procedures, as well as estimate the contribution of the nasal and salivary fluids of the patient to the microbiota in the emitted bioaerosol. This cross-sectional study was conducted in an open-concept dental clinic with multiple operators at the same time. Particle size characterization and mass and particle concentrations were done by using 2 direct reading instruments: Dust-Trak DRX (Model 8534) and optical particle sizer (Model 3330). Active bioaerosol sampling was done before and during procedures. Bayesian modeling (SourceTracker2) of long-reads of the 16S ribosomal DNA was used to estimate the contribution of the patients’ nasal and salivary fluids to the bioaerosol. Aerosols in most dental procedures were sub-PM(1) dominant. Orthodontic debonding and denture adjustment consistently demonstrated more particles in the PM(1), PM(2.5), PM(4), and PM(10) ranges. The microbiota in bioaerosol samples were significantly different from saliva and nasal samples in both membership and abundance (P < 0.05) but not different from preoperative ambient air samples. A median of 80.15% of operator exposure was attributable to sources other than the patients’ salivary or nasal fluids. Median operator’s exposure from patients’ fluids ranged from 1.45% to 2.75%. Corridor microbiota showed more patients’ nasal bioaerosols than oral bioaerosols. High-volume saliva ejector and saliva ejector were effective in reducing bioaerosol escape. Patient nasal and salivary fluids are minor contributors to the operator’s bioaerosol exposure, which has important implications for COVID-19. Control of bioaerosolization of nasal fluids warrants further investigation. SAGE Publications 2022-04-06 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9210116/ /pubmed/35384778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345221087880 Text en © International Association for Dental Research and American Association for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Research 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Research Reports Rafiee, A. Carvalho, R. Lunardon, D. Flores-Mir, C. Major, P. Quemerais, B. Altabtbaei, K. Particle Size, Mass Concentration, and Microbiota in Dental Aerosols |
title | Particle Size, Mass Concentration, and Microbiota in Dental Aerosols |
title_full | Particle Size, Mass Concentration, and Microbiota in Dental Aerosols |
title_fullStr | Particle Size, Mass Concentration, and Microbiota in Dental Aerosols |
title_full_unstemmed | Particle Size, Mass Concentration, and Microbiota in Dental Aerosols |
title_short | Particle Size, Mass Concentration, and Microbiota in Dental Aerosols |
title_sort | particle size, mass concentration, and microbiota in dental aerosols |
topic | Research Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35384778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345221087880 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rafieea particlesizemassconcentrationandmicrobiotaindentalaerosols AT carvalhor particlesizemassconcentrationandmicrobiotaindentalaerosols AT lunardond particlesizemassconcentrationandmicrobiotaindentalaerosols AT floresmirc particlesizemassconcentrationandmicrobiotaindentalaerosols AT majorp particlesizemassconcentrationandmicrobiotaindentalaerosols AT quemeraisb particlesizemassconcentrationandmicrobiotaindentalaerosols AT altabtbaeik particlesizemassconcentrationandmicrobiotaindentalaerosols |