Cargando…

A Comparison of Various Surgical Treatments for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort. OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term outcomes for Laminoplasty, Laminectomy/fusion, and ACDF. METHODS: We utilized a prospectively-collected, multi-center national database with a propensity score matching algorithm to compare the short-term outcomes for laminopla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Nathan J., Kim, Jun S., Park, Paul, Riew, K. Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33375849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220976092
_version_ 1784730124291145728
author Lee, Nathan J.
Kim, Jun S.
Park, Paul
Riew, K. Daniel
author_facet Lee, Nathan J.
Kim, Jun S.
Park, Paul
Riew, K. Daniel
author_sort Lee, Nathan J.
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort. OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term outcomes for Laminoplasty, Laminectomy/fusion, and ACDF. METHODS: We utilized a prospectively-collected, multi-center national database with a propensity score matching algorithm to compare the short-term outcomes for laminoplasty, laminectomy/fusion, and multi-level (>3) ACDF (with and without corpectomy). Bivariate analyses involved both chi-square/fisher exact test and t-test/ANOVA on perioperative factors. Multivariate analyses were performed to determined independent risk factors for short term outcomes. RESULTS: 546 patients remained after propensity score matching, with 182 patients in each cohort. ACDF required the longest operative time 188 ± 79 versus laminectomy/fusion (169 ± 75, p = 0.017), and laminoplasty (167 ± 66, p = 0.004). ACDF required the shortest hospital stay (LOS ≥ 2: ACDF 56.6%, laminoplasty 89.6%, laminectomy/fusion 93.4%, p < 0.05). ACDF had lower overall complications (ACDF 3.9%, laminoplasty 7.7%, laminectomy/fusion 11.5%, p < 0.05), mortality (ACDF 0%, laminoplasty 0.55%, laminectomy/fusion 2.2%, p < 0.05), and unplanned readmissions (ACDF 4.4%, laminoplasty 4.4%, laminectomy/fusion 9.9%, p < 0.05). No significant differences were seen in the other outcomes including DVT/PT, acute renal failure, UTI, stroke, cardiac complications, or sepsis. In the multivariate analysis, laminectomy/fusion (OR 17, reference: ACDF) and laminoplasty (OR10, reference: ACDF) were strong independent risk factors for LOS ≥ 2 days. Laminectomy/fusion (OR 3.2, reference: ACDF) was an independent predictor for any adverse events 30-days after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Laminectomy/fusion carries the highest risk for morbidity, mortality, and unplanned readmissions in the short-term postoperative period. Laminoplasty and ACDF cases carry similar short-term complications risks. ACDF is significantly associated with the longest operative duration and shortest LOS without an increase in individual or overall complications, readmissions, or reoperations
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9210244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92102442022-06-22 A Comparison of Various Surgical Treatments for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis Lee, Nathan J. Kim, Jun S. Park, Paul Riew, K. Daniel Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort. OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term outcomes for Laminoplasty, Laminectomy/fusion, and ACDF. METHODS: We utilized a prospectively-collected, multi-center national database with a propensity score matching algorithm to compare the short-term outcomes for laminoplasty, laminectomy/fusion, and multi-level (>3) ACDF (with and without corpectomy). Bivariate analyses involved both chi-square/fisher exact test and t-test/ANOVA on perioperative factors. Multivariate analyses were performed to determined independent risk factors for short term outcomes. RESULTS: 546 patients remained after propensity score matching, with 182 patients in each cohort. ACDF required the longest operative time 188 ± 79 versus laminectomy/fusion (169 ± 75, p = 0.017), and laminoplasty (167 ± 66, p = 0.004). ACDF required the shortest hospital stay (LOS ≥ 2: ACDF 56.6%, laminoplasty 89.6%, laminectomy/fusion 93.4%, p < 0.05). ACDF had lower overall complications (ACDF 3.9%, laminoplasty 7.7%, laminectomy/fusion 11.5%, p < 0.05), mortality (ACDF 0%, laminoplasty 0.55%, laminectomy/fusion 2.2%, p < 0.05), and unplanned readmissions (ACDF 4.4%, laminoplasty 4.4%, laminectomy/fusion 9.9%, p < 0.05). No significant differences were seen in the other outcomes including DVT/PT, acute renal failure, UTI, stroke, cardiac complications, or sepsis. In the multivariate analysis, laminectomy/fusion (OR 17, reference: ACDF) and laminoplasty (OR10, reference: ACDF) were strong independent risk factors for LOS ≥ 2 days. Laminectomy/fusion (OR 3.2, reference: ACDF) was an independent predictor for any adverse events 30-days after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Laminectomy/fusion carries the highest risk for morbidity, mortality, and unplanned readmissions in the short-term postoperative period. Laminoplasty and ACDF cases carry similar short-term complications risks. ACDF is significantly associated with the longest operative duration and shortest LOS without an increase in individual or overall complications, readmissions, or reoperations SAGE Publications 2020-12-30 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9210244/ /pubmed/33375849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220976092 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lee, Nathan J.
Kim, Jun S.
Park, Paul
Riew, K. Daniel
A Comparison of Various Surgical Treatments for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis
title A Comparison of Various Surgical Treatments for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis
title_full A Comparison of Various Surgical Treatments for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis
title_fullStr A Comparison of Various Surgical Treatments for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Various Surgical Treatments for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis
title_short A Comparison of Various Surgical Treatments for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis
title_sort comparison of various surgical treatments for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a propensity score matched analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33375849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220976092
work_keys_str_mv AT leenathanj acomparisonofvarioussurgicaltreatmentsfordegenerativecervicalmyelopathyapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT kimjuns acomparisonofvarioussurgicaltreatmentsfordegenerativecervicalmyelopathyapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT parkpaul acomparisonofvarioussurgicaltreatmentsfordegenerativecervicalmyelopathyapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT riewkdaniel acomparisonofvarioussurgicaltreatmentsfordegenerativecervicalmyelopathyapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT leenathanj comparisonofvarioussurgicaltreatmentsfordegenerativecervicalmyelopathyapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT kimjuns comparisonofvarioussurgicaltreatmentsfordegenerativecervicalmyelopathyapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT parkpaul comparisonofvarioussurgicaltreatmentsfordegenerativecervicalmyelopathyapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT riewkdaniel comparisonofvarioussurgicaltreatmentsfordegenerativecervicalmyelopathyapropensityscorematchedanalysis